On Wed, 31 Oct 2001, Doug Kearns wrote:
You could replace the awk invocation with +'/^$/+1'
Thanks for the information. May I ask you another question regarding awk,
please? My wife is a linguist and she would for some of her research
retrograde sort (i.e., sorting by words taken from the
Hi,
Could you tell me how to make the To: address set to the mailing
list addres when I try to make a reply to a mailing list?
I always see the writer's address in the To: when I make a reply.
Thanks,
--
YOON, Joo-Yung / ArBaGo Int'l
KOREA 420-111 BooChun WonMi-1-Dong 1-28 (GunYong Bldg.
YOON, Joo-Yung wrote:
Could you tell me how to make the To: address set to the mailing
list addres when I try to make a reply to a mailing list?
I always see the writer's address in the To: when I make a reply.
subscribe to the list (man muttrc) in your .muttrc and then use 'L' to
On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 01:07:12PM +0900, YOON, Joo-Yung (dis)graced my inbox with:
Could you tell me how to make the To: address set to the mailing
list addres when I try to make a reply to a mailing list?
Go into your .muttrc and configure your mailing lists with the subscribe
command. Read
Hello, list. I've a problem sending emails like this one:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Juan Alonso Hernández [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Bcc:
Subject: Test
Reply-To:
Test msg
hehehe,
thanks
aloha,
dave
On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 12:38:15PM +1100, Doug Kearns wrote:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2001 at 07:42:30PM -0500, Matej Cepl wrote:
On Wed, 31 Oct 2001, Doug Kearns wrote:
You could replace the awk invocation with +'/^$/+1'
Thanks for the information. May I ask
Hi,
I would like to apply different From: address for every mailing lists.
For example,
Message to A mailing list has From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message to B mailing list has From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can I do that by
send-hook A set [EMAIL PROTECTED]
send-hook B set [EMAIL PROTECTED]
set
Hello.
I have a problem with sending mails through external MTA.
How can i set up mutt to send through another host?
best Regards
--
Kr00lik
Is it the fact that the U.S. government doesn't respect human rights that
makes you so upset? If so, I'm all behind you.
Jesper
* On Tue Oct 30, Dave Price wrote:
I find your X-echelon header to be in INCREDIBLY poor taste!!! Change
you settings or post somewhere else.
aloha,
dave
snip
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a problem with sending mails through external MTA.
How can i set up mutt to send through another host?
you can't.
w
--
GPG Public Key:
http://infinitejazz.net/will/pgp/
Hi,
I would like to apply different From: address for every mailing lists.
For example,
Message to A mailing list has From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message to B mailing list has From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can I do that by
send-hook A set [EMAIL PROTECTED]
send-hook B set [EMAIL PROTECTED]
set
On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 10:41:29AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello.
I have a problem with sending mails through external MTA.
How can i set up mutt to send through another host?
I think you have to ask the manager of the external MTA to
allow your host to get relayed.
best Regards
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can I do that by
send-hook A set [EMAIL PROTECTED]
send-hook B set [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Use myhdr instead, $from does not work unfortunately.
send-hook . 'unmy_hdr From:'
send-hook . 'my_hdr From: Doughnut [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
send-hook '~L mutt' 'my_hdr
Will Yardley mutt [31/10/01 04:43 -0800]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a problem with sending mails through external MTA.
How can i set up mutt to send through another host?
you can't.
The best way is to either
[1] Set up your local MTA to smarthost through another host (see
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mutt [31/10/01 21:43 +0900]:
I would like to apply different From: address for every mailing lists.
For example,
Message to A mailing list has From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message to B mailing list has From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can I do that by
send-hook A set [EMAIL
Jesper Holmberg mutt [31/10/01 13:44 +0100]:
Is it the fact that the U.S. government doesn't respect human rights that
makes you so upset? If so, I'm all behind you.
It is the fact that this X-Echelon header game has become rather childish
that makes the guy so upset, I guess.
* On Tue Oct
On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 08:31:02PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Jesper Holmberg mutt [31/10/01 13:44 +0100]:
Is it the fact that the U.S. government doesn't respect human rights that
makes you so upset? If so, I'm all behind you.
It is the fact that this X-Echelon header game has
Cliff Sarginson mutt [31/10/01 16:41 +0100]:
Am I missing out on something here ?
What is the X-Echelon header when it is at home ?
Echelon is supposedly the CIA's s00p3r s3kr17 new gadget to snoop on people's
email. So, lots of 31337 d00dz here like to put in X-Echelon headers with
echelon
Eric Van Buggenhaut [EMAIL PROTECTED] said something to this effect on 10/30/2001:
Now, what I'm trying to do is:
I have a IN.perso folder where all my private e-mails arrive
(thru procmail). This folder has a mbox defined in muttrc:
mbox-hook IN.perso ~/Mail/perso
I can easily get
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 04:41:50PM +0100,
Cliff Sarginson formed electrons and emmitted this:
[*]Am I missing out on something here ?
