On Sat, Sep 23, 2000 at 01:33:36 -0700, Peter Jaques wrote:
i'm looking for some command that will mark all messages in a current
mailbox as being read, without having to actually read them. sort of like
^R but for an entire mailbox ( not dependent on threading). is there a
such?
Tag all
On 2000.09.23, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
"Byrial Jensen" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tag all messages, mark the tagged messages read, and finally untag
them. Can be bound to macro if you like, for example:
macro index R "T~Aenter;WN;t" "Mark all messages read"
This is correct, of course,
Jens Askengren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Sat, 23 Sep 2000:
Yes, I'm suggesting that mutt needs a GUI.
Last time I asked about this, I was told to check out "Balsa".
(Which I haven't yet done, though it's on my list of things to do
any decade now...)
Regards,
Mikko
--
// Mikko Hänninen, aka.
On Sat, Sep 23, 2000 at 04:02:44PM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
Jens Askengren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Sat, 23 Sep 2000:
Yes, I'm suggesting that mutt needs a GUI.
Last time I asked about this, I was told to check out "Balsa".
(Which I haven't yet done, though it's on my list of things
Jens --
...and then Jens Askengren said...
%
% Yes, I'm suggesting that mutt needs a GUI. I know that some of you might
Gaack! *sputter* *wheeze* cough cough
'scuse me
% want to edit your .procmailrc after reading this post. Please do so, but
% read this first =)
Hey, if this is any
Jens Askengren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Sat, 23 Sep 2000:
Last time I asked about this, I was told to check out "Balsa".
(Which I haven't yet done, though it's on my list of things to do
any decade now...)
There are a lot of GUI clients out there for X11. But unfortunately, most
of
On 2000.09.23, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
"Jens Askengren" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A GUI-mutt could be implemented by separating mutt into a backend and
several frontends (curses, X11, etc). The frontend could be selected at
compiletime, or loaded as a plugin/dll/.so-lib at runtime.
Well, a GUI does have some advantages:
- One can read HTML-mail... OK, people should not be sending html, but
really a lot of (Microsoft)-users, do. It would be quite nice to view
the layout they intended with fonts inline images.
- The resolution is usally much more, so you can have more text on
Jens Askengren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Sat, 23 Sep 2000:
Yes, I'm suggesting that mutt needs a GUI.
Not to nitpick, but no. mutt does not need a GUI. It'd probably be more
accurate to say that you -want- a GUI for mutt. To this day, mutt is easily
the most powerful, configurable, fast
