Using a large mallet, DAve whacked out:
Any pointers to a current manual? The one I have came from the webiste I
believe and is dated Apr 1998. Aha, /usr/local/docs/mutt/html, I'll get
reading... then I'll check into everyones suggestions.
You could also look at
On Fri, Jul 28, 2000 at 03:17:18AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mutt's IMAP4 support is good and implements the IMAP4 'philosopy' much
better than most MUAs in my opinion. The only MUAs that I have found
which are in the same league (vis-a-vis IMAP support) are:-
tkRat
FYI: It looks like I may finally have the time to work on muttzilla
again. I'm setting up muttzilla with sourceforge. -users and
-announce mailing lists are up, but the CVS repository hasn't been
populated yet. Hopefully there will be a slightly more user-friendly
version available soon.
I now use PGP exclusively for swapping personal mail with other Mutt
users.
One wish I have is for there to be an alternative way to specify the
subject such that it is stored and retrieved from the body and not the
header, so it can be PGPed.
Is there any way to do this? If not,
On Sat, Jul 29, 2000 at 05:43:10PM -0400, Randall Hopper muttered:
I now use PGP exclusively for swapping personal mail with other Mutt
users.
One wish I have is for there to be an alternative way to specify the
subject such that it is stored and retrieved from the body and not the
I believe I know my problem now. I use ssmtp to send my mail from my laptop
to my mail server. The ssmtp man page states that the -f flag is only
honored *if* the 'From:' field in the e-mail header is not present.
Since the Mutt manual states that 'envelope_from' is sent to sendmail
via the
DAve [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Sat, 29 Jul 2000:
I believe I know my problem now. I use ssmtp to send my mail from my laptop
to my mail server. The ssmtp man page states that the -f flag is only
honored *if* the 'From:' field in the e-mail header is not present.
Oops. That's a pretty
On 2000.07.29, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
"Randall Hopper" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One wish I have is for there to be an alternative way to specify the
subject such that it is stored and retrieved from the body and not the
header, so it can be PGPed.
I'd like this, too, and so would
I'm just upgraded to the latest mutt (1.2.4) after running with an
ancient version forever (pre-1.0). I find that the list handling is
broken --- according to the documentation on www.mutt.org, nothing
much there has really changed --- the default index_format has %L in
it, so the list name
Alan Batie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Sat, 29 Jul 2000:
I find that the list handling is broken
Any suggestions on fixing this short of digging into the code?
Yes, read doc/README.UPGRADE. :-)
In short: replace all the "lists" statements in your .muttrc with
"subscribe".
Regards,
Mikko
--
Hi, folks --
When running 0.95.4i and attaching a file, mutt defaulted to searching my
current directory. Under 1.2.4i mutt now apparently defaults to my
$folder even for ordinary file attachments. Although surprising, that's
not so bad, because I can simply start my filename with ./ and then
On Sunday, 30 July 2000 at 00:32, David T-G wrote:
Hi, folks --
When running 0.95.4i and attaching a file, mutt defaulted to searching my
current directory. Under 1.2.4i mutt now apparently defaults to my
$folder even for ordinary file attachments. Although surprising, that's
not so bad,
12 matches
Mail list logo
