information on PGP-signed messages

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
Hello, there are many PGP-signed messages in this mailing-list. I don't have the public keys from all that senders. Can I shrink the 15 lines of useless (every time the same) PGP information? One line like "key unavailable", "sign OK" or "sign not OK" looks better on a 80x25 display... Jens

Re: information on PGP-signed messages

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
On Fri, Jun 25, 1999 at 06:37:11AM +0200, Jens Tautenhahn wrote: Hello, there are many PGP-signed messages in this mailing-list. I don't have the public keys from all that senders. Can I shrink the 15 lines of useless (every time the same) PGP information? One line like "key

Re: A few mutt questions

1999-06-25 Thread David Thorburn-Gundlach
Warning Could not process message with given Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=EuxKj2iCbKjpUGkD; micalg=pgp-sha1;protocol="application/pgp-signature"

jump to next old message

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
Warning Could not process message with given Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=xyF51EaUT3XiWnZP; micalg=pgp-sha1;protocol="application/pgp-signature"

Re: jump to next old message

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
On Fri, Jun 25, 1999 at 07:30:39AM -0400, David Thorburn-Gundlach wrote: Hi, folks -- I know that I can use tab to jump to the next new message, but is there a key or binding that I can use to jump to the next old message? I have a mailbox with some old-and-unread messages that I'd like to

Re: secure tunnel and IMAP

1999-06-25 Thread Aris Mulyono
On Thu, Jun 24, 1999 at 08:37:00PM -0700, Brian D. Winters wrote: I have the following in a script: ssh -f -L 4143:imapserver:143 sshhost 'sleep 5 /dev/null /dev/null' mutt $* What happens when 5 seconds have elapsed? Would port 4143 in the sshhost still forward to port 143 of the

Re: Mutt/Netscape

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
Brian D. Winters [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: Under Navigator, yes a mailto will bring up mutt, but as I failed to observe yesterday, it doesn't actually pass the address. This obviously isn't incredibly useful behavior. If I figure out a workaround I'll post it here, but otherwise it looks

Re: Mutt/Netscape

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
And this change makes xmutt work properly with navigator 4.61: [root@lhe unixpost-mutt]# diff xmutt.c xmutt_old.c 132c132 char* argv[16] = {XMUTT, to, NULL}; --- char* argv[16] = {XMUTT, NULL}; Thanks Chris. -- (T.) Michael Sanders internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Physics Department

send-hooks - cruel

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
Hi Many months of fiddling and I have not managed to get send-hooks to work. Here is my muttrc - can you see why? #send-hook '~A' 'my_hdr From: Mutt User user@winkle' send-hook '~A' 'my_hdr Subject: THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT' #send-hook . 'my_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]' #send-hook eric

Re: forward_decrypt

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
Thank you for your answer, forward_decrypt makes sense to me now. BTW, the subject line should have read: forward_decrypt, as it does now, sorry about it. Mark Bainter dixit: ~ ~ ~ Also, about encrypted mail, is there a way of having non-mime encrypted ~ (just as you would with digitally

Re: send-hooks - cruel

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
Eric Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In what way do they fail to work? Well, they do not set the headers or whatever, they just do not have any effect. The only un-commented send-hook in the huge muttrc file you sent was one that tries to set the subject header. I believe there is a

Re: Mutt/Netscape

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
On Fri, Jun 25, 1999 at 04:29:18PM -0700, Paul M. Lambert wrote: I've gone over the code, and there's a simple fix. I'm too lazy to do a diff, but here's a description: Thanks! That is way too obvious. ;) I guess this means that in Navigator 4.6x Netscape is actually following their own

mbox-hook?

1999-06-25 Thread Alex Lane
If I read the docs right, the line mbox-hook in.foo read.foo should move all read messages in in.foo to read.foo when I quit or change folders. Am I missing something? This does not seem to work. Cheers... -- Alex Lane mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Seabrook, Texas,