Re: not to set message id in outgoing email

2021-02-16 Thread Cameron Simpson
On 16Feb2021 09:37, Shehu Dikko wrote: >* Cameron Simpson [20210216 09:02:36]: >>On 15Feb2021 21:53, Shehu Dikko wrote: >>>* Peng Yu [20210203 20:23:18]: >>>>I want the first MTA add one, instead of using the one generated by >>>>mutt. >>&

Re: Marking as unread when moving mail to another folder

2021-02-16 Thread Cameron Simpson
On 16Feb2021 11:31, Sam Kuper wrote: >On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 10:57:13AM +0200, Kai Weber wrote: >> I have a save-hook defined to move all mail into a certain folder. >> >> save-hook "~A" +personal/Archive >> >> Very often I want to move the mail into the archive without opening the >> mail

Re: Marking as unread when moving mail to another folder

2021-02-16 Thread Sam Kuper
On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 10:57:13AM +0200, Kai Weber wrote: > I have a save-hook defined to move all mail into a certain folder. > > save-hook "~A" +personal/Archive > > Very often I want to move the mail into the archive without opening the > mail at all but then the mail ends up as unread

Mailman strips subject from DMARC messages (was: Re: Fwd:)

2021-02-16 Thread Sam Kuper
On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 12:49:12PM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 12:24:23PM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: >> On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 02:04:11PM -0400, Remco Rijnders wrote: >>> Unfortunately, the subject of such messages seems to get cleared. I >>> don't think this is

Re: simple formatting possibilities

2021-02-16 Thread Sam Kuper
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 01:06:48PM -0400, Mark H. Wood wrote: > Things like HTML and PDF are designed for finalized documents. PDF, yes. But historically, TimBL very much designed HTML for revisable documents. (Sadly, as was already pointed out earlier in the thread, many people are unwilling

Re: not to set message id in outgoing email

2021-02-16 Thread Shehu Dikko
* Cameron Simpson [20210216 09:02:36]: >On 15Feb2021 21:53, Shehu Dikko wrote: >>* Peng Yu [20210203 20:23:18]: >>>I want the first MTA add one, instead of using the one generated by >>>mutt. >> >>One way to get what you want is to use esmtp: >&