Michael Elkins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
The development branch now has a reply-hook.
Neat. :)
Michael
--
...Unix, MS-DOS, and Windows NT (also known as the Good, the Bad, and
the Ugly).
(By Matt Welsh)
PGP-Key: http://www-stud.ims.uni-stuttgart.de/~tatgeml/public.key
On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 10:02:53PM -0500, Michael Herman wrote:
6. Is there a way using a message-hook or send-hook to know when an
e-mail is new vs. being a reply or forward? I'd like to only sign
e-mails that I am creating and not replies or forwards.
You don't need a hook to do
On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 08:57:58PM -0700, David Ellement wrote:
On 020904, at 17:57:25, Jonathan Perkin wrote
set allow_8bit, unset use_8bitmime:
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to base64 by gateg.kw.bbc.co.uk
£ ends up coming out as ?
set allow_8bit, set use_8bitmime:
Anyone have any experience using t-prot? I saw it in the Debian
archives, and it looks like an interesting filter for TOFU and unwanted
footers, etc.
Kevin
--
Kevin Coyner
mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GnuPG key: 1024D/8CE11941
msg30706/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
* Kevin Coyner [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020905 12:32]:
Anyone have any experience using t-prot? I saw it in the Debian
archives, and it looks like an interesting filter for TOFU and unwanted
footers, etc.
I use it, I like it, but the version I'm using has two flaws.
- messages forwarded from
Dear all,
I am subscribed to several mailing lists which I sort to different
folders by procmail. So, when I changed to a folder I exactly know
which mailing list's emails I am reading.
For this reason, I would like to have the following feature:
- I am subscribed to a mailing list
and
- I
Howdy all,
I have a question. I am using mutt to read email on an imap server.
This is being done through a ssh tunnel. My question is as follows:
whenever I try to sign anything with my gpg key I get the following error
Can't open PGP subprocess!: No such file or directory (errno = 2)
Why
* Lukas Ruf [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020905 16:00]:
Does anyone know any smart solution to this request? I would
appreciate any hints...
Look in the mutt manual, section 6.3.83
(Hint: use %F instead of %L)
-Johan
--
Johan Almqvist
http://www.almqvist.net/johan/qmail/
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-09-05 16:00:37 +0200:
I would like to have the following feature:
- I am subscribed to a mailing list
and
- I would like to see the sender of the email as it is the case for
emails that do not belong to a mailing lists.
see index_format, s/%L/%F/
--
begin
At 17:57 +0100 04 Sep 2002, Jonathan Perkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Basically, I want mail sent with foreign chars such as £ å é etc
to *not* be sent as QP or base64. Now, with
% /usr/sbin/sendmail -t
From: me
To: you
Subject: blah
£ñ÷åòôùïéõ±²³´
.
Here, not only are you missing the
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 09:39:54AM -0500, Aaron Schrab wrote:
Mutt is behaving fine. My guess is that you have sendmail's
EightBitMode option set to pass, which tells it to just pass
unlabeled 8bit data through, even though this violates the
standards.
But when mutt sends 8bit data, it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bo Peng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK. I found the messages and I am not glad about those so-called
rules.
These so-called rules are called netiquette. Heard of it?
I THINK it is better to put the reply BEFORE quoted text and this
has nothing to
Jussi Ekholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But please, remember to use correct signature delimiter (-- ,
that is dash-dash-space)! O:-)
ITYM 'that is dash-dash-space, dammit'.
Charles
--
---
Charles Cazabon
On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 06:17:34PM -0500, Bo Peng wrote:
OK. I found the messages and I am not glad about those so-called rules.
I THINK it is better to put the reply BEFORE quoted text
A: Top posters
Q: What's the most annoying thing about email these days?
--
Jonathan Perkin - BBC
* Bo Peng [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-04 23:17]:
OK. I found the messages and I am not glad about those so-called rules.
I THINK it is better to put the reply BEFORE quoted text and ..
[unedited fullquote]
thankyou. that's certainly enough.
Sven
--
echo black_list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Michael Herman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-04 23:02]:
2. When I receive an e-mail from someone at work that is a reply to
an earlier e-mail and I view it in the pager, where the other
senders MUA inserted \t (tab) as the quote/attribution character,
Mutt replaces the \t with a .
At 16:00 +0100 05 Sep 2002, Jonathan Perkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Incidentally, how do you set Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit? All
my mails are either QP or base64.
set allow_8bit
will cause mutt to do that, except in some cases related to
crytpographically signed messages. Whether or
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-09-04 18:17:34 -0500:
OK. I found the messages and I am not glad about those so-called rules.
Yes. Ah, so-called good manners. Such a useless junk!
I THINK it is better to put the reply BEFORE quoted text and this has
nothing to do with M$. It is natural (to
Hi. I have a small annoying problem. I use mutt mostly on a xterm-like
terminal but this also happens on the console. Everytime I go trough a
signed message the screen goes nuts and I have to make a ctrl-L to put it
back. This is maybe a poor termcap definition caused by the message
returned
I post an email, asking a simple question. What happened?
