Andrew W. Nosenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tue, 30 May 2000:
Right answer is:
^(~L alice)|(~L bob)|(~L carol)
Doesn't this mean that the ^ operator is only applied to the first of
the patterns, not the 2 that follow? I guess it's a question of
precedence, but I would've expected it to
The general opinion of HTML posts on one of the lists I subscribe to is
pretty low, to the extent that folks who post using HTML get flamed
pretty well.
Recently, a gentleman made a post that was so flamed. In reviewing the
post, I find no html code in the thing, no message from mutt that I
Hello,
I am new to mutt as will be quickly apparent. I was attracted to mutt
because I can't get either gpgp or geheimnis to work with Netscape. I
would like to be able to send mail with mutt but when I have finished
composing there seems to be no way out other than to cancel the screen.
The
Dennis Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tue, 30 May 2000:
The manual says that after finishing editing (I assume that means
pressing escape?) I will be returned to the compose menu. Y sends
mail. Well not for me. I am stuck and none of the listed commands
works. q causes a recording
On Mon, May 29, 2000 at 07:55:23PM -0500, Alex Lane wrote:
One clue that makes no sense to me is that the offending post on the list
was a multipart post, one part text; the other, html. An examination of
the entire (?) message shows no multiple parts.
My read of the manual (1.2) fails to
Dennis Robertson proclaimed on mutt-users that:
composing there seems to be no way out other than to cancel the screen.
The manual says that after finishing editing (I assume that means
pressing escape?) I will be returned to the compose menu. Y sends
No. Assuming you are working with
On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 02:18:06PM +1000, Dennis Robertson wrote:
Hello,
I am new to mutt as will be quickly apparent. I was attracted to mutt
because I can't get either gpgp or geheimnis to work with Netscape. I
would like to be able to send mail with mutt but when I have finished
On Mon, May 29, 2000 at 19:55:23 -0500, Alex Lane wrote:
Recently, a gentleman made a post that was so flamed. In reviewing the
post, I find no html code in the thing, no message from mutt that I
oughta press 'v' to view an html-encoded message, nothing.
One clue that makes no sense to me
On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 02:39:38PM +1000, G.Embery wrote:
you can always make your own (setenv TERMINFO, etc.)
Beauty!
I've (temporarily) set up my own terminfo from your src file and
setenv TERMINFO and now the function keys are being recognized.
Now to make it more permanent...
On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 10:16:10AM +0200, Antoine Martin wrote:
works. q causes a recording message bottom left of the screen. Is
I think you edit your mails with vi (q permits to record a macro with vi)
no - that's vim, not vi.
vi does nothing with 'q'.
(in vile, a 'q' starts visual
On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 05:49:19AM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 10:16:10AM +0200, Antoine Martin wrote:
works. q causes a recording message bottom left of the screen. Is
I think you edit your mails with vi (q permits to record a macro with vi)
no - that's vim,
Antoine Martin proclaimed on mutt-users that:
On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 05:49:19AM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 10:16:10AM +0200, Antoine Martin wrote:
works. q causes a recording message bottom left of the screen. Is
I think you edit your mails with vi (q
On Mon, May 29, 2000 at 08:36:20PM -0400, Jeremy wrote:
On Mon, May 29, 2000 at 06:01:39PM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote:
/opt/sfw/lib is yet another non-standard location, btw - it seems that
every year Sun moves applications to a new directory.
They didn't actually move anything, they
Suresh Ramasubramanian writes:
Lars Hecking proclaimed on mutt-users that:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've got procmail sorting my messages into folders, so that each
mailing list goes to a separate folder. eg:
:0:
* ^[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IN.mutt-users
While this can be
On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 03:37:02PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Not a bad idea at all ... can anybody point me to a good howto on the
viper mode in emacs?
it sort-of comes with one (a lot of messages that tell you to use emacs
rather than viper ;-)
--
Thomas E. Dickey [EMAIL
On 2000-05-30 10:54:47 +0200, Byrial Jensen wrote:
I guess that it was a multipart/alternative post where each of the
body parts (in this case of types text/plain and text/html) is an
alternative version of the same information.
Mutt will only show you one of the parts of a
Which get's even more interesting when you have a mailing list
processor which attaches it's own signature as text/plain in the
same multipart/alternative. You see only the signature. :-(
Such software is obviously broken. But I'd probably consider a mailing
list processor broken that lets
Lars Hecking [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tue, 30 May 2000:
You missed my point. I was talking about how mutt treats message folders
after they have been filtered. One example: the bug reports from the
mutt bug tracker are filtered nicely into the incoming mutt-dev folder,
but mutt doesn't
Indeed. Didn't we already go over this on the mutt-dev list and
come up with the specs for the way the lists handling *should* work?
Yep. I was just too lazy to dig out the references ...
It's just that nobody's done it yet. ;-)
(Hmm, maybe you're not on mutt-dev...)
