Re: Compiling a newer version than the latest .deb package

2019-06-02 Thread Ken Moffat
On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 12:24:33PM +1200, Frank Watt wrote: > > I had to leave out gpgme, but I had a problem with > > configure: error: no curses library found > Hi Frank, I assume you probably won't get this mail (gmail dislikes my mails from this address), but just in case ... > There are

Re: Compiling a newer version than the latest .deb package

2019-06-02 Thread Frank Watt
On 3/06/19 2:00 AM, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: [...] Lastly, the latest mutt releases have started to bump up system requirements:  * If your gpgme library is too old and you don't use gpgme,    you can just leave '--enable-gpgme' out.  * If your OpenSSL version is too old, you could try

Re: Compiling a newer version than the latest .deb package

2019-06-02 Thread Kevin J. McCarthy
On Sun, Jun 02, 2019 at 09:51:25PM +1200, Frank Watt wrote: On 2/06/19 9:07 PM, Jens John wrote:> On Sun, 2 Jun 2019, at 05:36, Frank Watt wrote: [1] https://git.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/tree/trunk/PKGBUILD?h=packages/mutt#n21 That's just the sort of information I was seeking.

Re: Compiling a newer version than the latest .deb package

2019-06-02 Thread Frank Watt
On 2/06/19 9:07 PM, Jens John wrote:> On Sun, 2 Jun 2019, at 05:36, Frank Watt wrote: >> Am I to assume that I would have had sendmail in my environment at the >> time the deb was installed? So I'd need to remove it so that I can >> compile mutt with built-in SMTP. What else would I need

Re: Compiling a newer version than the latest .deb package

2019-06-02 Thread Jens John
On Sun, 2 Jun 2019, at 05:36, Frank Watt wrote: > Am I to assume that I would have had sendmail in my environment at the > time the deb was installed? So I'd need to remove it so that I can > compile mutt with built-in SMTP. What else would I need to bear in > mind? > > I'm a bit apprehensive