I suppose that not only Will know the answer. However, I was defined as
a M$ follower, a corrupted newbie. I was then directed to a manner
class.
After I expressed my personal preference. I get more emails, not limited
to what you
Bo Peng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I post an email, asking a simple question. What happened?
You ignored thirty years of netiquette and suggested it was okay to do so.
Are there good manners?
Most of us still have them. You don't.
Charles
--
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 01:00:49PM -0500, Bo Peng wrote:
Are there good manners?
yes, there are. i am going to make an assumption here and
assume that english is not your first language (no slight
intended.) let's say you and two other people are talking,
one speaks your native language and
Hello,
On 05 Sep 2002, Johan Almqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I use it, I like it, but the version I'm using has two flaws.
Which version do you use?
- messages forwarded from say, Outlook, will be hidden
- messages from Outlook users who try to respond to quoted material
At 9:39 PM EDT on September 4 Bo Peng sent off:
There is nothing wrong with either order. Nobody is 'corrupted' by
anything.
Wrong. People are.
Software as good as mutt should be neutral between these
preferences, i.e. provides support for both styles.
No, good != neutral. Good
This will be my last post about this topic. I am not gonna waste more
time on this trivial issue, even if it is important to many of you.
I do not know exactly how many people reply before quoted message but
over 90% of my daily emails are in this style and I can see this kind of
emails all
On Thu Sep 05, 2002 at 03:30:28AM +0200, Corren Vorwerk wrote:
i also had the prob with my mutt.
without putting my password into my muttrc - i think its much saver on
most computers but mine at home - i found something strange out.
when i backspaced on the password-question and tham typed
Is there a way to forward e-mails in-line but any attachments are
attached to the forward?
For example, If I receive an e-mail with a spreadsheet and I would
like to forward it, the text of the original e-mail would be in-line
with my e-mail but the spreadsheet would be an attachment.
Thanks.
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 05:00:19PM -0500, Bo Peng wrote:
In this discussion, many replies are polite and informative but others
are cynical and rude, even they are written in 'good style'. I can sit
down and argue with you about compared to web, ftp, mp3, rm, how much
bandwidth is used for
On Thu, Sep 5, 2002, Bo Peng wrote:
I do not know exactly how many people reply before quoted message but
over 90% of my daily emails are in this style and I can see this kind of
emails all over the Internet. Maybe they are all bad-mannered people,
maybe they are all corrupted by M$, I feel
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 05:00:19PM -0500, Bo Peng wrote:
This will be my last post about this topic. I am not gonna waste more
time on this trivial issue, even if it is important to many of you.
Hi Bo,
One time, about, oh, twenty or so years ago I felt the same way you currently
do about top
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 07:49:40PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As for the manner on this group, you are correct. This group can
be a little rougher in its treatment of newbies than most others.
I'm not sure why they think they have to be but its just the select few
* Pedro Alves [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-05 17:02]:
I have a small annoying problem. I use mutt mostly on a
xterm-like terminal but this also happens on the console.
Everytime I go trough a signed message the screen goes nuts
and I have to make a ctrl-L to put it back. This is maybe a
poor
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 06:01:48PM -0600, Peter T. Abplanalp wrote:
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 07:49:40PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As for the manner on this group, you are correct. This group can
be a little rougher in its treatment of newbies than most others.
I'm not sure why they
* Michael Herman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-05 22:13]:
Is there a way to forward e-mails in-line but
any attachments are attached to the forward?
For example, If I receive an e-mail with a
spreadsheet and I would like to forward it, the text
of the original e-mail would be in-line with my
* Michael Herman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-04 23:02]:
When I receive an e-mail from someone at work that is a reply to
an earlier e-mail and I view it in the pager, where the other
senders MUA inserted \t (tab) as the quote/attribution character,
Mutt replaces the \t with a . I would like
Regarding mutt 1.4i: Is the %s which the query_command variable expects
expanded by mutt in the same manner as %s in mailcap entries? I.e.,
Keep the %-expandos away from shell quoting... Mutt does this for you
(as described in the mailcap sections)? The explanation of
query_command gives an
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 05:57:24PM -0400, Michael Herman wrote:
Is there a way to forward e-mails in-line but any attachments are
attached to the forward?
For example, If I receive an e-mail with a spreadsheet and I would
like to forward it, the text of the original e-mail would be
I didn't see this in the FAQ or in a search of the archives, so
just point me to the right spot if this is an FAQ that I missed
somehow.
When sending some PDFs, mutt is incorrectly guessing that
'quoted printable' is sufficient -- the PDF in question doesn't
contain 8-bit characters in the
On 020905, at 18:41:18, Gary Johnson wrote
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 05:57:24PM -0400, Michael Herman wrote:
Is there a way to forward e-mails in-line but any attachments are
attached to the forward?
For example, If I receive an e-mail with a spreadsheet and I would
like to forward
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 05:00:19PM -0500, Bo Peng wrote:
This will be my last post about this topic. I am not gonna waste more
time on this trivial issue, even if it is important to many of you.
I do not know exactly how many people reply before quoted message but
over 90% of my daily
40 matches
Mail list logo
