As far as I can tell setting the From: when using qmail with mutt
requires that the environment variables MAILUSER, MAILHOST, MAILNAME
be set before starting mutt, along with QMAILINJECT=f.
Is there a way to set the From: within a mutt session when using
qmail as the MTA?
--
Patrick Walsh
Patrick Walsh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Fri, 28 Jan 2000:
As far as I can tell setting the From: when using qmail with mutt
requires that the environment variables MAILUSER, MAILHOST, MAILNAME
be set before starting mutt, along with QMAILINJECT=f.
It doesn't require them, though can specify
Hello,
I've been using mutt for sometime now, but just signed up for this
list today, so I apologize if this has already been discussed. :-)
There is a bug in the current version of procmail (3.14 - not sure if
it goes back further than that) that does not allow the procmail
recipe supplied in
I've been doing this on my qmail system; however, qmail still puts a "Return-Path"
header on the message which indicates the local username who called "sendmail." I
haven't found any way around this yet.
You can set the $QMAILUSER and $QMAILHOST env vars to specify what you want in the
Hi, it seems that my folder hooks are not run when I load a specific folder from the
command line.
For instance, I have a folder hook that looks like this:
folder-hook =mutt "my_hdr From: Jim Breton [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
But if I load mutt like this:
mutt -f ~/mail/mutt
It does not set
Jim Breton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Sat, 29 Jan 2000:
I've been doing this on my qmail system; however, qmail still puts a
"Return-Path" header on the message which indicates the local username
who called "sendmail." I haven't found any way around this yet.
Ahh. That's the envelope
Haha -- guess what. :) Just on a whim I tried setting the Return-Path with a
"my_hdr" command and qmail did honor it! Perfect!
I was all excited about it, but you beat me to the punch. :)
Thanks!
On Sat, Jan 29, 2000 at 08:42:58PM +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
Jim Breton [EMAIL
* Jim Breton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [000129 12:40]:
folder-hook =mutt "my_hdr From: Jim Breton [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
But if I load mutt like this:
mutt -f ~/mail/mutt
A guess (untested because I don't have time right now to test it) is
that it's noticing that "~/mail/mutt" != "=mutt",
Quick question. Do people generally find it annoying if I don't use line wrap in my
editor (vim)? I see that most other people on this list appear to be using line wrap
in their editors, I always left mine disabled figuring the client's reader/pager would
handle the wrapping. Is this a bad
* Jim Breton [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 29 13:18 -0500:
I've been doing this on my qmail system; however, qmail still puts
a "Return-Path" header on the message which indicates the local
username who called "sendmail." I haven't found any way around
this yet.
You can set the $QMAILUSER and
I am not sure why this is happening, but I would like all mail I send to
only go to "sent" folder inside of my Mailbox (~/Msgs). ~/Mail is
symlinked to ~/Msgs for Procmail.
I have a referrece of "set record = +sent"
However mail likes to go to "clug", for a mailing list, and to "Sent".
I
Yep you were right. Thanks. :)
Btw, this leads me to another question. Suppose I have two folders, one called "mutt"
and the other one is "mutt-sent"
If I want to trigger a command in the "mutt" folder but not in "mutt-sent" how can I
do this? The hook seems to make a match on either one.
Jim --
...and then Jim Breton said...
% Do people generally find it annoying if I don't use line wrap in my editor
Actually, yes. It's only because everyone here is so polite that you
haven't been flamed for it already, but it's a pretty big peeve.
Oh, wait; this is the mutt-users list. I
Sorry if anyone gets this twice. I sent it yesterday but for some reason it didn't
show up on the list, and a couple msgs I wrote just a few mins ago have already shown
up so I figure it's pretty safe to say this msg got lost somehow.
I'm also taking this opportunity to add another question.
Jim Breton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Sat, 29 Jan 2000:
If I want to trigger a command in the "mutt" folder but not in
"mutt-sent" how can I do this? The hook seems to make a match on either
one.
I've tried "mutt" and "=mutt" for the hook. There must be some regexp
pattern that would get
* Christopher Uy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [000129 20:17]:
Will lose a whitespace before the colon. I was pulling my hair out
for a while trying to find out why some of my signed messages were
coming back with bad signature errors.
I have no problems with the mentioned procmail version under
Jason Helfman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Sat, 29 Jan 2000:
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2000 12:30:04 -0600
From: Jason Helfman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: fcc's to sent
Hmmm, as a tip, if you want a remail a message originally sent to a
different address, you can b(ounce) it, no
Jim Breton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Sat, 29 Jan 2000:
As some of you may remember I just "discovered" Mutt only a few days
ago. Well, those few days have been awesome, Mutt is unbelievable!
I'm glad you think so. And I wholeheartedly agree! :-)
I do have a few questions though. :)
On Sat, Jan 29, 2000 at 02:31:20PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
...and then Jim Breton said...
% Do people generally find it annoying if I don't use line wrap in my editor
Actually, yes. It's only because everyone here is so polite that you
haven't been flamed for it already, but it's a pretty
On Sat, Jan 29, 2000 at 09:08:57PM +0100, Terje Elde wrote:
I have no problems with the mentioned procmail version under FreeBSD. I'm
able to handle both encrypted and signed messages. The only patch applied
by the FreeBSD port system to the source code itself is in recommend.c,
thus it
* Christopher Uy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [000129 23:06]:
Try signing the following in-line - without using mutt's built in PGP
handling.
E-Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
When it's signed in-line and flows through procmail, the body get
rewritten to:
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Jan 29, 2000 at 11:19:48PM +0100, Terje Elde wrote:
I'm really tired, but unless I've misunderstood something, you wanted:
I was too literal with my writing. :-) I indented the example out of
habit. :-)
Do what you did, but put it at the beginning of the line with no
indentation:
* Christopher Uy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [000130 01:25]:
On Sat, Jan 29, 2000 at 11:19:48PM +0100, Terje Elde wrote:
I'm really tired, but unless I've misunderstood something, you wanted:
I was too literal with my writing. :-) I indented the example out of
habit. :-)
Do what you did,
PGP message
2000-01-29-19:41:36 Christopher Uy:
In the mean while, adding that 'h' flag to your rule should get
you by until then.
Since the "h" makes it more efficient, it seems like a good idea to
include anyway.
Here's what I'm using these days, purely swiped from the
PGP-Notes.txt that comes with
Does anyone know if there is a hack/patch for mutt to enable the Role
selection as in Pine ? I have a need to answer email based on the sender
and respond as various addreses andneed to do so quickly. Any Ideas?
Jander Sunstar
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- "Watch the Watchers"
My two cents on formatting...
On 00-01-29 23:31, Marius Gedminas wrote:
There's one more reason: mutt and vim (and I think this is the most
Formatting made easy with vim...
Try this:
set editor=vim_for_mutt
Script vim_for_mutt:
#!/usr/local/bin/bash
if [ $# -ne 1 ]
then
echo "Usage: $0
Got this error, when trying to print
sh: mp: command not found
lpr: stdin: empty input file
Press any key to continue...
when it exited to the shell, came back, doesn't look like anything went
to spool
$record certainly is the default fcc location specification. The other
two variables that might affect things are $save_name and $force_name.
Do you have them set, perhaps? (Check with ":set ?save_name") They
both are unset by default.
I tried an fcc-hook to rememdy the problem, in my
29 matches
Mail list logo
