Sven,
On Sun, 13 Oct 2002, Sven Guckes wrote:
yup. in addition, here's a hook for this:
folder-hook . delete-pattern~=
using your proposal let to an error message Unknown command.
Playing around let me to slight glimpse of improvement:
folder-hook (fain|mutt|vim|linuxdebian)
Sven,
On Sun, 13 Oct 2002, Sven Guckes wrote:
folder-hook . delete-pattern~=
right at the moment, I defined
folder-hook . push 'D~=\n'
folder-hook . limit!~=cr
It it works, I prefer this approach as well!
Thanks,
--
Lukas Ruf
http://www.lpr.ch
* Bernard Massot [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-10-12 15:49]:
Is it possible to change the function executed first when entering a box ?
It seems that mutt calls next-new whereas I'd like it to
call next-unread. I've tried to use exec first-entry
next-unread but when I enter a box with no unread
Sven,
On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, Sven Guckes wrote:
it all depends on how you treat your doggie.
did you try to teach him new tricks, perhaps?
fed him any weird patches lately? or
maybe you should take it for walkies?
Well, if I fed any cookies I knew because I do not rely on dselect for
Folks,
a few seconds ago, I wanted to re-subscribe under a different name on
http://www.mutt.org/mail-lists.html
A thing I did not like there was the way how you offer the different
mailing lists: You offer them as radio-buttons instead of checkboxes.
Why? Using mozilla 1.0, I was not
* dan radom ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
in the process of playing with imap i noticed something strange. when opening any
mailbox, the current highlighted message appears to have the same text, foreground
and background colors. in other words it appears as a solid red bar, where it should
* Bernard Massot [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-10-12 15:49]:
Is it possible to change the function executed first when entering a box ?
It seems that mutt calls next-new whereas I'd like it to
call next-unread. I've tried to use exec first-entry
next-unread but when I enter a box with no unread
mutt default's behavior is :
- if the box has no messages matching ~N or ~O, go on last message in
the bottom of the index (right for me)
- if there are some messages matching ~N, go on the 1st message matching
~N (right for me)
- if there are some messages matching ~O, go on the 1st message
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 12:08:18AM +0200, Hanspeter Roth wrote:
Hello,
is there a host-hook in mutt 1.4 or later?
I would like to set the `hostname' variable depending on the
hostname.
hostname = `hostname`
Is it what you want ?
--
Bernard Massot
msg31756/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP
* Lukas Ruf:
quite often I receive emails several times because
people do not know how to handle mailing list replies.
Is there a possibility in mutt 1.4 of which I can make use such
that duplicates get automagically marked as deleted whenever I
enter a new folder. I assume, I would need
Dear all,
quite often I receive emails several times because people do not know
how to handle mailing list replies.
Is there a possibility in mutt 1.4 of which I can make use such that
duplicates get automagically marked as deleted whenever I enter a new
folder. I assume, I would need to bind
Hello,
is there a host-hook in mutt 1.4 or later?
I would like to set the `hostname' variable depending on the
hostname.
-Hanspeter
Lukas Ruf wrote:
quite often I receive emails several times because people do not know
how to handle mailing list replies.
Is there a possibility in mutt 1.4 of which I can make use such that
duplicates get automagically marked as deleted whenever I enter a new
folder. I assume, I would
Hi,
* Hanspeter Roth [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02-10-13 00:08]:
I would like to set the `hostname' variable depending on the
hostname.
For your own hostname, `hostname` should do, for the receiver's
hostname, a sendhook should work.
Thorsten
--
If you don't claim your humanity, you will become a
* Hanspeter Roth [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-10-13 00:08 +0200]:
is there a host-hook in mutt 1.4 or later?
I would like to set the `hostname' variable depending on the
hostname.
What about set hostname=`hostname`?
Nicolas
* René Clerc [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-10-12 16:46]:
* Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] [11-10-2002 20:25]:
[all context]
* Ren Clerc [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-10-11 16:01]:
^^
This grieves me, Sven...
sorry, man. this iconv stuff
just doesn't work on solaris.
i downloaded the latest
Dear all,
I would like to configure mutt 1.4 for outgoing emails such that every
outgoing email is saved in an folder according to one of the following
two methods:
a) some particular folders are configured according to well-known ,-)
email-addresses using the fcc-hook '~C pattern'
On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 11:54:00PM +, MindFuq wrote:
What do you non-abook users use? I don't care if it's textual or
graphical.
Check out lbdb (Little Brother Data Base) -- google for 'lbdb'. It has
a bunch of modules (including something called 'm_palm', and lots of
others) that can
Hi
Is it possible to change the function executed first when entering a
box ?
