* Will Yardley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
you can do the exact same thing with a simple procmail recipe. it
can be argued (and as the gnus manual points out) that this might be
unreliable. i use it anyway since i get loads of dupes. you can save
them to a separate folder rather than deleting
On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 09:07:35AM +, Thomas Hurst wrote:
* Thomas Hurst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Unfortunately, short of shooting anyone who ignores Mail-Followup-To,
I don't think there's a workable solution. About the best way I can
think of is on every list delivery, scan
Curt --
...and then Curt W. Zirzow said...
%
% * David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
%
% ...and then Cliff Sarginson said...
% % On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 07:28:32AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
% %
% % ...and then Curt W. Zirzow said...
% % % * Cliff Sarginson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
% %
Cleber, et al --
...and then Cleber S. Mori said...
%
% On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 11:11:10PM +0100, Nils Holland wrote:
% Hi folks,
Welcome to mutt, Nils! :-)
I was fortunate enough to have elm in place (after all, PINE Is Not Elm)
and to never be subjected to PINE. My transition to mutt was
* Petr Baudis [EMAIL PROTECTED] [07-12-2001 17:25]:
| OBTW, are there any reasons why Vsevolod's patches aren't yet incorporated into
| official mutt?
Err, because mutt = a MUA, perhaps?
--
René Clerc - ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
69 + 69 = dinner for 4.
msg21302/pgp0.pgp
On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 12:54:57PM +0100, Cliff Sarginson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 11:07:22AM +, Mark Sheppard wrote:
On 2001-12-07 (Friday) at 09:46:26 +, Paul Roberts wrote:
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 11:56:33PM +0100, Cliff Sarginson wrote:
Cron will
Thomas --
...and then Thomas Hurst said...
%
% I have a nice lists.rc which will filter most mailing list messages
% automagically if anyone wants it.
Tips and tricks are always appreciated. If you don't post it for the
group, please send me either a copy or a pointer.
I'm not opposed to
On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 04:03:45AM -0500, Brian Clark (dis)graced my inbox with:
Can someone explain to me why this:
macroindex\Cb |/usr/bin/urlview\n
macropager\Cb |/usr/bin/urlview\n
(straight from the mutt docs)
Tells me that ^b isn't bound when I try to use it?
* Rob 'Feztaa' Park ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 08:56:24AM +, Thomas Hurst (dis)graced my
inbox with:
My filters look like:
:0:
* ^X-Mailing-List: \/[^@]+
lists/`echo $MATCH | sed -e 's/[\/]/_/g'`
Sorry, it's early and my brain isn't firing on all
* David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
...and then Thomas Hurst said...
I have a nice lists.rc which will filter most mailing list messages
automagically if anyone wants it.
Tips and tricks are always appreciated. If you don't post it for the
group, please send me either a copy or a
I think it has also been asked, but i couldn't find
it in the archive:
since i upgraded to mutt 1.3 i recognize ? in threading
view like:
message
? Re: message subject
? ? Re: message subject
how can i change that?
--
thx in advance
Stefan Antoni
Sam Dez 8
Setting $hide_missing (which is set by default) will get rid of some of
them. I should have a patch to do a more thorough job in a day or two.
I'll send it to mutt-users as well as mutt-dev once it's stable, because
of popular demand.
-Daniel
On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 07:54:24PM -0500, cruciatuz
Thoomas --
...and then Thomas Hurst said...
%
% * David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
%
% ...and then Thomas Hurst said...
%
% I have a nice lists.rc which will filter most mailing list messages
% automagically if anyone wants it.
%
% Tips and tricks are always appreciated. If you
Hey people.
When I send a digitally signed email to some users using M$ Lookout!, they are
immediately prompted for an encryption scheme and they cannot even open my
email until they set one up. Perhaps it's just our brainless IS department at
work, but it means that I can't use digital sigs at
Nicolas --
...and then Nicolas Rachinsky said...
%
...
Let's just get rid of all of this other cron stuff :-)
% It seems mutt outputs nothing to stderr but everything to stdout :-/
%
% What makes the output a bit less messier is to call:
% env TERM=dumb mutt ...
That's not a bad idea. I
Michael --
...and then Michael P. Soulier said...
%
% Hey people.
Hi!
%
% When I send a digitally signed email to some users using M$ Lookout!, they are
% immediately prompted for an encryption scheme and they cannot even open my
So this isn't the classic case of PGP/MIME problems with
On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 03:16:49PM -0500, David T-G
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nicolas --
...and then Nicolas Rachinsky said...
%
...
Let's just get rid of all of this other cron stuff :-)
% It seems mutt outputs nothing to stderr but everything to stdout :-/
%
% What makes the
On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 10:50:57AM -0500, Michael P. Soulier
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey people.
When I send a digitally signed email to some users using M$ Lookout!, they are
immediately prompted for an encryption scheme and they cannot even open my
email until they set one up. Perhaps
* Rob 'Feztaa' Park ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Dec 08. 2001 16:33]:
Can someone explain to me why this:
macroindex\Cb |/usr/bin/urlview\n
macropager\Cb |/usr/bin/urlview\n
(straight from the mutt docs)
Tells me that ^b isn't bound when I try to use it?
