Re: How to change enviornment variables while in mutt

Mikko Hänninen [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Create a wrapper shell script which sets the variables and then calls qmail-inject (or the qmail sendmail wrapper if you prefer that). That's the only way to change those environment variables from the values that they had when Mutt started. I tried

Problem compiling mutt on RH5.0

Hi there! I'm running a RH5.0 box with kernel 2.2.9. Have just downloaded mutt 1.0.1, but am unable to compile because of the following error: commands.c: In function `mutt_display_message': commands.c:131: `EPIPE' undeclared (first use this function) commands.c:131: (Each undeclared

Re: Problem compiling mutt on RH5.0

Hi! On Thu, Feb 17, 2000 at 03:33:58PM +0518, Vikram Vaswani wrote: I'm running a RH5.0 box with kernel 2.2.9. Have just downloaded mutt 1.0.1, but am unable to compile because of the following error: commands.c: In function `mutt_display_message': commands.c:131: `EPIPE' undeclared (first

Re: gpg: Can't check signature: unknown digest algorithm

2000-02-16-16:51:43 Adam Sherman: I have --armor in the gpg sign command... Why is this happening? Beats the heck out of me. I'm using mutt-1.0, which has custom support or gpg, which works fine; for signing to work all I needed was (in muttrc): set pgp_default_version=gpg set

applying filter to message being replied

Hi all, I sometimes need to preprocess a message I 'm about to reply (eg. to reformat it so that long lines fit at a particular screen width) After reading the manual and performing a search in 'comp.mail.mutt', I am still puzzled, whether and how it could be done. Any clues ? Thanks in

Re: applying filter to message being replied

[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thu, 17 Feb 2000: I sometimes need to preprocess a message I 'm about to reply (eg. to reformat it so that long lines fit at a particular screen width) After reading the manual and performing a search in 'comp.mail.mutt', I am still puzzled,

Re: gpg: Can't check signature: unknown digest algorithm

On Wed, Feb 16, 2000 at 05:40:29PM -0500, Brendan Cully wrote: I have --armor in the gpg sign command... Why is this happening? Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline ˆ?¨ávB-· ¨™ø#¶Jǽ Maybe it's your key. Have you successfully encoded/decoded

Re: applying filter to message being replied

On Thu, Feb 17, 2000 at 02:53:22PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: : :I sometimes need to preprocess a message I 'm about to reply :(eg. to reformat it so that long lines fit at a particular screen width) : :After reading the manual and performing a search in 'comp.mail.mutt', :I am still

Re: GPG problem

Aha. I've found what's going wrong. The attached public key has these MIME headers: Content-Type: application/pgp-keys Content-Description: =?utf-8?Q?PGP-=C5=9Dlosilo_0x245F71FA=2E?= Content-Disposition: attachment If you don't recognise =C5=9Dlosilo, it's "key" translated into Esperanto in

Re: gpg: Can't check signature: unknown digest algorithm

On 2000-02-17 11:57:22 -0500, Adam Sherman wrote: The exact same string that I have in my muttrc for signing works fine on the command line. Of course, I can't use --batch or the passphrase fd... You want to create ascii-armored signatures. -- http://www.guug.de/~roessler/

Re: gpg: Can't check signature: unknown digest algorithm

Is there any way to find out exactly what mutt is doing? What command it runs and what the input and output is? Thanks, A. -- Adam Sherman [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1 (613) 223-5746 PGP signature

Re: GPG problem

On 2000-02-17 17:59:35 +, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote: So, either there is some over-enthusiastic internationalisation going on, or signing and RFC-2047-encoding are happening in the wrong order. The latter. Please try the attached patch. *sigh* -- http://www.guug.de/~roessler/

Re: BUFFY_SIZE option

Or, from the OpenBSD man pages: The biff command appeared in 4.0BSD. biff was Heidi Stettner's dog. He died in August 1993, at 15. which suggests an earlier etymology than the hacker's dictionary. -- -e On Wed, Feb 16, 2000 at 10:12 AM, Thomas Roessler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) typed:

Mutt on an SGI...

I just switched to Mutt from Elm yesterday, and it seems to be working fine, but I can't seem to make the color work in an SGI "winterm" window. Any help would be greatly appreciated... I tried the normal curses support, then tried slang, neither worked in my term windows... Here's my "mutt -v"

Re: gpg: Can't check signature: unknown digest algorithm

On Thu, Feb 17, 2000 at 06:56:38PM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote: On 2000-02-17 11:57:22 -0500, Adam Sherman wrote: The exact same string that I have in my muttrc for signing works fine on the command line. Of course, I can't use --batch or the passphrase fd... You want to create

color index for list mail

Is is possible to have mail from mailing lists coloured according to a color index recipe: a la color index brightmagentablack ~l # List mail thanx -- Eric Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] 00 27 21 4265311 It is easier to fix Unix than to live with NT.

Re: only show new mails / remove new tag

Hi Mikko! No, I only see really new messages, and not the whole thread where the new message is in :-/ Oh, I misunderstood you originally. As far as I know, you can't limit the view to specific but full threads only. All the limits work per-message, not per-thread. That is why I

Re: GPG problem

Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED]: So, either there is some over-enthusiastic internationalisation going on, or signing and RFC-2047-encoding are happening in the wrong order. The latter. Please try the attached patch. *sigh* That fixes it. Thanks. Edmund