Re: Re: Handling multiple From addresses

2022-09-13 Thread Jan Eden via Mutt-users
On 2022-09-13 20:07, Robert wrote: > Hi there, > > On 2022-09-04 17:17, Jan Eden via Mutt-users wrote: > > - Can I define multiple From addresses to select them from a list? > > - Can mutt be configured to switch the default BCC address to a changed > > From address? > > - If there is only a

Re: Handling multiple From addresses

2022-09-13 Thread Robert
Hi there, On 2022-09-04 17:17, Jan Eden via Mutt-users wrote: > - Can I define multiple From addresses to select them from a list? > - Can mutt be configured to switch the default BCC address to a changed > From address? > - If there is only a single PGP private key for each address – is it >

Re: Regard To-Envelope for alternates?

2022-09-13 Thread Will Yardley
On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 04:42:17PM +, Tim Chase wrote: > > While I wish I had a satisfactory answer, this is mostly to chime > in that I too wish that reverse_name would consult the > Envelope-To/Delivered-To. This includes this mutt list, where I > have to manually change my default From:

Re: Regard To-Envelope for alternates?

2022-09-13 Thread Tim Chase
On 2022-09-12 14:24, Bastian wrote: > I am a happy user of Alternative Addresses [1] in mutt, together with > reverse_name and reverse_realname. [snip] > However, when the mail is sent for instance to a maillist or without > setting the headers to/c, then mutt sets the default From address

Loading several intialisation files at startup

2022-09-13 Thread Sébastien Hinderer
Dear all, I would like to have a nice way to deal with several accounts in mutt. I am talking just about the .muttrc file aspect here. My present configuration is that each account has its own muttrc file which sources a common one. I find it a pity to repeat the source main-mutt-config-file

Re: [Mutt] Is linewrap dead? Now: Self hosted SMTP

2022-09-13 Thread Nacho via Mutt-users
> In 2022 I find astonishing how much of Microsoft's antispam seems > to rely on lists (addresses, IP blocks…). Leading to annoying > false positives, with rates well higher than Google's. Those "false positives" are clearly made on purpose to boycott independent mail providers, it doesn't

Re: Re: [Mutt] Is linewrap dead? Now: Self hosted SMTP

2022-09-13 Thread Jan Eden via Mutt-users
On 2022-09-12 21:59, bastian-muttu...@t6l.de wrote: > On 12Sep22 21:07+0200, Mihai Lazarescu wrote: > > Given the cheap VPS, I can mirror the setup on a second VPS from a different > > provider with quick DNS switch in case of issues. > > I just did that approx half a year ago. Before,

Re: [Mutt] Is linewrap dead?

2022-09-13 Thread raf via Mutt-users
On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 09:07:37PM +0200, Mihai Lazarescu wrote: > On Monday, September 12, 2022 at 15:15:55 +, Nacho via Mutt-users wrote: > > > > What you describe is becoming more and more history, which I regret. > > > Let me give you the link of an article that should interest you. >