Re: mairix search

2011-05-03 Thread Jostein Berntsen
On 03.05.11,00:26, Tim Gray wrote: On Apr 29, 2011 at 01:56 PM +0200, Sebastian Tramp wrote: Is searching / indexing with mairix state of the art or is there a better solution available? I am quite happy with that, just wanted to ask ;-). I found that mairix was a lot better for me than

Re: mairix search

2011-05-03 Thread Sebastian Tramp
On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 12:26:45AM -0400, Tim Gray wrote: On Apr 29, 2011 at 01:56 PM +0200, Sebastian Tramp wrote: Is searching / indexing with mairix state of the art or is there a better solution available? I am quite happy with that, just wanted to ask ;-). I found that mairix was a

Re: mairix search

2011-05-03 Thread Sebastian Tramp
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 06:00:04PM -0400, Ed Blackman wrote: On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 02:08:33PM -0700, Omen Wild wrote: Quoting Ed Blackman e...@edgewood.to on Fri, Apr 29 17:03: In my case, mairixquery is a Perl script that prompts me for the mairix search string, gives me yes or no prompts

Re: offlineimap much slower than gmail-imap

2011-05-03 Thread Scott Barker
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 12:03:46AM +0200, Jose M Vidal wrote: I was happily using mutt with gmail-imap. Then I decided to switch to offlineimap+msmtp, so I could still use mutt offline, have a backup of all my e-mails and, hopefully, increase mutt speed by working locally. But, after having

Re: mairix search

2011-05-03 Thread Tim Gray
On May 03, 2011 at 08:39 AM +0200, Jostein Berntsen wrote: I use mairix, but it seems like mu is being quite actively developed: Yes, mu is quite actively developed. I liked it a fair amount. I just have a feeling that notmuch has a brighter future.

Re: offlineimap much slower than gmail-imap

2011-05-03 Thread Jose M Vidal
Hi everybody. Thank you very much for your help. The situation now is: 1- As my /home folder is ecrypt I added to my .muttrc your suggestion (folder-hook 'archive' 'push toggle-write; unset maildir_header_cache_verify') Apparently, after a first refresh, the update of files looks inmediate, but

Re: mairix search

2011-05-03 Thread Tim Gray
On May 03, 2011 at 08:47 AM +0200, Sebastian Tramp wrote: Sounds interesting. do you think, notmuch is faster than mairix (not that I have a problem with mairix speed, just for our information) It's been a while since I've used mairix. I forget exactly how long it took to index things

Re: offlineimap much slower than gmail-imap

2011-05-03 Thread Jose M Vidal
What does the following command give you (assuming your disk is /dev/sda):    hdparm -tT /dev/sda jm@jm-ThinkPad-X200s:~$ sudo hdparm -tT /dev/sda6 /dev/sda6: Timing cached reads: 2738 MB in 2.00 seconds = 1370.52 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads: 116 MB in 3.02 seconds = 38.45

quoted-printable not displaying correctly

2011-05-03 Thread Grant Edwards
I've noticed that pretty much all of the e-mail I get from MS Windows users is not being displayed correctly. The problem messages are multipart/alternative. There are two parts: The first is Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The second is

Re: quoted-printable not displaying correctly

2011-05-03 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2011-05-03, Grant Edwards grant.b.edwa...@gmail.com wrote: I've noticed that pretty much all of the e-mail I get from MS Windows users is not being displayed correctly. The problem messages are multipart/alternative. There are two parts: The first is Content-Type: text/plain;