On Thu, Nov 11, 1999 at 05:51:19AM +0200, Mikko Hänninen thus spoke:
> Nathan Cullen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 10 Nov 1999:
> > My question is, can I have multiple "alternates" (one for each email
> > address), or do I have to bunch them all in to one big regex?
>
> You bunch them all in
On Wed, Nov 10, 1999 at 05:55:08PM -0500, Nathan Cullen thus spoke:
> I am trying to figure out the syntax of the "alternates" option. The
> mutt manual says "A regexp that allows you to specify alternate
> addresses where you receive email".
>
> My question is, can I have multiple "alternates"
Nathan Cullen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 10 Nov 1999:
> My question is, can I have multiple "alternates" (one for each email
> address), or do I have to bunch them all in to one big regex?
You bunch them all in one big regex. It looks slightly ugly but
fortunately it doesn't need to be hu
I am trying to figure out the syntax of the "alternates" option. The
mutt manual says "A regexp that allows you to specify alternate
addresses where you receive email".
My question is, can I have multiple "alternates" (one for each email
address), or do I have to bunch them all in to one big reg
On Wed, Nov 10, 1999 at 09:33:56PM +, Sean Rima wrote:
> > > [Did 'vacation' cause me to get bounced off the list?]
> >
> > Ummm... simply put, use procmail/formail... you'll have less problems
> > with it. (there are decent examples of making this work in the
> > procmailex man page)
>
> Th
> I've got a strange problem. After I updated to Mutt v1.0 ((1999-10-22)
> (the Debian package 1.0.0-2) all my colors were mixed around. After playing
> around quite a bit I found that I have to comment out the following lines
> in /etc/Muttrc:
Debian's /etc/Muttrc is a complete disaster in my
David DeSimone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 10 Nov 1999:
> This could be argued quite a bit, I imagine. Suppose your X server blew
> up, and took all your windows with it? Mutt cannot tell the difference
> between that condition, and closing the xterm with the [X] button. In
> both cases,
Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I am lazy and pressing that X is easier then typing "q", "y" :-)
>
> :set quit=yes
>
> Now you just have to type 'q' - from anywhere within the xterm.
The "y" that he's referring to might be the "delete" prompt, so perhaps
:set delete=ye
* Jan Houtsma ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [991109 18:33]:
> If i run mutt in an xterm (xterm -e mutt) and i read email
> then when i kill the window with the X in the right top
> corner of the window of course kills mutt also.
>
> But apparently mutt doesnt catch this signal cause it doesnt
> update the
Hi Shane!
On Wed, 10 Nov 1999, Shane Castle wrote:
> >Seriously OT but maybe not. I went on holiday and left vacation to answer my
> >mail, however, it should not send any mail back to the list.
> >
> >I was unsubscribed from the list and I wanted to know if my vacation sent an
> >auto-respond m
Hi Russell!
On Wed, 10 Nov 1999, Russell Van Tassell wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 10, 1999 at 01:25:52PM +, Sean Rima wrote:
> > Hi Folks,
> >
> > Seriously OT but maybe not. I went on holiday and left vacation to answer my
> > mail, however, it should not send any mail back to the list.
>
> Ummm.
On Wed, Nov 10, 1999 at 01:25:52PM +, Sean Rima wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> Seriously OT but maybe not. I went on holiday and left vacation to answer my
> mail, however, it should not send any mail back to the list.
Ummm... simply put, use procmail/formail... you'll have less problems
with it. (
sam rosenfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have a single-user (me) box with two potential mail users -- root
> and user. When I'm logged in as "user" and open mutt, I get an error
> message which reads: "/var/spool/mail/root: Permission denied
> (errno=13)".
The setting that controls this
Hi!
On Wed, Nov 10, 1999 at 05:41:12PM +, Sean Rima wrote:
> > But neverless: I use now the gpg.rc and the gpg-2comp. Signing works
> > fine, but encrypting (with or without signing) doesnt. Mutt just says
> > something like 'invoking PGP ...' but nothing happens ...
> >
> I use both and I c
On Wed, Nov 10, 1999, Shane Castle wrote:
> It serves absolutely no useful purpose and causes
> more problems that anything it was intended to solve. PLEASE don't use
> it! Don't even try to fix it; it's too broken!
Which version are you talking about?
IMHO it is a very useful program, ther
On Wed, 10 Nov 1999, Sean Rima wrote:
>Seriously OT but maybe not. I went on holiday and left vacation to answer my
>mail, however, it should not send any mail back to the list.
>
>I was unsubscribed from the list and I wanted to know if my vacation sent an
>auto-respond message.
>
>I only ask as
I have a single-user (me) box with two potential mail users -- root and
user. When I'm logged in as "user" and open mutt, I get an error message
which reads: "/var/spool/mail/root: Permission denied (errno=13)". I
have searched my .Muttrc file can find no place where this parameter can
be c
msg.pgp
Denis Chapligin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 10 Nov 1999:
> I have some letters that comes to me with "To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]". Every time
> i responding this message i need to add "CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]". Now i do this
> by hands. Is there any way to do it automatically?
Does using g(roup re
msg.pgp
On 1999-11-10 14:43:32 +0100, Christian v. Mueffling wrote:
> I used 1.1.1i ... so maybe the syntax indeed changed ??
Yes, it did. Have a look at the documentation.
--
http://www.guug.de/~roessler/
Hi Folks,
Seriously OT but maybe not. I went on holiday and left vacation to answer my
mail, however, it should not send any mail back to the list.
I was unsubscribed from the list and I wanted to know if my vacation sent an
auto-respond message.
I only ask as I plan on putting it back on again
Hi!
Sorry, after looking on the output of mutt (normaly there are only
lots of errors cause of not existing colors) i found this:
Error in .muttrc, line 382: pgp_gpg: unknown variable
Error in .muttrc, line 383: pgp_default_version: unknown variable
Error in .muttrc, line 384: pgp_encryptself: u
Hi
I have some letters that comes to me with "To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]". Every time
i responding this message i need to add "CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]". Now i do this
by hands. Is there any way to do it automatically?
--
Denis Chapligin
Hi Micha!
On Wed, 10 Nov 1999, Micha Holzmann wrote:
> Hello Christian,
>
> > n the mutt versions after 1.0i (1.1i and 1.1.1i) the gpg call doesnt
> > work anymore. After the input of the passphrase mutt just says
> > 'Invoking PGP ...' and doesnt do anything ...
> >
> > any hints?
>
> i post
Hello Christian,
> n the mutt versions after 1.0i (1.1i and 1.1.1i) the gpg call doesnt
> work anymore. After the input of the passphrase mutt just says
> 'Invoking PGP ...' and doesnt do anything ...
>
> any hints?
i posted a similar mail here. Concerning mutt and pgp 6.5.1i.
It seems not to b
Reply-To:
Hi!
In the mutt versions after 1.0i (1.1i and 1.1.1i) the gpg call doesnt
work anymore. After the input of the passphrase mutt just says
'Invoking PGP ...' and doesnt do anything ...
any hints?
chris
PGP signature
27 matches
Mail list logo
