tls_socket_read - definitely a Mutt bug.

2011-03-09 Thread Mason Loring Bliss
I can consistently achieve this: tls_socket_read (A TLS packet with unexpected length was received.) ...if I have a non-existent mailbox in my mailboxes list. Does anyone know if this is a known bug, offhand? Or shall I create a login to the bug tracking system and file it? -- Mason

Re: tls_socket_read - definitely a Mutt bug.

2011-03-09 Thread Mason Loring Bliss
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 04:18:15PM -0500, Mason Loring Bliss wrote: Does anyone know if this is a known bug, offhand? Or shall I create a login to the bug tracking system and file it? And foolishly, I forgot to mention what I got this with. To wit: 1.5.21 (2010-09-15) from Fedora 14's Mutt

Re: tls_socket_read - definitely a Mutt bug.

2011-03-09 Thread Aaron Toponce
On 3/9/2011 2:23 PM, Mason Loring Bliss wrote: On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 04:18:15PM -0500, Mason Loring Bliss wrote: Does anyone know if this is a known bug, offhand? Or shall I create a login to the bug tracking system and file it? And foolishly, I forgot to mention what I got this with. To

how to set a default subject via send-hook?

2011-03-09 Thread Will Fiveash
I'd like to have the Subject: of an e-mail I'm creating set to a default string based on the recipient. Is that possible via send-hook or some other method and if so can someone provide an example? Here's what I'm thinking: send-hook 'expen...@foo.com' 'my_hdr Subject: Receipts for Expense

Re: how to set a default subject via send-hook?

2011-03-09 Thread Monte Stevens
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 05:42:17PM -0600, Will Fiveash wrote: I'd like to have the Subject: of an e-mail I'm creating set to a default string based on the recipient. Is that possible via send-hook or some other method and if so can someone provide an example? Here's what I'm thinking: