Messages tagged as Old (O)

2007-07-01 Thread Kumar Appaiah
Dear Mutt Users, My Mutt is 1.5.13. I have no issues with it, except that all of my incoming mail (to my mboxes) are flagged as O instead of N. And when I read them, they are marked as read and it's all right. But why are they marked with an O instead of an N? How do I find out? Thanks! Kumar

Re: Messages tagged as Old (O)

2007-07-01 Thread Kumar Appaiah
On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 12:56:11PM +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote: Dear Mutt Users, My Mutt is 1.5.13. I have no issues with it, except that all of my incoming mail (to my mboxes) are flagged as O instead of N. And when I read them, they are marked as read and it's all right. But why are they

Re: Messages tagged as Old (O)

2007-07-01 Thread Kumar Appaiah
On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 01:12:29PM +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote: Sorry, I realized that I had nomark_old set. Hence the problem. But that wasn't the issue. All my incoming mails (delivered by procmail to my mboxes) are marked O. What else could the reason be? Thanks. Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah,

Re: Messages tagged as Old (O)

2007-07-01 Thread Patrick Shanahan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * Kumar Appaiah [EMAIL PROTECTED] [07-01-07 03:59]: On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 01:12:29PM +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote: Sorry, I realized that I had nomark_old set. Hence the problem. But that wasn't the issue. All my incoming mails (delivered by

Re: Messages tagged as Old (O)

2007-07-01 Thread Alessio 'mOLOk' Bolognino
On Sun 2007-07-01 08:22 , Patrick Shanahan wrote: * Kumar Appaiah [EMAIL PROTECTED] [07-01-07 03:59]: On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 01:12:29PM +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote: Sorry, I realized that I had nomark_old set. Hence the problem. But that wasn't the issue. All my incoming mails

sidebar patch for mutt 1.5.16?

2007-07-01 Thread Raffi Khatchadourian
Does anyone have a working sidebar patch for mutt 1.15.16? The latest posted on the sidebar website is for 1.15.15.