On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 10:16:51AM -0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 10:36:29AM -0500, Ofer Inbar wrote:
>> One feature they all share is that "support_id:" prefix in the fake
>> email address.
>
> The ':' isn't allowed in the address local part, so I believe the mutt
> par
On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 10:16:51AM -0800,
"Kevin J. McCarthy" wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 10:36:29AM -0500, Ofer Inbar wrote:
> >From: "WeTeachSex"
>
> >One feature they all share is that "support_id:" prefix in the fake
> >email address.
>
> The ':' isn't allowed in the address local pa
On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 10:36:29AM -0500, Ofer Inbar wrote:
From: "WeTeachSex"
One feature they all share is that "support_id:" prefix in the fake
email address.
The ':' isn't allowed in the address local part, so I believe the mutt
parser is rejecting the email address. Because of that
I've been getting occasional spam recently that follows a common
pattern in the From: header. Below is the full header section of
one of these emails, as an example:
--
>From MAILER-DAEMON Tue Feb 1 10:20:50 2022
Return-Path: <>