* David DeSimone ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [000203 22:29]:
What I want is for mutt to set the From: field when I reply to a message
to the same address as the To: field in the original message.
There is a 'reverse_name' option you can enable to do this.
You will need to make sure that your
can anyone tell me if, and how to set up mutt to be run in eterm? i was just using
xterm before, but now i would like to use eterm with trans on (if possible). when i
try to run mutt in eterm it gives me this message:
unknown terminal: /usr/bin/Eterm
check the TERM environment variable.
also
On Fri, Feb 04, 2000 at 01:07:06AM +0100, Terje Elde wrote:
New challenge:
My box is set with my email addr as [EMAIL PROTECTED], because that's what I
want when I just get lazy and pipe things into mail, and when I reply to
news postings using slrn and such. However, for mutt I want the
I am using IMAP for all messages including the inbox. I want it so that
whenever messages have been read in the inbox they are saved automatically
to the imap directory INBOX.read
I have tried setting move=yes but it doesnt move them to the folder on the
IMAP server, I have even changed it to
How may I best send an attachment to certain recipients and not others
all receiving the the same email?
thanx
--
Eric Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
00 27 21 4265311
The fact that something is "tried and tested", says nothing about whether
it has been found to actually work or not.
Eric Smith writes:
How may I best send an attachment to certain recipients and not others
all receiving the the same email?
Write the email message into a text file email.txt and
$ mutt -s subject recip1 recip2 recip3 ... email.txt
$ mutt -s subject -a attachment.file recip5 recip6 recip7
Does "{,m}" mean "{0,m}" or "{1,m}"? I don't know; I haven't looked at
the source to tell.
I would assume (from my understanding of English) that it should be
"{0,m}". If not, the manual shoould be changed to reflect this.
randy
--
Five hundred, twenty-five thousand six hundred minutes,
I'm wondering if this is a bug or something. I am sorting my index by
threads/reverse-date-received, and any time I source my .muttrc the
order of my index (message list) is reversed.
If I re-read the mailbox (c ! for example) the listing returns to
normal.
Is it supposed to do this?
How about setting:
export TERM=xterm
prior to running Mutt?
On Fri, Feb 04, 2000 at 06:19:14AM -0500, mike irwin wrote:
can anyone tell me if, and how to set up mutt to be run in eterm? i was just using
xterm before, but now i would like to use eterm with trans on (if possible). when i
I've specified my 'mailboxes' in my .muttrc, and when using 'c' to change
mailboxes, mutt (v.1.0) always defaults to the _first_ mailbox with new
mail. Is there a way to make the default the _next_ mailbox instead?
i.e. mailboxes = 'a b c d e'
I read all the mail in 'a', 'b', and 'c'. While
On Fri, Feb 04, 2000 at 06:51:25AM -0600, Christopher Uy wrote:
Does this happen with any message you sign, no matter how simple it
is? I know I had problems verifying signatures for a while, but the
problem was intermittent and ultimately turned out to be related to a
procmail bug and a
On Fri, Feb 04, 2000 at 03:01:05PM -0600, freix wrote:
send-hook .* 'unset pgp_autoencrypt'
send-hook '~t ^user@host\.domain\.com$' 'set pgp_autoencrypt'
send-hook '~t ^user@host\.domain\.com$' 'set pgp_autosign'
Is the only way I seem to be able to achieve both. Any variation of
syntax,
Sigh... I have to say, I've been discovering PGP/MIME to be quite a
problem. :-( There has to be something which can be done about this.
Here are problems I've encountered:
1) PGP/MIME signed documents don't work well with Outlook Express. In
particular, it seems to think the plaintext has to
13 matches
Mail list logo