It seems that mutt calls next-new whereas I'd like it to call
next-unread. I've tried to use exec first-entry next-unread but when
I enter a box with no unread message, it lets the cursor on the 1st
message, and I
* Piotr Kasztelowicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-10-12 23:04]:
On Sun, 13 Oct 2002, Sven Guckes wrote:
and installed it, recompiled mutt --with-iconv=$HOME -
it can be. I have like you experiences with
mutt, iconv, Solaris 7, gcc 3.2 and gnumake
so that makes two of us.
well, i suppose i might
* Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] [11-10-2002 20:25]:
[all context]
* Ren Clerc [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-10-11 16:01]:
^^
This grieves me, Sven...
--
René Clerc - ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
No woman, no cry.
-Bob Marley
msg31768/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, 13 Oct 2002 the mental interface of
Lukas Ruf told:
Dear all,
I would like to configure mutt 1.4 for outgoing emails such that every
outgoing email is saved in an folder according to one of the following
two methods:
a) some particular folders are configured according to
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 12:54:15AM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
* Bernard Massot [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-10-12 15:49]:
Is it possible to change the function executed first when entering a box ?
It seems that mutt calls next-new whereas I'd like it to
call next-unread. I've tried to use exec
On Oct 13 at 02:20, Bernard Massot spoke:
hostname = `hostname`
Is it what you want ?
No. I want something like this:
if [ `hostname` == host1 ]; then
set hostname=host2
fi
It should also affect the domain in the envelope when using bounce.
-Hanspeter
* Hanspeter Roth [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-10-13 18:04 +0200]:
On Oct 13 at 02:20, Bernard Massot spoke:
hostname = `hostname`
Is it what you want ?
No. I want something like this:
if [ `hostname` == host1 ]; then
set hostname=host2
fi
It should also affect the domain in
Luka --
...and then Lukas Ruf said...
%
...
% b) all the emails I do not have specifically configured fcc-hooks for,
%I would like to store in the folder where I actually read the
%emails in. This is most useful when replying.
%
% For b) I would like to make use of the folder-hook.
* On 2002.10.12, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Sven Dogbert Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
so - is anyone using mutt 1.4 with iconv on solaris successfully?
mind you - i am not root, so all my stuff resides in my $HOME.
I'm using 1.5.1 on Solaris, and before that I used 1.3.x on Solaris,
On Oct 13 at 18:49, Nicolas Rachinsky spoke:
Write a shellscript, which outputs the info you want (depending on
whatever you want) and source it with 'source pathtoscript|'.
Ok. Thank you.
-Hanspeter
Elimar,
On Sun, 13 Oct 2002, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
This means you want set record=+inbox ?
Maybe fcc-hook . inbox , but this is a contradiction!
I do not have a folder named inbox. It does not really solve my
problem. Thanks, anyway.
--
Lukas Ruf
http://www.lpr.ch
David,
On Sun, 13 Oct 2002, David T-G wrote:
Why bother to be folder-specific? Back to TFM and you'll find the
abbreviation for the current folder can help:
fcc-save-hook . ^
Pardon my non-understanding, but searching the text version of the
manual for the current folder as well as
On Sun, 13 Oct 2002 the mental interface of
Lukas Ruf told:
Elimar,
On Sun, 13 Oct 2002, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
This means you want set record=+inbox ?
Maybe fcc-hook . inbox , but this is a contradiction!
I do not have a folder named inbox. It does not really solve my
Elimar,
thanks.
On Sun, 13 Oct 2002, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
inbox is the folder where your incoming mails are saved! If you
are using procmail it is your DEFAULT=$MAILDIR/YourInbox. If not try
/var/spool/mail/YourUserName!
Well, I know the name inbox from my pine-times -- some two or
* Lukas Ruf [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-10-13 14:00]:
On Sun, 13 Oct 2002, Sven Guckes wrote:
folder-hook . delete-pattern~=
using your proposal let to an error message Unknown command.
Playing around let me to slight glimpse of improvement:
folder-hook (fain|mutt|vim|linuxdebian) 'push
* dan radom [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-10-12 23:38]:
* dan radom ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
in the process of playing with imap i noticed something
strange. when opening any mailbox, the current
highlighted message appears to have the same text,
foreground and background colors. in other
* Bernard Massot [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-10-12 23:41]:
mutt default's behavior is :
- if the box has no messages matching ~N or ~O,
go on last message in the bottom of the index (right for me)
- if there are some messages matching ~N,
go on the 1st message matching ~N (right for me)
-
* Sven Guckes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
so the green on default thing made mutt place
the red bar at the bottom of the screen? huh??
Sven [green things? it's *gotta* be aliens...]
yup. when vt100 worked fine i figured it was a runaway color line in muttrc. i
commented then out one by
I've been looking around for a painless way to modify the From header based on
which account I am using.
I am sure this has been done as I can't be the only person with way too many
email accounts. I am looking for a patch or keybinding that will allow me to
scroll through a list of email
37 matches
Mail list logo