[*]What is the X-Echelon header when it is at home ?
[*]Will my teenage son think his dad is a cool dude
Hi,
I want to run two Mutts in parallel.
1. Is there any problem except writing mailboxes?
2. Does '-R' read-only all mailboxes or just the one I name in the
command line? Is there another way to do it?
tia,
Thorsten
--
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little
temporary
Thus spake Peter L. Berghold ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
So, what I am saying is the whole idea of an X-Echelon header is a
game that was funny the first 99 times it was done and like many over
told jokes has gotten pretty lame. Don't waste time on it.
For that matter, don't waste time on
On 2001-10-31 Thorsten Haude wrote:
I want to run two Mutts in parallel.
1. Is there any problem except writing mailboxes?
No, I often do that.
2. Does '-R' read-only all mailboxes or just the one I name in the
command line? Is there another way to do it?
Only the named ones.
But you
On Wed 31-Oct-2001 at 11:01:00AM -0500, Peter L. Berghold wrote:
Putting an X-Echelon header in your email with provocative words in it
supposedly causes the NSA computers to waste cycles processing them.
If you just want to waste cycles on other peoples computers, try this:
* Bruno Postle [EMAIL PROTECTED] [31-10-2001 17:50]:
| On Wed 31-Oct-2001 at 11:01:00AM -0500, Peter L. Berghold wrote:
|
| Putting an X-Echelon header in your email with provocative words in it
| supposedly causes the NSA computers to waste cycles processing them.
|
| If you just want to
On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 09:18:41AM -, Matej Cepl wrote:
You could replace the awk invocation with +'/^$/+1'
Thanks for the information. May I ask you another question regarding awk,
please?
And so I did -- but unfortunately to the list. Sorry for that.
Matej
--
Matej Cepl, [EMAIL
Moin,
so trifft man sich wieder.
* Christoph Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-10-31 17:43]:
On 2001-10-31 Thorsten Haude wrote:
1. Is there any problem except writing mailboxes?
No, I often do that.
Do you have any special provisions in this respect?
2. Does '-R' read-only all mailboxes or just
Here's another. All the other PGP-signed emails in the thead parsed
fine. Just this one was like this, every time.
--
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 31 11:18:42 2001
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter
* Ken Weingold [EMAIL PROTECTED] [31-10-2001 18:13]:
| Here's another. All the other PGP-signed emails in the thead parsed
| fine. Just this one was like this, every time.
This one was not pgp/mime signed, but traditional. Did you press
escP when this happened?
| From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed
Thorsten Haude wrote:
1. Is there any problem except writing mailboxes?
No, I often do that.
Do you have any special provisions in this respect?
I'm not Christoph, but I often use several mutt's at the same time, too.
I even modify mails in both of the mut's, and I never got problems. I
Folks,
could you please stop this entirely off-topic, silly, and
unnecessary discussion?
If someone finds an X-Echelon header cool, that's his business.
If someone else finds that particular one tasteless, he's of course
free to complain about it IN PRIVATE MAIL, or in alt.flame.
But,
* Rob 'Feztaa' Park ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hey guys, I've been having this terrible problem with email spam and I
was wondering if you guys have similar problems, and if so, what you do
about them.
I vote for taking the spammer out and having him/her/them drawn and
quartered.
Anyway, I
Hi,
* Volker Moell [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-10-31 18:18]:
Thorsten Haude wrote:
1. Is there any problem except writing mailboxes?
Do you have any special provisions in this respect?
I'm not Christoph, but I often use several mutt's at the same time, too.
I even modify mails in both of the mut's,
Thorsten Haude wrote:
I can see me appending mail, eg. when I send one; but I usually don't
modify the mails in my mboxes. What do I miss here?
Argh... ok, this was confusing. What I really meant was, you can get
into trouble, when you append two mails to one mailbox *at the same
time*. But
please can sombody tell me how to enable colors in mutt
i have a color xterm and vim has colors in it
what must i do for mutt ot work here also
TIA JJK
_
/| John J Kearney |\
|
* John J Kearney ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) babbled:
please can sombody tell me how to enable colors in mutt
here's what i use.
## =
## Color definitions
## =
color attachment white magenta
color body cyan default ftp://[^ ]*
color body brightgreen
Hi,
* Volker Moell [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-10-31 18:50]:
Argh... ok, this was confusing. What I really meant was, you can get
into trouble, when you append two mails to one mailbox *at the same
time*. But this is very implausible. Normal operations like delete
and add mails are harmless (in my
When I was first messing around with Mutt I had similar
troubles when trying to use a regular old xterm. It
seems like I found that setting the environment variable
TERM to color_xterm instead of just xterm made it work.
