On 2007.10.10 17:46:58 +, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wednesday, October 10 at 03:29 PM, quoth Rem P Roberti:
> > Is it possible to use curly braces to nest conditions? For example,
> > there are two addresses that can be used for the FreeBSD
On 2007-10-10, Benjamin A'Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm trying to set up hooks to modify my From address. I have two
> conditions.
>
> a) If I'm in a specific folder (in this case =lists) or its subfolders,
> use Address B.
> b) If I'm sending to a specific domain, use Address C.
>
> Ot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, October 10 at 03:29 PM, quoth Rem P Roberti:
> Is it possible to use curly braces to nest conditions? For example,
> there are two addresses that can be used for the FreeBSD mailing
> list to which I subscribe, and I would like to inco
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, October 10 at 11:00 PM, quoth Benjamin A'Lee:
>I can do a):
>
> folder-hook . my_hdr From: address_a
> folder-hook =lists my_hdr From: address_b
>
>Or, I can do b):
>
> send-hook . my_hdr From:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Rem P Roberti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [10-10-07 18:30]:
> Is it possible to use curly braces to nest conditions?
yes
> For example, there are two addresses that can be used for the FreeBSD
> mailing list to which I subscribe, and I would like to inco
Is it possible to use curly braces to nest conditions? For
example, there are two addresses that can be used for the FreeBSD
mailing list to which I subscribe, and I would like to incorporate them both
into the same
recipe.
Rem
I'm trying to set up hooks to modify my From address. I have two
conditions.
a) If I'm in a specific folder (in this case =lists) or its subfolders,
use Address B.
b) If I'm sending to a specific domain, use Address C.
Otherwise, use address A.
I can do a):
folder-hook . my_h
* Nicolas Rachinsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-10 09:28 +0200]:
* Breen Mullins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-09 19:05 -0700]:
MAILDIR by itself isn't special in procmail. You usually set it so that
you can use it in your delivery recipes:
It is special. Quoting procmailrc(5):
Indeed, as
On 10/10/07 21:41, Rado S wrote:
> =- Joseph wrote on Wed 10.Oct'07 at 13:15:09 -0600 -=
>
> > Does anybody have a link or knows where to find a Quick Reference
> > type help page for mutt similar like O'Reilly has; especially the search
> > patterns and other items not listed under help menu ?
=- Joseph wrote on Wed 10.Oct'07 at 13:15:09 -0600 -=
> Does anybody have a link or knows where to find a Quick Reference
> type help page for mutt similar like O'Reilly has; especially the search
> patterns and other items not listed under help menu ?
I've seen links on the wiki
> Old mutt us
Does anybody have a link or knows where to find a Quick Reference
type help page for mutt similar like O'Reilly has; especially the search
patterns and other items not listed under help menu ?
I'm sure it is not possible to squeeze it all under one page, so several
pages would be OK, and in colo
* Kyle Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-09 21:23 -0500]:
On Tuesday, October 9 at 07:05 PM, quoth Breen Mullins:
MAILDIR by itself isn't special in procmail.
On the contrary, MAILDIR *IS* special. Reread the procmail
documentation. Specifically:
Right, of course. Thanks. (I knew that,
On 10/8/07, Sander Smeenk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm happy you CC'd the list. The 'bad part' is CC'ing the Original
> Poster. As he/she is likely to be subscribed to the list too.
>
> List replies are good. Direct replies are bad.
However, list+direct replies allow you to flag a list message
also sprach Kyle Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.10.10.1305 +0100]:
> That doesn't make much sense to me. If I have a read message and I say
> "toggle-new", why would mutt assume that I really wanted to
> "toggle-old"? Perhaps what's needed is a different function?
Sure. I am not talking abou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, October 10 at 12:54 PM, quoth martin f krafft:
>also sprach Kyle Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.10.10.1245 +0100]:
>> current next
>>
>> !O & !N N <--- This is the crucial difference, right?
>
also sprach Kyle Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.10.10.1245 +0100]:
> current next
>
> !O & !N N <--- This is the crucial difference, right?
Almost, but yes. My argument is that this behaviour should depend on
$mark_old. If that's set, the result should
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, October 10 at 11:59 AM, quoth martin f krafft:
>also sprach Michael Tatge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.10.10.1140 +0100]:
>> I'm confused. Do you want to remove the Old (and New) flag or set N for
>> a messages that was previously Old?
>
>Id
also sprach Michael Tatge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.10.10.1140 +0100]:
> I'm confused. Do you want to remove the Old (and New) flag or set N for
> a messages that was previously Old?
Ideally, I want to press N to do any of the following, depending on
context:
current next
~~~
* On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 martin f krafft ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
> also sprach Michael Tatge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.10.10.0720 +0100]:
> > Don't use . N removes the N flag if it's there
> > but doesn't add N if the message is not N.
> > If your goal is "O"ld messages anyway why have toggle-n
also sprach Michael Tatge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.10.10.0720 +0100]:
> Don't use . N removes the N flag if it's there
> but doesn't add N if the message is not N.
> If your goal is "O"ld messages anyway why have toggle-new at all?
Can you think of another way to toggle, which I've been using for
* Breen Mullins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-09 19:05 -0700]:
> MAILDIR by itself isn't special in procmail. You usually set it so that
> you can use it in your delivery recipes:
It is special. Quoting procmailrc(5):
MAILDIR Current directory while procmail is executing (that means
On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 02:31:48PM -0700, Gary Johnson wrote:
> > > On 2007-10-09, Nicolas KOWALSKI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Is it possible to not display the pgp or smime signature at all in
> > > > the pager ?
> This is what I actually use when reading the mutt lists.
>
> folder-hook
22 matches
Mail list logo