Re: /var/spool/mail/.... is not a mailbox

On Mon 15 Apr 2002 11:45:06 NZST +1200, skidley wrote: When I started mutt after a new install I get /var/spool/mail/myusername is not a mailbox. I've never seen such a thing. So I ran fetchmail and it created /var/spool/mail/user and downloaded my pop messages and still when I run mutt I

Re: Re: Outlook pst import: What file format should I use?: Formail problem

Snip out any two consecutive messages from the file and attach them to a reply to the list. I'm sure someone can come up with a quick hack that will [re?]build ^From_ lines for you. Yes, that hack is very simple: man formail man procmail Splitting up a single file which contains

Is pgp_strict_enc working

Hi! I'm having problems with pgp_strict_enc. I want mutt to not encode message to quoted-printable before pgp sign, so I set pgp_strict_enc to no in my .muttrc, but mutt still encode it before sign. What's wrong? Me or mutt? (Of course! Mutt can't be wrong, I know! :-) Thank Patrik.

Re: /var/spool/mail/.... is not a mailbox

* Volker Kuhlmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] [04-15-02 05:45]: On Mon 15 Apr 2002 11:45:06 NZST +1200, skidley wrote: When I started mutt after a new install I get /var/spool/mail/myusername is not a mailbox. I've never seen such a thing. So I ran fetchmail and it created /var/spool/mail/user and

Re: Re: Outlook pst import: What file format should I use?: Formail problem

Volker -- ...and then Volker Kuhlmann said... % % Snip out any two consecutive messages from the file and attach them to a % reply to the list. I'm sure someone can come up with a quick hack that % will [re?]build ^From_ lines for you. % % Yes, that hack is very simple: % % man formail %

Re: PGP signature verification

Rocco, et al -- ...and then Rocco Rutte said... % % Hi, Hello! % % * Thorsten Haude [04/14/02 21:41:00 CEST] wrote: % * Rocco Rutte [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02-04-14 15:13]: % Hmm, checked them and both verify. What does your % $pgp_verify_command look like? % gpg --no-verbose --quiet

Re: PGP signature verification

Thorsten, et al -- ...and then Thorsten Haude said... % % Hi, Hello! % % * Rocco Rutte [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02-04-14 22:46]: % * Thorsten Haude [04/14/02 21:41:00 CEST] wrote: % * Rocco Rutte [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02-04-14 15:13]: % Hmm, checked them and both verify. What does your %

Re: PGP signature verification

Hi, * David T-G [04/15/02 14:06:08 CEST] wrote: ...and then Rocco Rutte said... % * Thorsten Haude [04/14/02 21:41:00 CEST] wrote: % gpg --no-verbose --quiet --batch -o - --verify %s %f % % Except '--quiet' the same here. I don't have --quiet and have --output but am otherwise the

Re: Is pgp_strict_enc working

Hi, * Patrik Modesto [04/15/02 13:46:31 CEST] wrote: I'm having problems with pgp_strict_enc. I want mutt to not encode message to quoted-printable before pgp sign, so I set pgp_strict_enc to no in my .muttrc, but mutt still encode it before sign. What's wrong? Me or mutt? (Of course! Mutt

Re: S/MIME

That doesn't sound as if you were a friend of these. Since I saw a few using S/MIME in this list, what might have been their reason? Is S/MIME better established with non-free software? We had a discussion in February about this. Check out Jeremy's excellent posts:

Mutt newbie and iSpell.

Hello, I am new to the list, to Mutt and to Linux. I have been studying the manual, as well as .muttrc files and am close to the point where I feel I actually can begin to use Mutt on a daily basis ;-) However, I do have a problem. I am trying to implement the following macros, but when I

Re: S/MIME

Hi, * Mike Schiraldi [04/15/02 15:55:22 CEST] wrote: [ interesting points ] Good points, thanks for mentioning. But in my opinion current problems/difficulties with PGP only affect people currently using it. So the concept of a web of trust and the resulting problems only motivate people

fork() ?

Hello guys! Please cc-me in answering, I am not subscribed! I am wondering why mutt has to be locked while G-taking pop mails. I think I still could work/send new mails while mutt does this work. I also think that it would be senseful, if I get 500 messages, I could start to answer the first

Re: fork() ?

Nico Schottelius wrote: I am wondering why mutt has to be locked while G-taking pop mails. I think I still could work/send new mails while mutt does this work. I also think that it would be senseful, if I get 500 messages, I could start to answer the first while recieving the last 400. So

Re: Mutt newbie and iSpell.