I do
Hi again,
Firstly, thanks to all those who gave helpful hints and links regarding
procmail and the like.
Secondly, I'd like to configure Mutt so that it lists my mail
directories on starting it up. Is this even possible and if so,
how? I haven't been able to find any documentation that would
* Steven Schneider ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Dec 08. 2001 17:28]:
Secondly, I'd like to configure Mutt so that it lists my mail
directories on starting it up. Is this even possible and if so,
how? I haven't been able to find any documentation that would tell
me how it's done.
I believe
On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 05:31:07PM -0500, Brian Clark wrote:
I believe starting mutt with the -y command line option will do
exactly what you want. Works for me.
http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/manual-6.html#ss6.1
Duh! Of course! *smacks himself in the head*
And it's right in the
Nope, still not working. I just get:
No incoming mailboxes defined.
When I type mutt -y. Obviously there's more too it. Back to the
man pages.
Thank tho,
Steve
--
E-Mail: Steven Schneider [EMAIL PROTECTED]
URL: http://www.jetnet.ab.ca/users/schnes
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version:
* Steven Schneider ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Dec 08. 2001 17:43]:
I believe starting mutt with the -y command line option will do
exactly what you want. Works for me.
http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/manual-6.html#ss6.1
Duh! Of course! *smacks himself in the head*
And it's right in
On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 03:43:37PM -0700, Steven Schneider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nope, still not working. I just get:
No incoming mailboxes defined.
When I type mutt -y. Obviously there's more too it. Back to the
man pages.
To let mutt -y work, you need to use the mailboxes command
* Steven Schneider ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Dec 08. 2001 17:54]:
Nope, still not working. I just get:
No incoming mailboxes defined.
When I type mutt -y. Obviously there's more too it. Back to the
man pages.
Set some of your mailboxes up with something like:
mailboxes =inbox =mutt-users
On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 05:02:21PM -0500, Brian Clark (dis)graced my inbox with:
Strange, I just copied those macros word for word into my .muttrc and it
works fine. What version of mutt are you using?
1.3.24i
And I was afraid someone would say that. :-(
I'm using 1.3.23, perhaps this
* Rob 'Feztaa' Park ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Dec 08. 2001 18:40]:
I'm using 1.3.23, perhaps this is a new bug?
Also, I vaguely remember having trouble like this with 1.3.15i, but I
can't remember any specifics or how I worked around it, sorry.
Perhaps you should just try binding it to a key
On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 04:37:57PM -0700, Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote:
On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 05:02:21PM -0500, Brian Clark (dis)graced my inbox with:
Strange, I just copied those macros word for word into my .muttrc and it
works fine. What version of mutt are you using?
1.3.24i
And
On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 12:07:46AM +0100, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
To let mutt -y work, you need to use the mailboxes command in your
muttrc. Look in the manual for its syntax.
Did that, looked up that handy URL too.
If you want to show all your folders, you should add somthing like
push
Hello.
I am using mutt-1.2.5i with support for reading news via NNTP (patch
http://mutt.kiev.ua/download/mutt-1.2.5/patch-1.2.5.vvv.nntp.gz).
The news server is my own box (localhost), which has installed
leafnode to fetch newsgroups from usenet.
After reading some messages in a newsgroup with
Hi,
On Fri, 07 Dec 2001 Steven [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed into the ether:
[-- snip --]
Anyhow, I'm on a couple of mailing lists and am beginning to find that
my inbox is getting quite full. What program is the best to use for
sorting my incoming messages into different folders? I've heard
On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 05:30:20PM -0700, Steven Schneider wrote:
Oh, well I wish that I had dl'd this before I modified my .muttrc.
Right now I have three lines like thus:
mailboxes ...
mailboxes ...
mailboxes ...
How about this? (wrapped, should be all one line in .muttrc)
mailboxes !
On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 12:07:46AM +0100, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
If you want to show all your folders, you should add somthing like
push change-folder? #untested!
to your .muttrc, or call mutt with -e change-folder? (also
untested).
Well that worked rather nicely. Thanks for your
Hello,
A few times, I've been going through old mail in one of my mailboxes and
noticed a mail with no subject. Opening it up reveals an entire email
message, headers and all, in the body. I'm using sendmail, procmail,
biff n and mbox format. Is this mutt-related?
I also get a lot of emails, so
On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 08:12:48PM -0800, Mike Erickson wrote:
A few times, I've been going through old mail in one of my mailboxes and
noticed a mail with no subject. Opening it up reveals an entire email
message, headers and all, in the body. I'm using sendmail, procmail,
biff n and mbox
On Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 09:06:42AM +0100, Cliff Sarginson wrote:
On Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 04:20:03PM +1100, Doug Kearns wrote:
I've just noticed that if you are cycling through the command history
and abort with a ^G, the next time you invoke the line editor you are
placed at the point in
37 matches
Mail list logo
