On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 05:46:53PM +0100, Chris Green wrote:
> Does mutt still use the (IMHO silly) maildir hierarchy where mail
> 'folders' are simply represented by another '.' and name in the
> maildir directory name?
I'm not sure why you think Mutt is doing this... I have my maildir
folders
On 23Sep2020 14:58, Kurt Hackenberg wrote:
>On 2020-09-23 04:07, Chris Green wrote:
>
>>I think I might try that second idea, I can run mb2md (as you say)
>>2354 times and get the layout I want. Then I can try mutt on it and
>>see if it's practical.
>
>
>Does mb2md convert message attributes?
On 2020-09-23 04:07, Chris Green wrote:
I think I might try that second idea, I can run mb2md (as you say)
2354 times and get the layout I want. Then I can try mutt on it and
see if it's practical.
Does mb2md convert message attributes? (Message has been read, message
has been replied to,
On 2020-09-23 03:22, Francesco Ariis wrote:
Il 23 settembre 2020 alle 13:52 Kevin Shell ha scritto:
In mail/news discussion,
some reply messages have no In-Reply-To/References headers,
what cause reply messages don't have In-Reply-To/References headers?
A possible explanation: the sender
On 23Sep2020 09:11, Chris Green wrote:
>> I don't browse from within mutt (but see Kevin's reply) but I do have
>> a
>> directory hierarchy. Admittedly it is shallow and does not have Maildirs
>> inside Maildirs, but my own folders are like this:
>>
>> ~/mail/foldername # top level
* Francesco Ariis on Wednesday, September 23, 2020 at 10:30:09 +0200:
Il 23 settembre 2020 alle 15:55 Kevin Shell ha scritto:
On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 09:22:02AM +0200, Francesco Ariis wrote:
By default mutt checks In-Reply-To/References to group threads; *also*,
messages with the same Subject
On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 10:30:09AM +0200, Francesco Ariis wrote:
> Il 23 settembre 2020 alle 15:55 Kevin Shell ha scritto:
> > On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 09:22:02AM +0200, Francesco Ariis wrote:
> > > By default mutt checks In-Reply-To/References to group threads; *also*,
> > > messages with the same
Il 23 settembre 2020 alle 15:55 Kevin Shell ha scritto:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 09:22:02AM +0200, Francesco Ariis wrote:
> > By default mutt checks In-Reply-To/References to group threads; *also*,
> > messages with the same Subject are grouped together in «pseudo threads»
> > (reference [1]).
>
On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 08:20:11AM +1000, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> On 22Sep2020 17:46, Chris Green wrote:
> >Does mutt still use the (IMHO silly) maildir hierarchy where mail
> >'folders' are simply represented by another '.' and name in the
> >maildir directory name?
>
> Are you talking about
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 10:40:09PM -0400, Kurt Hackenberg wrote:
> On 2020-09-22 13:30, Chris Green wrote:
>
> > > Does mutt still use the (IMHO silly) maildir hierarchy where mail
> > > 'folders' are simply represented by another '.' and name in the
> > > maildir directory name?
> > >
> > > Is
On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 09:44:22AM +1000, raf wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 06:30:52PM +0100, Chris Green wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 05:46:53PM +0100, Chris Green wrote:
> > > Does mutt still use the (IMHO silly) maildir hierarchy where mail
> > > 'folders' are simply represented by
On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 09:22:02AM +0200, Francesco Ariis wrote:
> Hello Kevin,
>
> Il 23 settembre 2020 alle 13:52 Kevin Shell ha scritto:
> > In mail/news discussion,
> > some reply messages have no In-Reply-To/References headers,
> > what cause reply messages don't have In-Reply-To/References
Hello Kevin,
Il 23 settembre 2020 alle 13:52 Kevin Shell ha scritto:
> In mail/news discussion,
> some reply messages have no In-Reply-To/References headers,
> what cause reply messages don't have In-Reply-To/References headers?
A possible explanation: the sender clicked «New message» and
13 matches
Mail list logo
