Hello,
Is it possible to reply to a specific message (specified by its
Message-ID, say) from the command line?
I was told on the #mutt IRC channel that it is possible to write such
a script using mutt -e ..., and that someone on this mailing list
might know how.
[Unrelated question: What
On 24 Aug 2008 15:25 -0400, by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Shreevatsa R):
Is it possible to reply to a specific message (specified by its
Message-ID, say) from the command line?
I was told on the #mutt IRC channel that it is possible to write such
a script using mutt -e ..., and that someone on this
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 4:06 PM, Michael Kjorling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 24 Aug 2008 15:25 -0400, by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Shreevatsa R):
Is it possible to reply to a specific message (specified by its
Message-ID, say) from the command line?
I was told on the #mutt IRC channel that it is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday, August 24 at 05:17 PM, quoth Shreevatsa R:
function reply() {
MID=$1; shift;
mutt -e push 'l ~h $MIDEnterg' $@
}
Strictly speaking, you may want to use the function names rather than
the keys themselves, even though it makes the
On 24Aug2008 16:41, Kyle Wheeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| On Sunday, August 24 at 05:17 PM, quoth Shreevatsa R:
| function reply() {
| MID=$1; shift;
| mutt -e push 'l ~h $MIDEnterg' $@
| }
|
| Strictly speaking, you may want to use the function names rather than
| the keys themselves,
* Kyle Wheeler on Sunday, August 24, 2008 at 16:41:53 -0500
On Sunday, August 24 at 05:17 PM, quoth Shreevatsa R:
function reply() {
MID=$1; shift;
mutt -e push 'l ~h $MIDEnterg' $@
}
Strictly speaking, you may want to use the function names rather than
the keys themselves, even
I used to use mutt on a linux machine, but have used it on cygwini for
some time. Checking my muttrc I found I used to use a perl script
called addlist to add subscribe lines for mailing lists to a file that
could be sourced in muttrc. I can not recall where I got it from. Can
anyone help me? Who
