Re: Tagging duplicates

2016-11-09 Thread Cameron Simpson
On 09Nov2016 04:57, Jon LaBadie wrote: On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 12:15:50AM -0800, David Champion wrote: It should just work. It only works with a threaded view IIRC. Jon: you're sure there _are_ duplicate messages in your folder? Cheers, Cameron Simpson

Re: Tagging duplicates -- [SOLVED]

2016-11-09 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 12:13:00AM -0500, Jon LaBadie wrote: > A year or more back someone posted a technique for > tagging duplicate mails in a mailbox. It used T~=. > The tagged mails could then be deleted. > > I'm now using mutt on another system and the T~= > sequence does not work and I

Re: Tagging duplicates

2016-11-09 Thread Marcelo Laia
On 08 Nov 2016, Jon LaBadie wrote: > A year or more back someone posted a technique for > tagging duplicate mails in a mailbox. It used T~=. > The tagged mails could then be deleted. > > I'm now using mutt on another system and the T~= > sequence does not work and I can't see what I > might

Re: best practices answering multiple mails (at once?)

2016-11-09 Thread Erik Christiansen
On 08.11.16 19:47, Simon Ruderich wrote: > On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 10:28:46AM +0100, nfb wrote: > > Oh thank you all guys for your answers. Let me practice what i > > learnt then... this kinda seems the appropriate use case too :) > > In this case it was "problematic" for me, because I didn't

Re: Tagging duplicates

2016-11-09 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 12:15:50AM -0800, David Champion wrote: > * On 08 Nov 2016, Jon LaBadie wrote: > > A year or more back someone posted a technique for > > tagging duplicate mails in a mailbox. It used T~=. > > The tagged mails could then be deleted. > > > > I'm now using mutt on another

Re: Tagging duplicates

2016-11-09 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 08:10:31AM +0100, Francesco Ariis wrote: > On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 12:13:00AM -0500, Jon LaBadie wrote: > > A year or more back someone posted a technique for > > tagging duplicate mails in a mailbox. It used T~=. > > The tagged mails could then be deleted. > > `~=` works

Re: Tagging duplicates

2016-11-09 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 10:24:09PM -0800, Will Yardley wrote: > On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 12:13:00AM -0500, Jon LaBadie wrote: > > > > I'm now using mutt on another system and the T~= sequence does not > > work and I can't see what I might have added to my .muttrc to make it > > work. > > Do the

Re: Tagging duplicates

2016-11-09 Thread Francesco Ariis
On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 12:13:00AM -0500, Jon LaBadie wrote: > A year or more back someone posted a technique for > tagging duplicate mails in a mailbox. It used T~=. > The tagged mails could then be deleted. `~=` works here, but I am on 1.5.23.

Re: Tagging duplicates

2016-11-09 Thread David Champion
* On 08 Nov 2016, Jon LaBadie wrote: > A year or more back someone posted a technique for > tagging duplicate mails in a mailbox. It used T~=. > The tagged mails could then be deleted. > > I'm now using mutt on another system and the T~= > sequence does not work and I can't see what I > might

Re: Tagging duplicates

2016-11-09 Thread Will Yardley
On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 12:13:00AM -0500, Jon LaBadie wrote: > > I'm now using mutt on another system and the T~= sequence does not > work and I can't see what I might have added to my .muttrc to make it > work. Do the messages show up as duplicates according to Mutt in the index? Do they have