Re: attachments appear as NoName

2000-03-08 Thread Martin Keseg - Sun Slovakia - SE
Lars Hecking ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : At the company where I work, it seems that most people are using dtmail or netscape mail. When I send mail with attachments from mutt, the attachments appear in those other mail clients as "NoName". If these attachments do not have a

Reply to full name from alias list

2000-03-08 Thread Mrinal Kalakrishnan
Hi, I was wondering if there is a feature by which, when I reply to, say this mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), the `To:' line should become the whole name and address from my alias file - i.e. `The Mutt Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]', instead of what the original sender put in his `To:' line.

Re: Reply to full name from alias list

2000-03-08 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Mrinal Kalakrishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wed, 08 Mar 2000: I was wondering if there is a feature by which, when I reply to, say this mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), the `To:' line should become the whole name and address from my alias file - i.e. `The Mutt Users List [EMAIL

unable to get mutt_dotlock to work

2000-03-08 Thread Jeremy Lunn
Hi, don't have to have /var/spool/mail world writable. But it doesn't seem to be working, I get get that error where it says mailbox is read-only. Here are the permissions I have: $ ls -l /var/spool/ drwxrwxr-t3 root root 1024 Mar 8 16:56 mail $ ls -l /usr/bin/mutt_dotlock

Re: Reply to full name from alias list

2000-03-08 Thread Stefan Bender
Hi, On Wed, Mar 08 2000 14:02:23 +0530 wrote Mrinal Kalakrishnan with subject "Reply to full name from alias list": I was wondering if there is a feature by which, when I reply to, say this mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), the `To:' line should become the whole name and address from my

Re: Automatically have a default body?

2000-03-08 Thread Adam Huffman
On Tue, 07 Mar 2000, Mikko Hänninen wrote: So, any solutions to this -- how could I have a default body text when sending email to this particular address? I suppose I could change the contents of $signature but that's kind of ugly, as I'd need to play with $sigdashes too (or whatever the

Re: unable to get mutt_dotlock to work

2000-03-08 Thread CaT
On Wed, Mar 08, 2000 at 05:26:53PM +1100, Jeremy Lunn wrote: Hi, don't have to have /var/spool/mail world writable. But it doesn't seem to be working, I get get that error where it says mailbox is read-only. Here are the permissions I have: $ ls -l /var/spool/ drwxrwxr-t3 root

Re: attachments appear as NoName

2000-03-08 Thread Lars Hecking
This q. was discused here few month ago and ppl from mutt-dev say thats problem of dtmail. Best on the end, dtmail from Solaris 8 distribution have this "bug" too. And that with me recommending Solaris dtmail to all DecUnix users here because Dec's dtmail sucks even worse ...

Re: Reply to full name from alias list

2000-03-08 Thread David T-G
Stefan, et al -- ...and then Stefan Bender said... % Hi, % % On Wed, Mar 08 2000 14:02:23 +0530 wrote Mrinal Kalakrishnan % with subject "Reply to full name from alias list": % % the whole name and address from my alias file - i.e. `The Mutt Users % List [EMAIL PROTECTED]', instead of what

Auto headers

2000-03-08 Thread Terje Elde
Hi all, I'm using send-hooks to make sure my From: header is set correctly when writing to mailing lists and so on, and I match it with the email I'm sending to. What I'm looking for is a way to do the same thing, but somehow doing a match on the Sender: header when replying to a person, where

Re: Auto headers

2000-03-08 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Terje Elde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wed, 08 Mar 2000: Is there a magic trick that will allow mutt to automatically dump in the Cc: and From: headers when I reply to mails on this list? I'm not entirely sure that this would work, but how about just using g(roup-reply) when answering these

Re: Introduction to Maildir (was Re: mutt and mh/procmail)

2000-03-08 Thread Philip Guenther
I wrote: Bennett Todd [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Note to the procmail-list folks, the mutt list grew this thread that spawned the question, how to deliver to Maildirs safely from an old, musty, non-maildir-supporting procmail. Various suggestions were bashed back and forth, and after I read the

Re: unable to get mutt_dotlock to work

2000-03-08 Thread Jeremy Lunn
On Wed, Mar 08, 2000 at 09:26:42PM +1100, CaT wrote: Nope. chgrp mail /var/spool/mail Whopps... how could I be so stupid not to notice that? ;-) Thanks -- Jeremy Lunn Melbourne, Australia ICQ: 19255837

Re: Introduction to Maildir (was Re: mutt and mh/procmail)

2000-03-08 Thread David W. Tamkin
OK, somebody has to say this: Philip's latest revision of the procmailrc code in question is as follows: | :0 | * conditions | { | :0 r | foldername/tmp/$XXX | | :0 air | |mv foldername/tmp/$XXX foldername/new/$XXX | } Shouldn't

[jverel@home.com: Re: Gnome Sound -- Startup wav not working]

2000-03-08 Thread John P. Verel
This is a repost. I sent it last night and it appears it got lost along the way. My appologies if you get more than one copy. John __ And yet more! (This is endlessly entertaining ;) The startup wav will launch upon reboot, if I log in as root. But, never again

Appoligies for posting mistake.

2000-03-08 Thread John P. Verel
I appologise for the error in my just posted question on GNOME. Sorry. :(

is there a way to create a group

2000-03-08 Thread Jeff Morris
Hello, I just started using mutt today and I was wondering if anyone knows a way to create a group for broadcast messages...I can't find anything in the man pages or the documentation. Thanks

Re: is there a way to create a group

2000-03-08 Thread David T-G
Jeff -- ...and then Jeff Morris said... % Hello, I just started using mutt today and I was wondering if anyone knows a way to create a group for broadcast messages...I can't find anything in the man pages or the documentation. Yes, you can; aliases can be either single or multiple. Check out