Calling xterm with the -tn color_xterm flag has a similar
effect, I think.
* John J Kearney [EMAIL PROTECTED] [31-10-2001 19:01]:
| please can sombody tell me how to enable colors in mutt
|
| i have a color xterm and vim has colors in it
|
| what must i do for mutt ot work here also
Configure them in your .muttrc ;)
See the 'color' section in `man muttrc`.
--
Moin,
* John J Kearney [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-10-31 19:02]:
please can sombody tell me how to enable colors in mutt
i have a color xterm and vim has colors in it
what must i do for mutt ot work here also
Do you have color statements in your ~/.muttrc?
Go to www.mutt.org and look for examples
Thorsten Haude wrote:
You do that without excessive sync-mailbox's?
Of course *with*. I often forget that somewhere else on another screen
another mutt is open... ;-)
OK then, I'm game.
Good luck! :-)
-volker
--
http://die-Moells.de/ * http://Stama90.de/ *
The problem is fixed in the CVS, and in 1.3.23.1.
(The latter one is an intermediate development version with new
threading code. Use with care.)
On 2001-10-31 12:11:15 -0500, Ken Weingold wrote:
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 12:11:15 -0500
From: Ken Weingold [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: mutt [EMAIL
On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 11:43:33AM -0500, darren chamberlain wrote:
Eric Van Buggenhaut [EMAIL PROTECTED] said something to this effect on 10/31/2001:
Thanks for answering me !
Oh, sure. I've got nothing better to do (but don't tell my
boss I said that.) ;)
On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at
Hi,
I have set up Unicode support on my console (RedHat 7.0) with the
following in /etc/sysconfig/i18n:
LANG="cs_CZ"
SYSFONT="lat2-16"
SYSFONTACM="iso02+euro"
UNIMAP="iso02"
Everything seems to work well, except for mutt (and mc, but
that's another question). When I set charset to utf-8, it
On Wed, 31 Oct 2001, Daniel Farnsworth Teichert wrote:
When I was first messing around with Mutt I had similar
troubles when trying to use a regular old xterm. It
seems like I found that setting the environment variable
TERM to color_xterm instead of just xterm made it work.
Calling xterm
Ben,
I had the same problem ... prepending classic to the links seems to get
you what you want (somewhere in the archives, since that's where i
learned about it). this works for openers:
http://bb.classic.themes.org/php/docs.phtml?docid=25secid=6.2do=Up
hth (and aloha),
dave
On Wed, Oct 31,
Thorsten --
...and then Thorsten Haude said...
% Hi,
Hello! I know that this has been answered back and forth a bit, but it
looks to me like things might still be a bit unclear...
%
% I want to run two Mutts in parallel.
Not a problem. I, too, do it frequently; one common reason I do is
Dave --
...and then Dave Price said...
%
...
% http://bb.classic.themes.org/php/docs.phtml?docid=25secid=6.2do=Up
Did you really mean to send this to us? :-)
%
% hth (and aloha),
% dave
:-D
--
David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles
(play) [EMAIL
On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 06:36:45PM +0100, Eric Van Buggenhaut (dis)graced my inbox
with:
The fact that you can have a mbox-hook linked to a macro isn't documented here. I
only have:
mbox-hook [!]pattern mailbox
When mutt changes to a mail folder which matches pattern,
* Dave Price [EMAIL PROTECTED] [31-Oct-01 03:44 -0800]:
[...]
pine
mutt
netscape
kmail
should be sorted in this set:
pine
netscape
kmail
mutt
[...]
rev filename | sort | rev
[...]
am i missing something or you could simply
sort -r
Denis --
...and then Denis Perelyubskiy said...
% * Dave Price [EMAIL PROTECTED] [31-Oct-01 03:44 -0800]:
% [...]
%
% should be sorted in this set:
%
% pine
% netscape
% kmail
% mutt
% [...]
%rev filename | sort | rev
% [...]
%
% am i missing something
- Forwarded message from davep -
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 19:17:06 -0700
To: Denis Perelyubskiy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT: not able to set textwidth to 65
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; from [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed,
Oct 31, 2001 at 06:02:23PM -0800
On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 09:16:46PM -0500, David T-G
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But that would put mutt before kmail, which isn't what he wanted :-)
And it would also put irrelevant before mutt, which is why maybe it's
time to take this off-list for anyone who still cares.
-Daniel
--
Daniel E.
On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 11:01:00AM -0500, Peter L. Berghold wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 04:41:50PM +0100,
Cliff Sarginson formed electrons and emmitted this:
[*]Am I missing out on something here ?
[*]What is the X-Echelon header
54 matches
Mail list logo
