Cameron Simpson wrote: > On 19Dec2018 23:39, Victor Sudakov <v...@sibptus.ru> wrote: > >Christian Ebert wrote: > >>* Victor Sudakov on Wednesday, December 19, 2018 at 19:44:27 +0700: > >>>Cameron Simpson wrote: > >>>>On 19Dec2018 13:05, Victor Sudakov <v...@sibptus.ru> wrote: > >>>>>Does this very message conform to the flowed format? [...] > >>>> > >>>>I think so. It renders just fine in my mutt (flows nicely) and when I > >>>>look at the headers and text directly it all seems good. And if I send > >>>>both your message and one of mine off to my gmail account they both > >>>>render badly. > >>> > >>>But your message doesn't flow in my mutt when I resize the terminal > >>>window! > >> > >>It would/will if you do a sync-mailbox - bound to $ by default > >>iirc. > > > >I did not know that. I expected it to reflow on SIGWINCH or something. > > > >It really does reflow on "$". Thank you. > > It might be on redisplay: the display_filter gets rerun with a specific > window. Just try switch to another message and back.
Yes, it works this way too. And it looks nicer than sending messages with no line-breaks at all within each paragraph as John Hawkinson suggests. Because if I make my xterm very wide, f=f messages don't get too wide (flowing stops at about 70 columns). While in John's messages, each paragraph becomes a very long line which is difficult to read. -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN 2:5005/49@fidonet http://vas.tomsk.ru/
