recompile for updated ncurses?

2001-08-18 Thread Ken Weingold
I built mutt with ncurses 5.0, and just updated ncurses to 5.2. Any reason to recompile mutt? Thanks. -Ken

Re: test command in mailcap not recognizing %s

2001-08-18 Thread Gary Johnson
On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 12:29:09AM -0400, Joel Hammer wrote: I don't know how to make mutt distinguish between pdf and word (doc) documents. They both show up as octet stream. So, I am trying to put a test command into my mailcap file to test which type of file is attached, doc or pdf. I am

Re: recompile for updated ncurses?

2001-08-18 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Ken Weingold mutt [18/08/01 03:06 -0400]: I built mutt with ncurses 5.0, and just updated ncurses to 5.2. Any reason to recompile mutt? Reason? See if something breaks - if so recompile (nothing should, ideally) -suresh

Re: Make it simple?

2001-08-18 Thread Michael P. Soulier
On Fri, Aug 17, 2001 at 05:17:40PM -0400, Adam Shostack wrote: Hi, I just upgraded to mutt 1.2.5, and its insisting on coloring everything. I managed to get close to what I want by commenting HAVE_COLOR out of config.h, but now I still get things like underlining quoted text, boldface in

Re: mutt porting to Max OS-X ?

2001-08-18 Thread Jean-Sebastien Morisset
msg.pgp

Re: recompile for updated ncurses?

2001-08-18 Thread Lars Hecking
Ken Weingold writes: I built mutt with ncurses 5.0, and just updated ncurses to 5.2. Any reason to recompile mutt? I'm following the ncurses snapshots and don't usually recompile mutt, but in your case, I'd recommend it if you are using shared libs for ncurses. If you check out the top of

Indent_string..

2001-08-18 Thread David Röhr
When I answer a mail mutt always put as quote on the last mail according to the indent_string in my .muttrc. I want only when no other has replyed, but if there already is a then i want it to become just How do I fix this? /d -- Bob Barker: Which one of these lovely womanoids will

Re: recompile for updated ncurses?

2001-08-18 Thread Thomas E. Dickey
On Sat, 18 Aug 2001, Ken Weingold wrote: I built mutt with ncurses 5.0, and just updated ncurses to 5.2. Any reason to recompile mutt? perhaps (with 5.1/5.2, I added a function assume_default_colors(), which you may want to configure against if you weren't using the default colors support in

procmail

2001-08-18 Thread Azzazel
Hi, Does anybody use procmail for sorting incoming mail? proc won't sort messages (I've tired test explained on faq page). Or, maybe I shell use fetchmail for receiving messagess? Please help, I'm a complete beginer, not only in mutt but also in Linux (: [p.s. ang my english is terrible] --

Re: procmail

2001-08-18 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Azzazel mutt [18/08/01 20:26 +0200]: Does anybody use procmail for sorting incoming mail? Several of us do. proc won't sort messages (I've tired test explained on faq page). Or, maybe I shell use fetchmail for receiving messagess? Please help, I'm a complete beginer, not only in mutt but

Re: recompile for updated ncurses?

2001-08-18 Thread Ken Weingold
On Sat, Aug 18, 2001, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: Ken Weingold mutt [18/08/01 03:06 -0400]: I built mutt with ncurses 5.0, and just updated ncurses to 5.2. Any reason to recompile mutt? Reason? See if something breaks - if so recompile (nothing should, ideally) Because of

Re: pgp

2001-08-18 Thread David Rock
On Fri, Aug 17, 2001 at 07:04:31PM -0700, Will Yardley wrote: David Rock wrote: You should be able to remove his key from your keyring. I would think that would fix it. yes that's what i would think too. but it doesn't appear to be there as far as i can tell (again i'm not a huge pgp

Re: mailboxes and new mail notification

2001-08-18 Thread Morten Brix Pedersen
Hi Mark, On Sun, Aug 19, 2001 at 01:59:34AM +0100, Mark Hill wrote: Hello, I'm trying to get mutt to tell me if there is any new mail in an mbox folder. AFAIK, new messages come up when I go to change in to another dir, but instead mutt says 'mailboxes [0]' (or something like that.)

Re: procmail

2001-08-18 Thread Joel Hammer
proc won't sort messages (I've tired test explained on faq page). Or, maybe I shell use fetchmail for receiving messagess? Do you have a .forward file in your home directory? [jlh@cc846558-a jlh]$ cat .forward |exec /usr/bin/procmail Then, do you have mistakes in your .procmailrc file.

Re: mailboxes and new mail notification

2001-08-18 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Mark Hill mutt [19/08/01 01:59 +0100]: #mailboxes mailboxes ! mailboxes =blackbox Try mailboxes `echo $HOME/Mail/*` -suresh

Re: procmail

2001-08-18 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Joel Hammer mutt [18/08/01 21:50 -0400]: Now, I forget just how you make your mail agent honor the .forward file. That Your MTA you mean? See, if you run sendmail on linux, there's no need to have a .forward, as sendmail uses procmail as the LDA (local delivery agent). Then the usual reason

Re: procmail

2001-08-18 Thread Lars Hecking
Then the usual reason why .forward is ignored is unsafe permissions on your homedir or your .forward / .procmailrc (should not be group-writeable). Unless you have one group per user, and procmail was configured accordingly. As appears to be the case with at least one major Linux distro.

Re: mailboxes and new mail notification

2001-08-18 Thread Ken Weingold
On Sun, Aug 19, 2001, Mark Hill wrote: On Sun, Aug 19, 2001 at 07:26:11AM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: Mark Hill mutt [19/08/01 01:59 +0100]: #mailboxes mailboxes ! mailboxes =blackbox Try mailboxes `echo $HOME/Mail/*` -suresh Okay, I'm not too sure if