You should know
On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 03:37:02PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
- Antoine Martin proclaimed on mutt-users that:
-
- On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 05:49:19AM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote:
- On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 10:16:10AM +0200, Antoine Martin wrote:
-works. q causes a recording message
Hi!
...and then [EMAIL PROTECTED] said...
% Why build with ssl?
Well, I assume you're not looking for an answer like "so it's available",
so...
SSL stands for something like Secure Socket Layer, and it's a method of
encryption for your network traffic between you and a server. It's what
web
Lars Hecking proclaimed on mutt-users that:
You missed my point. I was talking about how mutt treats message folders
after they have been filtered. One example: the bug reports from the
mutt bug tracker are filtered nicely into the incoming mutt-dev folder,
but mutt doesn't know that these
On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 11:56:24AM +0200, Antoine Martin wrote:
no - that's vim, not vi.
vi does nothing with 'q'.
(in vile, a 'q' starts visual selection ;-)
Autant pour moi ;)
In fact, I use solaris 5.7 with vim, vi is aliased to vim ;)
I'm on HP/UX 10.20, and I have the
On Tue, 30 May 2000, Michael Soulier wrote:
On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 11:56:24AM +0200, Antoine Martin wrote:
In fact, I use solaris 5.7 with vim, vi is aliased to vim ;)
I'm on HP/UX 10.20, and I have the same alias. ;-)
as a practical matter, I've found it's best to avoid the aliases
Hello.
Is there an easy (and efficient) way of removing duplicated messages from
my mailboxes (keeping only one copy of them)? Note that I am talking
about old messages already saved in the mailboxes, not the new messages
being delivered now to the mailboxes.
Thanks.
Romildo
--
Prof. José
Newbie POP question - I've configured my Redhat 6.1 system at home
to use Mutt 1.2 *with* POP enabled. I have the POP options popluated
with the proper values for my ISP, and the "G" function to
retrieve mail from my ISP works fine, but how do I send mail?
Mail that I'm sending doesn't seem to
On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 10:35:29AM -0400, Hardy Merrill wrote:
Newbie POP question - I've configured my Redhat 6.1 system at home
to use Mutt 1.2 *with* POP enabled. I have the POP options popluated
with the proper values for my ISP, and the "G" function to
retrieve mail from my ISP works
* Jose Romildo Malaquias ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [000530 09:35]:
Is there an easy (and efficient) way of removing duplicated messages from
my mailboxes (keeping only one copy of them)? Note that I am talking
about old messages already saved in the mailboxes, not the new messages
being delivered
It seems mutt's default behavior when replying to a message is to only put
the sender in the To: header. Is there a way to add Cc: recipients as
well?
-Chris
--
---
Christopher A. Woodfield[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Finger for public PGP key 0xB887618B - email
On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 04:49:29PM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
Configure sendmail, postfix, exim, qmail (the MTA of your choice).
plugIn
Setting up qmail for a dial-up host is IMHO very easy, there are
excellent documents at the qmail page http://www.qmail.org . My home
box is running
Hardy Merrill:
Mail that I'm sending doesn't seem to get out - I think it's
sitting in my "outbox". What more do I need to do?
put ":your-isp's-smtp-(mail)-server-name" into control/smtproutes, if you
use the standard setup, that should get rid of your mail.
--
clemens
It seems mutt's default behavior when replying to a message is to
only put
the sender in the To: header. Is there a way to add Cc: recipients as
well?
Are you using "r" to reply ?? If so, try "R" instead ;-) (look through
the Muttrc file for "clues" -- "R" is for a "group-reply")
Regards,
Chris Woodfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tue, 30 May 2000:
It seems mutt's default behavior when replying to a message is to only put
the sender in the To: header. Is there a way to add Cc: recipients as
well?
Yes, use the group-reply function, by default this is accessed with the
"g" key.
use the good ol procmail rules: (see "man procmail")
:0 Whc: msgid.lock
| formail -D 8192 msgid.cache
:0 a:
duplicates
Then dump the mailbox through procmail (make sure that nobody will try
to deliver to the mailbox while you're doing this...)
formail -s procmail
On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 10:35:29AM -0400, Hardy Merrill wrote:
Newbie POP question - I've configured my Redhat 6.1 system at home
cool :)
to use Mutt 1.2 *with* POP enabled. I have the POP options popluated
with the proper values for my ISP, and the "G" function to
retrieve mail from my ISP
On 30-May-2000, Lars Hecking wrote:
Which get's even more interesting when you have a mailing list
processor which attaches it's own signature as text/plain in the
same multipart/alternative. You see only the signature. :-(
IIRC, ezmlm does this. The reason you only see the signature is
Well it should be lurking in the mail queue /var/spool/mqueue.
The "sendmail" or some other MTA should carry it away next time
you hook up to the internet.