Hi, * Brian Durant [04/15/02 17:04:53 CEST] wrote: I am new to the list, to Mutt and to Linux. Welcome. ;-) [...] but when I invoke them in Mutt, I get a rapidly blinking cursor and what appears to be a freeze of all Mutt functions: macro compose i :set ispell=newsbody-ispell\n

Re: fork() ?

begin Nico Schottelius quotation: I am wondering why mutt has to be locked while G-taking pop mails. I think I still could work/send new mails while mutt does this work. I also think that it would be senseful, if I get 500 messages, I could start to answer the first while recieving the

Re: /var/spool/mail/.... is not a mailbox

Hi, * Volker Kuhlmann [04/15/02 08:28:44 CEST] wrote: However, when you make fetchmail deliver directly to procmail, fetchmail does not generate a From line at all, and neither does procmail - big barf results. In that case, use fetchmail - formail | procmail. ,[ ~/.procmailrc ]- | | #

Re: Is pgp_strict_enc working

On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 03:40:03PM +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote: Hi, * Patrik Modesto [04/15/02 13:46:31 CEST] wrote: I'm having problems with pgp_strict_enc. I want mutt to not encode message to quoted-printable before pgp sign, so I set pgp_strict_enc to no in my .muttrc, but mutt still

Re: S/MIME

Hi, * Mike Schiraldi [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02-04-15 15:55]: That doesn't sound as if you were a friend of these. Since I saw a few using S/MIME in this list, what might have been their reason? Is S/MIME better established with non-free software? We had a discussion in February about this. Check

Re: PGP signature verification

Hi, * Shawn McMahon [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02-04-15 02:15]: Can you quote the headers from one you can't verify? I want to see what path it's taking to get to you, perhaps there's a broken MTA involved. Two mails from David, I cannot verify the first, I can verify the second. I rot13'ed the leading

Re: PGP signature verification

Hi, * Thorsten Haude [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02-04-15 20:19]: I cannot verify the first And I cannot verify this one. Thorsten -- Das Briefgeheimnis sowie das Post- und Fernmeldegeheimnis sind unverletzlich. - Grundgesetz, Artikel 10, Abs. 1 msg27201/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP

Re: PGP signature verification

Thorsten Haude wrote: * Thorsten Haude [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02-04-15 20:19]: I cannot verify the first And I cannot verify this one. perhaps it's time (past time???) to take this discussion off list? -- Will Yardley input: william @ hq . newdream . net .

Re: PGP signature verification

Hello Rocco, On Monday, April 15, 2002 at 1:15:41 AM +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hey, that's one of mine and guess what... It verifies okay here. Yes, okay here too now I've corrected effect of my broken deliver. And It should be also verified by anybody else without my

Re: PGP signature verification

begin Thorsten Haude quotation: Received: from pop.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.142] by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.8.0) for yooden@localhost (single-drop); Sun, 14 Apr 2002 17:00:25 +0200 (CEST) That's a really old fetchmail, with a lot of known bugs, including

Re: PGP signature verification

begin Will Yardley quotation: And I cannot verify this one. perhaps it's time (past time???) to take this discussion off list? Is this list no longer for solving Mutt-related problems? Or is it just that you think no one else will possibly ever have this problem, and only the people

Re: PGP signature verification

Hi, * Shawn McMahon [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02-04-15 22:01]: begin Thorsten Haude quotation: Received: from pop.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.142] by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.8.0) for yooden@localhost (single-drop); Sun, 14 Apr 2002 17:00:25 +0200 (CEST) That's a really old

Re: Problems (bugs?) I found with mutt

Michal 'hramrach' Suchanek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered: I found these problems for which I know *no* 100% workaround: - I'm unable to browse Maildirs reliably. They can contain both messages and subfolders but when I enter a maildir the message index is displayed automatically This is

tmp modified. Update encoding?

I recently changed configs - I'm now using fetchmail/procmail/mutt, and when I compose a message in mutt, I get this message when I try to send it: ~/.mutt/tmp/mutt-merrill-1234-0 [#1] modified. Update encoding? ([y]/n): Am I doing something wrong, or have a forgotten something in the config

Re: PGP signature verification

Hi, * Alain Bench [04/15/02 21:31:06 CEST] wrote: On Monday, April 15, 2002 at 1:15:41 AM +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote: So a message would have to be encoded correctly before handing it over to an SMTP delivery process and should be deliverable without any modifications. BTW you seem

Re: Is pgp_strict_enc working

Hi, * Patrik Modesto [04/15/02 20:28:12 CEST] wrote: On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 03:40:03PM +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote: * Patrik Modesto [04/15/02 13:46:31 CEST] wrote: I'm having problems with pgp_strict_enc. I want mutt to not encode message to quoted-printable before pgp sign, so I set

IMAP to Exchange

Is it possible to read Mailinglist of public folders on a Exchange Server with Mutt I manged to configure my mutt to read my mails from the exchange server, but unfortunatly i cannot Browse lower than one level into the public folders. I am running: Debian Linux woddy kernel 2.4.7 with

Re: Problems (bugs?) I found with mutt

Michael Tatge wrote: Michal 'hramrach' Suchanek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered: I found these problems for which I know *no* 100% workaround: - I'm unable to browse Maildirs reliably. They can contain both messages and subfolders but when I enter a maildir the message index is