Re: Matching the '^From ' line (using mbox format)

2000-11-09 Thread Mikko Hänninen
David Alban [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wed, 08 Nov 2000: Sure does. Interesting. I didn't think the "^From " line *was* a header. :-) Technically it isn't, it's part of the mbox folder format... But I guess Mutt does treat it that way, if it's present. The "^From " trick will only work

'mailboxes' skips mailbox

2000-11-09 Thread Thorsten Haude
Hi list, I use 'mailboxes `find ~/Mail -type f -print | \ grep -Ev '(log|backup|sent)' | xargs`' to tell Mutt about my mailboxes. One of them is not found though. It is displayed if I enter the find command in a shell, GKrellM checks it perfectly, but Mutt ignores it. What is wrong? tia

Re: Matching the '^From ' line (using mbox format)

2000-11-09 Thread Jan Houtsma
On Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 07:16:32PM -0800, David Alban wrote: At 2000/11/08/20:18 -0500 Jim Toth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: save-hook '~h "^From some-list-owner@"' =some-list (where ~h is in the headers somewhere) should also work, although I don't know if it works on 0.95 (which you seem

Re: mailing list replies...what about?

2000-11-09 Thread Timothy Legant
On Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 04:14:24PM -0800, Robert Sweet wrote: On Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 11:32:02AM -0800, Robert Sweet wrote: [snip...] What about cc: to the poster too? If the poster is subscribed to the list, s/he probably doesn't want to receive two copies of the mail; your (L)ist reply

Re: sorting by threads

2000-11-09 Thread Wouter Verheijen
I haven't specified $folder at all in my muttrc, so it defaults to ~/Mail. I tried removing the `=' but without success. Nasty thing it is... -- Wouter Verheijen [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: sorting by threads

2000-11-09 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Wouter Verheijen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wed, 08 Nov 2000: I haven't specified $folder at all in my muttrc, so it defaults to ~/Mail. I tried removing the `=' but without success. Nasty thing it is... Hmm, ok. Strange. Can you get any folder-hooks to execute at all? Does folder-hook

Re: sorting by threads

2000-11-09 Thread Wouter Verheijen
On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 07:13:55PM +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote: Can you get any folder-hooks to execute at all? Does folder-hook . set sort=threads No, this doesn't work either. It simply doesn't match, although putting some garbage (like folder-hook . set asdf) gives me an error message.

Re: sorting by threads

2000-11-09 Thread Michael Tatge
Wouter Verheijen muttered: On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 07:13:55PM +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote: Can you get any folder-hooks to execute at all? Does folder-hook . set sort=threads No, this doesn't work either. It simply doesn't match, although putting some garbage (like folder-hook . set

Re: sorting by threads

2000-11-09 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Wouter Verheijen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thu, 09 Nov 2000: folder-hook . set sort=threads No, this doesn't work either. It simply doesn't match, although putting some garbage (like folder-hook . set asdf) gives me an error message. It looks like the sort command doesn't do anything...

Re: mixmaster

2000-11-09 Thread Erwin Kaiser
On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 06:40:33AM +0930, Brian Salter-Duke rearranged the electrons to read: On Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 02:08:43PM +0100, Erwin Kaiser wrote: In the manual I read about sending mail via mixmaster but I cannot activate this feature. How does it work? TIA Erwin Did you

saving to folder depending on Reply-To: ?

2000-11-09 Thread Greg Whitlock
Hello, I've been looking for this in the manual and haven't found anything appropriate so here goes I have certain lists that I'm subscribed to (via listserv) that has the Reply-To: set automatically back to the list and not the sender. When I hit 's' to save a message from these lists

Re: saving to folder depending on Reply-To: ?

2000-11-09 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Greg Whitlock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thu, 09 Nov 2000: Actually, the whole Reply-To: point may be a red herring but it's the only difference I see right off between the lists. Any ideas on how to get those messages to save like (what I view as) normal? I didn't see a way to do it with

Re: saving to folder depending on Reply-To: ?

2000-11-09 Thread David Alban
Greg, At 2000/11/09/15:28 -0500 Greg Whitlock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I didn't see a way to do it with save-hook but it could be that I just don't know how. Do you mean "is there a save-hook definition I can use to get these messages

Re: sorting by threads

2000-11-09 Thread Ben Reser
On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 09:31:09PM +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote: Well, the hook is executing, if you get the error. I would try what was suggested in the other mail, create a minimal .muttrc and try to get it work with that. Yes the hook is executing. But I'm guessing he has another hook that

Re: N in folder list

2000-11-09 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Mike E [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tue, 31 Oct 2000: I've been trying to get the new flag to work in my folder list, to show me which folders have new messages. For some reason, no folder ever gets a 'N' flag, regardless of whether or not it contains new messages. Shouldn't this work right out

Re: sorting by threads

2000-11-09 Thread Wouter Verheijen
i [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; from [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 01:26:17PM -0800 On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 01:26:17PM -0800, Ben Reser wrote: I.E

Re: sorting by threads

2000-11-09 Thread Ben Reser
On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 11:02:18PM +0100, Wouter Verheijen wrote: Right! This was exactly what I had. Thanks. I assumed that the dot was just the default, which gets executed when there was no other match. It is not mentioned in the documentation that this order is important. Maybe this

Re: sorting by threads

2000-11-09 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Wouter Verheijen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thu, 09 Nov 2000: It is not mentioned in the documentation that this order is important. Maybe this should be added? Well, order is significant for more or less all hooks. I don't remember if this is stated anywhere in the manual specifically, if

Re: sorting by threads

2000-11-09 Thread Harold Oga
On Fri, Nov 10, 2000 at 12:49:57AM +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote: Wouter Verheijen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thu, 09 Nov 2000: It is not mentioned in the documentation that this order is important. Maybe this should be added? Well, order is significant for more or less all hooks. I don't

Re: folder-hook set ?

2000-11-09 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Jeff Howie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thu, 09 Nov 2000: folder-hook . set sort=threads \ index_format="%3C/%m %Z %{%Y-%m-%d %H:%M} %-15.15F %s" Which gives me a startup error '%Z: unknown variable' This is a quoting issue. Put '' quotes around the whole

Re: folder-hook set ?

2000-11-09 Thread Jeff Howie
On Fri, Nov 10, 2000 at 04:19:16AM +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote: Jeff Howie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thu, 09 Nov 2000: folder-hook . set sort=threads \ index_format="%3C/%m %Z %{%Y-%m-%d %H:%M} %-15.15F %s" Which gives me a startup error '%Z: unknown variable' This is a

Re: N in folder list

2000-11-09 Thread Bruce DeVisser
On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 11:42:35PM +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote: Mike E [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tue, 31 Oct 2000: I've been trying to get the new flag to work in my folder list, to show me which folders have new messages. For some reason, no folder ever gets a 'N' flag, regardless of

Re: N in folder list

2000-11-09 Thread Mike E
* Bruce DeVisser ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 11:42:35PM +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote: Mike E [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tue, 31 Oct 2000: I've been trying to get the new flag to work in my folder list, to show me which folders have new messages. For some reason, no