Martin Holland has some good stuff on setting up both fetchmail
and sendmail (on RedHat too)
http://www.noether.freeserve.co.uk
If
Hall Stevenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tue, 30 May 2000:
Are you using "r" to reply ?? If so, try "R" instead ;-) (look through
the Muttrc file for "clues" -- "R" is for a "group-reply")
I don't think "R" is the default binding for group-reply, "g" is.
But the binding can of course be
Hall Stevenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tue, 30 May 2000:
Are you using "r" to reply ?? If so, try "R" instead ;-) (look
through
the Muttrc file for "clues" -- "R" is for a "group-reply")
I don't think "R" is the default binding for group-reply, "g" is.
But the binding can of course be
I really like the ability in mutt to be able to reply to (thereby
quoting) multiple messages in a single response. Also, the threading
of messages in wonderful. However, when I reply to multiple messages,
often it picks up the "References" from a message other than the one I
want, and
At 11:12 -0500 30 May 2000, Ronny Haryanto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
an RFC (about multipart or MIME, I can't remember exactly) suggests
that the last text/plain part be shown if all of the parts are of the
same type. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
Actually, mailers are supposed to prefer the
Bob Bell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tue, 30 May 2000:
Is there any way to specify which message should be used to set
the "References" field?
Not that I know of.
I wonder how something like this could be implemented? It would be
quite unpractical to keep a list of tagging order or
At 08:07 -0400 30 May 2000, David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
% Unfortunately, there's no way to execute send-hooks dependent on the
% message you are replying to.
This is something that has been bothering me for a while... If that's
the case, then why does
send-hook .
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
First, you have to set your "smart host" in /etc/sendmail.cf
So, put a line of this kind (in /etc/sendmail.cf) :
# "Smart" relay host (may be null)
DSsmtp.worldonline.fr
yes, this is vital. i had this configured for ages until i found out that
the protocol designator
Chris Woodfield:
It seems mutt's default behavior when replying to a message is to only put
the sender in the To: header. Is there a way to add Cc: recipients as
well?
the group-reply, documented in the manual and in the quickref screen
launched by '?', is commonly bound to 'g'. just check
Thanks to all who answered my question. Gee, mutt is even better than I
originally thought!
Cheers...
--
Alex Lane * Webster, Texas, USA * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * www.galexi.com/alex/
DH/DSS PGP keyID: 0xD94803CD -*- RSA PGP keyID: 0xCABD6FF9
It's a damn poor mind that can only think of one
On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 08:55:11PM +0300, Mikko Hnninen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder how something like this could be implemented? It would be
quite unpractical to keep a list of tagging order or anything like that.
Maybe something like "if the current message is tagged, use that as a
Jacob Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tue, 30 May 2000:
Right... I think you want something that acts on tagged messages and saves
them to existing mailboxes using save-hooks if they exist, or otherwise to
the received folder if there's no existing mailbox.
You don't need to have this to be
At 2:21 PM EDT on May 30 Alex Lane sent off:
I'm only just now noticing that one of the mailing lists I'm subscribed
to appears to truncate the "-- " that separates the message from the
message signature to simply "--".
I've got to believe this is not proper behavior on the part of the
Andreas Wessel:
What´s it with these "X"-headers anyway?
Does there have to be an X before any self entered header?
RFC?
the common use for it these days is to includer user-info in the headers
(e.g. my pgp-key#). they coexist peacefully with the rfc822 headers until
religion claims it's
On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 03:27:11PM -0400, Bob Bell wrote:
My thoughts exactly. I'd tag all relevant messages, and then just
hit ';g' or whatever over the message where I want the followups to
appear. This would be a really nice feature, as my threading is
currently getting messed up...
Randall --
...and then Randall Hopper said...
% manual.txt
% ~l message is addressed to a known mailing list
%
% If I mark my lists with "lists" (known) as before, my ~l hooks do not
% enage. But if I mark them with "subscribe" (subscribed), then my ~l hooks
% "do" engage.
Bob, et al --
...and then Bob Bell said...
%
% Is there any way to specify which message should be used to set
% the "References" field?
In my limited experience, mutt figures its Refs: and I-R-T: fields
from the first message in the tagged list, probably based on the current
sort order.
Hello..
i have a problem to set mbox type which mutt will send it.. It works for
sendmail w/ mbox but qmail w/ maildir.. it does not deliver any mail to
qmail server.. Anyone knows how to configure mutt??
"-t" flag looks like configuring mbox type...But I could not
find correct flagment...
hara
clemensF proclaimed on mutt-users that:
Andreas Wessel:
What´s it with these "X"-headers anyway?
Does there have to be an X before any self entered header?
RFC?
the common use for it these days is to includer user-info in the headers
(e.g. my pgp-key#). they coexist peacefully with the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] proclaimed on mutt-users that:
# "Smart" relay host (may be null)
DSsmtp.worldonline.fr
OK so far.
But that's not all. As you have a dialup workstation, each time you connect to your
ISP, your IP address will change.
So, you have to tell Sendmail you official domain name.
56 matches
Mail list logo
