Index of mail folders?

1999-05-04 Thread Tuomas Toivonen
I remember hearing somewhere about patches for mutt (or an external program) that would provide an usenet reader -like list (and selection functionality) of mail folders and the amount of messages in each. Any pointers to mentioned patches or ideas on how to achieve this? -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Can't Unlock Mailbox

1999-05-04 Thread David Thorburn-Gundlach
Warning Could not process message with given Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1; micalg=pgp-sha1;protocol="application/pgp-signature"

Re: Can't Unlock Mailbox

1999-05-04 Thread Bill Nottingham
Nathan A. Baker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: I'm using Mutt 0.95.4i with fcntl and I've recently (after an upgrade to RedHat 6.0 -- without replacing my own version of Mutt) been unable to unlock my /var/spool/mail/ mailbox file except as root. Does anyone know how to fix this? Is

Can't Unlock Mailbox

1999-05-04 Thread Nathan A. Baker
Warning Could not process message with given Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm; micalg=pgp-md5;protocol="application/pgp-signature"

Re: maildirs and erratic behaviour?

1999-05-04 Thread Duncan Sargeant
Thomas Roessler wrote on Sat May 01, at 19:28 +0200: there was a long-standing problem with mutt losing index position and even attribute settings when new messages were delivered to maildir folders. This should be fixed in 0.95 and 0.96, but nevertheless, I've been seeing some reports

Re: MS attachments

1999-05-04 Thread rfi from Rich Roth
On Mon, May 03, 1999 at 07:52:45AM -0500, Jim Graham wrote: problem Let's say there's an incoming message with that has spaces in the filename (yeah, I know...but some people seem to think it's a good thing). In other words, something like this: begin 600 99 Travel Expense Report

Re: MS attachments

1999-05-04 Thread David Resnick
Thanks a lot for the info about having procmail translate the uuencode bits to MIME. Now, of course, I've got to figure out procmail in order to try out your suggestion (I have no ~/.procmail), but it had to come some time, I guess... David