On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 09:23:34PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
Sorry, but this is an archaic way of looking at the problem. People
have been doing this for decades now, has become the norm, common
practice, and really it is therefore WE who are being inconsiderate by
not accepting de facto
On Sun, Apr 05, 2020 at 12:09:55AM +0100, Sam Kuper wrote:
> I'll assume you mean that the email has multiple parts or attachments,
> one (or more) of which is an HTML file and one (or more) of which is an
> image file, and that the HTML file has an "img" element with a "src"
> attribute whose
On Sat, Apr 04, 2020 at 02:29:02PM -0400, Fred Smith wrote:
> When God invented email, He intended that it be plain text! :)
> As such, rich-text/html/images in email is the spawn of the devil. :) :)
Ignoring the aspect about sky fairies inventing anything, this is
still largely untrue. Sure, in
