[ Will Yardley Wrote On Tue 27.Nov'12 at 7:40:45 GMT ]
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 09:57:33AM +, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
Does anyone have or know of a perl or python script, or even a shell
script, that removes the multipart/(mixed|alternative| ... ) parts of
incoming mail and leaves
* On 25 Nov 2012, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
In the end the new version of the message is generated by formail, so
it's subject to formail's limitations, if it has any. (I don't know of
any.) It would be possible to update the python script to handle the
rewrite with python core
=- Jeremy Kitchen wrote on Mon 26.Nov'12 at 10:48:24 -0800 -=
don't you think this discussion has been exhausted to death now?
It only started out as a request to wrap lines in my email bodies.
I do find that part kind of funny.
You were asked to wrap, came up with a reasonable excuse
[ Rado S Wrote On Tue 27.Nov'12 at 10:20:12 GMT ]
=- Jeremy Kitchen wrote on Mon 26.Nov'12 at 10:48:24 -0800 -=
don't you think this discussion has been exhausted to death now?
It only started out as a request to wrap lines in my email bodies.
I do find that part kind of funny.
[ David Champion Wrote On Tue 27.Nov'12 at 10:18:32 GMT ]
* On 25 Nov 2012, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
In the end the new version of the message is generated by formail, so
it's subject to formail's limitations, if it has any. (I don't know of
any.) It would be possible to update
On 2012-11-26, Jamie Paul Griffin ja...@kode5.net wrote:
Does anyone have or know of a perl or python script, or even a shell
script, that removes the multipart/(mixed|alternative| ... ) parts of
incoming mail and leaves or converts the message into plain text?
Here's the Python program I use
On 2012-11-27, Jamie Paul Griffin ja...@kode5.net wrote:
[ Rado S Wrote On Tue 27.Nov'12 at 10:20:12 GMT ]
You were asked to wrap, came up with a reasonable excuse why you
weren't, got a solution in reply and said ok, thanks, I'll do that.
Three weeks later...
Occasionally the secretly
On 2012-11-27, Jamie Paul Griffin ja...@kode5.net wrote:
I'm sorry but you've lost me again :-) - both of you
There are two kinds of people:
1) Those who oppose ambiguity
2) Those who are wrong
Now those who oppose ambiguity want quotes to be trimmed, with a
direct reply underneath so
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 08:01:04AM +, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
Hi Will, yes i've looked at demime and even used it in the past but it's
primarily for mailing lists and it strips out too much for my needs.
Thanks for the suggestion though.
If memory serves, it's configurable, so you
* On 27 Nov 2012, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
David thank you very much indeed, it works beautifully. I really
appreciate you giving up your time to create it and modify it. I'm sure
it will be prove useful to plenty of people.
Great, thanks for the update. I'm glad it's helped.
Time now to
[ Tony's unattended mail Wrote On Tue 27.Nov'12 at 16:45:58 GMT ]
On 2012-11-27, Jamie Paul Griffin ja...@kode5.net wrote:
I'm sorry but you've lost me again :-) - both of you
There are two kinds of people:
1) Those who oppose ambiguity
2) Those who are wrong
Now those who
11 matches
Mail list logo
