Hi Christoph!
On Fri, 15 Feb 2002, Christoph Maurer wrote:
> Hi!
> On 2002-02-14 Dr. Sharukh K. R. Pavri. wrote:
> > I am using 1.3.27 with a .muttrc that I got from Roland Rosenfeld's page
> > with, by now, quite a few modifications. I had previously got the sample
> > muttrc file for 1.2.x and
On 18:12 15 Feb 2002, Carlos Laviola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| And have a rule that makes it so that when I press m while in a certain
| folder, the message already has the list (say, [EMAIL PROTECTED]) at
| the To: header for me. Since the method used by Han doesn't seem to
| work, I ask you
On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 03:26:32PM -0600, Knute wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Feb 2002, Carlos Laviola wrote:
>
> > Hi, I'm wanting to do something like this guy did (apparently):
>
> > http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanb/dot-mutt/folderhooks
>
> > And have a rule that makes it so that when I press m while in a c
dan radom muttered:
> * Christopher S. Swingley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Dan,
> >
> > > I'm wondering if mutt has the ability to tag messages based on a date
> > > range. I'm specifically looking to tag all messages received from say
> > > 1.1.2002 to 1.31.2002.
> Hmmm. IAfter reading
Michael Tatge wrote:
> Jeremy Blosser muttered:
> > > Is anyone willing/able to send me a .muttrc which works with GnuPG
> > > and a recent version of mutt?
>
> [huge pgp.rc snipped]
>
> Did this have to be on the list? :-|
for that matter, is anything wrong with contrib/gpg.rc? works fine fo
Jeremy Blosser muttered:
> On Feb 15, Dave Smith [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > Is anyone willing/able to send me a .muttrc which works with GnuPG and a
> > recent version of mutt?
[huge pgp.rc snipped]
Did this have to be on the list? :-|
Michael
--
PGP-Key: http://www-stud.ims.uni-stuttgart
On Fri, 15 Feb 2002, Carlos Laviola wrote:
> Hi, I'm wanting to do something like this guy did (apparently):
> http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanb/dot-mutt/folderhooks
> And have a rule that makes it so that when I press m while in a certain
> folder, the message already has the list (say, [EMAIL PROTEC
Hmmm. IAfter reading the muttrc man page I'm not sure why this isn't working. I'm
doing T~r02/02/2002-02/05/2002 and even T~r02/02-/02/05 which should both work. mutt
1.3.27i.
dan
* Christopher S. Swingley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Dan,
>
> > I'm wondering if mutt has the ability to tag
Dan,
> I'm wondering if mutt has the ability to tag messages based on a date
> range. I'm specifically looking to tag all messages received from say
> 1.1.2002 to 1.31.2002.
Say
T~r01/01/2002-01/31/2002
man muttrc
Chris
--
Christopher S. Swingley phone: 907-474-2689
Comput
Fellow mutt lovers,
I'm wondering if mutt has the ability to tag messages based on a date range. I'm
specifically looking to tag all messages received from say 1.1.2002 to 1.31.2002.
dan
* On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 06:12:00PM -0200,
* Carlos Laviola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, I'm wanting to do something like this guy did (apparently):
>
> http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanb/dot-mutt/folderhooks
Sorry I can't look at the website, because I have no
webaccess at the moment.
> And have
Hi, I'm wanting to do something like this guy did (apparently):
http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanb/dot-mutt/folderhooks
And have a rule that makes it so that when I press m while in a certain
folder, the message already has the list (say, [EMAIL PROTECTED]) at
the To: header for me. Since the method us
I'm a bit confused about how to use maildir_trash.
If maildir_trash is off, then when I quit mutt, if I answer "no" to
purging the messages, then it will lose all the "Deleted" flags.
If maildir_trash is on, then that works. However, then it doesn't seem
to be possible to purge deleted messages
> Perhaps this is where the problem lies. I haven't done anything for ncurses to
> handle multibyte input (which is what I understand dead-keys to be). If
> ncurses sees that as 3 characters, it'll think that's how long it displays via
> a prompt. So the repainting would be farther to the right
On Feb 15, Dave Smith [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> Is anyone willing/able to send me a .muttrc which works with GnuPG and a
> recent version of mutt?
# Name: forward_decrypt
# Type: boolean
# Default: yes
# Controls the handling of encrypted messages when forwarding a message. When
# set, the o
On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 03:10:35PM +, Simon White wrote:
> You probably all use save-hooks and all that, but on my setup:
>
> I hit s, then backspace to get rid of the default, and as I hit backspace the
> string gets 'corrupted', i.e. what I see on screen is a mix of what I typed
> and what
You probably all use save-hooks and all that, but on my setup:
I hit s, then backspace to get rid of the default, and as I hit backspace the
string gets 'corrupted', i.e. what I see on screen is a mix of what I typed
and what I had before. If I hit backspace loads of times to be sure the buffer
i
* Dave Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02/02/15 10:39]:
> And my gpg.rc is as follows:
> set pgp_encrypt_only_command="pgpewrap gpg --no-secmem-warning -v --batch --output
>- --encrypt --textmode --armor --always-trust -- -r %r -- %f"
Short version: mutt wants a dynamic ncurses lib, but
all I could find was a static one.
I cannot run mutt on Solaris 8. It configures, makes
and installs fine, but when I try to run it, I get:
---
ld.so.1: mutt: fatal: libncurses.so.5: open
Hi!
On 2002-02-14 Dr. Sharukh K. R. Pavri. wrote:
> I am using 1.3.27 with a .muttrc that I got from Roland Rosenfeld's page
> with, by now, quite a few modifications. I had previously got the sample
> muttrc file for 1.2.x and now I am using the sample file for 1.3.x.
>
> I used my 1.3.27 for a
Hi !!
I am using 1.3.27 with a .muttrc that I got from Roland Rosenfeld's page
with, by now, quite a few modifications. I had previously got the sample
muttrc file for 1.2.x and now I am using the sample file for 1.3.x.
I used my 1.3.27 for a few days w/ the old muttrc (for 1.2.5) till I was
sa
Nick Wilson's last message had 1.3.27i and was GnuPG signed.
Nick?
Simon.
On 15-Feb-02 at 09:05, Dave Smith's transmission stated :
>
> Is anyone willing/able to send me a .muttrc which works with GnuPG and a
> recent version of mutt?
--
|-Simon White
|-Internet Services Manager
|-MTDS S.A.
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 05:13:06PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Since it's a bit complex and I don't really know what I'm talking about, I'm
> giving you a link which does.
Sorry, previous mail should have gone to list, not to you directly.
I've already looked at the link you gave, and it s
23 matches
Mail list logo