Re: Is linewrap dead?

2022-09-03 Thread raf via Mutt-users
On Sun, Sep 04, 2022 at 01:51:25PM +1000, Cameron Simpson wrote: > Well, this has been quite the read. > > As a plain text person (aren't we all?) I find poor quality mail clients > annoying, as shown by the motivating screenshot of a plain text hard folder > message presenting on a narrow

Re: Having problems with POP3 setup

2022-09-03 Thread raf via Mutt-users
On Sat, Sep 03, 2022 at 05:35:31PM -0500, x...@trimaso.com.mx wrote: > What's the current panorama for POP3 nowadays? Is it still used or is it > dying? I heard Yahoo dropped POP3 support since years ago, except for paid > users... > > Thanks again. I don't think POP will go away entirely. I

Re: Is linewrap dead?

2022-09-03 Thread Cameron Simpson
Well, this has been quite the read. As a plain text person (aren't we all?) I find poor quality mail clients annoying, as shown by the motivating screenshot of a plain text hard folder message presenting on a narrow portrait mode mail reader. There seem to two approaches available:

Re: Having problems with POP3 setup

2022-09-03 Thread xtec
Thanks for all the advice. I did give Getmail a try, and you're right: it has more features. I'd probably try using it for daily use, like Msmtp, if it weren't for 2 issues: ---No STARTTLS support, only SSL: author at the mailing lists seems to not like very much the idea of implementing it.

Re: Re: Is linewrap dead?

2022-09-03 Thread Francesco Ariis
Il 03 settembre 2022 alle 12:33 Jan Eden via Mutt-users ha scritto: > While I find this thread quite entertaining, we should accept that we > are an increasingly small group of people who care not just about plain > text email (and its formatting), but about email in general. > > Over at

Re: Re: Is linewrap dead?

2022-09-03 Thread Jan Eden via Mutt-users
On 2022-09-03 00:46, Derek Martin wrote: > On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 07:45:05PM -0400, John Hawkinson wrote: > > Derek Martin wrote on Wed, 31 Aug 2022 > > at 19:35:15 EDT in <20220831233515.gf13...@bladeshadow.org>: > > > > Evaluating the strength of a SHOULD requires looking at pragmatic > >