»Sven Guckes« sagte am 2002-03-21 um 00:45:34 +0100 :
who said that the compressed folders patch
will work when using Maildir format? ;-)
Nobody, that's why I'd like to force mbox_type=mbox when saving to a
.bz2 file.
append-hook? is this a new one?
Yes. Introduced by CFP.
Alexander
Flavien ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
As the subject says, I recently switched from Netscape to mutt,
a couple of weeks ago. I wanted to do it for a long time, for
several reasons, but you know how lazy one can be when it comes
to changing ones habits... :o)
Same for me. I have used Netscape
* Rob Reid [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-21 19:10:40 -0500]:
At 5:18 PM EST on March 21 Mike Schiraldi sent off:
I don't know. It would be nice to press the key bound to filter and type,
like,
perl -pe 's/.*?//g'
to remove all HTML tags from a message.
It's practically a necessity
* Cameron Simpson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-22 12:24:10 +1100]:
Someone has already mentioned his startup file being:
source shell-cmd |
Wouldn't:
macro foo :source shell-cmd|
be general enough to go most algorithmic things without bloating
mutt? The shell hcan hand of
* Flavien [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-22 01:10:52 +0100]:
*) I filter my fetchmailed-mails through procmail and send the
mails to the appropriate folders (especially mailing lists). Mutt
does not show N in front of the dirs. I read on this list
that's because mutt compares the last-access-time
Pankaj Jangid ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
set from = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
is not working
It should (since you are using 1.3.27). I guess you forgot to set
$envelope_from?
# Configure From:
set realname=Michael Tatge
set from=[EMAIL PROTECTED]
set use_from# create
Rocco, et al --
...and then Rocco Rutte said...
%
% Hi,
Hello!
%
% On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 07:25:50:AM -0500 David T-G wrote:
% ...and then Rocco Rutte said...
% %
% % define my-command-1 'mutt-command-1mutt-command-2enter'
...
% (pager, index, compose, ...) to set the scope of
Cameron, et al --
...and then Cameron Simpson said...
%
% On 11:44 21 Mar 2002, Steve Talley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
% | David T-G wrote:
% | ...and then Steve Talley said...
...
% | orignal, why shouldn't it be able to do the same with an arbitrary
% | shell script?
% |
% | It can --
Quoting Nicolas Rachinsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Mar 22, 2002 06:20]:
* Cameron Simpson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-22 12:24:10 +1100]:
Someone has already mentioned his startup file being:
source shell-cmd |
Wouldn't:
macro foo :source shell-cmd|
be general enough to
Quoting Mike Schiraldi [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Mar 21, 2002 17:17]:
#! /usr/bin/perl -W
while() { print; s/\r//g; chomp; last unless $_; }
while() { y/A-Za-z/N-ZA-Mn-za-m/; print; }
while () {
(1 .. /^$/) ? s/\r\n//g : y/A-Za-z/N-ZA-Mn-za-m/;
print;
}
:)
(darren)
--
All
* Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-21 23:13:28 +0100]:
* Jeremy Blosser [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-21 16:49]:
[SNIP scripting in mutt would be nice]
[SNIP Sven swears in public]
Sven [slang, anyone?]
I seem to remember that someone does/did maintain a patch that made mutt
On Fri, Mar 22, 2002 at 01:10:52AM +0100, Flavien wrote:
*) Aliases : Do I really have to press ^T and then select each
recipient one at a time when I send an email ? I would like
to select multiple persons.
By default, ^T initiate an external address query while alias searching
is initiated
On Fri, 22 Mar 2002, Dave Pearson wrote:
* Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-21 23:13:28 +0100]:
* Jeremy Blosser [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-21 16:49]:
[SNIP scripting in mutt would be nice]
[SNIP Sven swears in public]
Sven [slang, anyone?]
I seem to remember that
On Fri, 22 Mar 2002, Thomas E. Dickey wrote:
I seem to remember that someone does/did maintain a patch that made mutt
programmable via slang.
possibly - but I've only seen it mentioned as a possibility that could
be developed rather than an accomplished fact.
speaking of which (since I
On Fri, 22 Mar 2002, Dave Pearson wrote:
* Thomas E. Dickey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-22 10:28:35 -0500]:
On Fri, 22 Mar 2002, Dave Pearson wrote:
I seem to remember that someone does/did maintain a patch that made mutt
programmable via slang.
possibly - but I've only seen it
* On 2002.03.21, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Jerry Van Brimmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I am using sendmail, but I have no clue as to where sendmail's log file is.
Do you know?
Sendmail doesn't keep an independent log file. All its logs are routed
through the syslog service, so the only
At 8:42 PM EST on March 21 Gary Johnson sent off:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 07:58:16PM -0500, Rob Reid wrote:
I've tried w3m and stripmime does just as well. In fact, I don't want any
fancy interpretation of HTML mail by default - it slows things down and can
be dangerous if the HTML
At 6:10 AM EST on March 22 Nicolas Rachinsky sent off:
* Rob Reid [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-21 19:10:40 -0500]:
macro index H |/home/reid/bin/stripmime.pl /var/spool/mail/reid
What happens if some mail is delivered to your inbox while you are
executing this macro? I think your mailbox
What's the equivalent of send-hook when using the NNTP patch? Is there a
followup-hook?
I'd like to add a header for only news postings.
--
Drew
Drew --
...and then Drew Raines said...
%
% What's the equivalent of send-hook when using the NNTP patch? Is there a
% followup-hook?
I don't think that there is any such beast.
%
% I'd like to add a header for only news postings.
This came up just recently. I think Sven Guckes, at
+ David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
An approach that I recall as successful was to set up a send-hook that
only triggered when there is no to: field and set the header in there,
turning it off (or changing it) otherwise if to: can match anything.
I believe the suggestion was something to the
21 matches
Mail list logo
