Let's say person A mails me and cc:'s person B. Now, I want to reply
to all of them, so I do a `g'roup-reply. It seems that mutt's default
behavior is to compose a message to person A and cc:'d to me and
person B. What's the rationale for this?
I would prefer that 'g' only send the message to
i am pretty sure that metoo works for group reply as well. my guess is
that you don't have 'alternates' set correctly or set at all... what is
your 'alternates' line?
that was it! thanks!
w
david
% I can read files of my old saved mail just fine, but I can't edit
% them. Mutt reports that the folders are read-only. I have AFS tokens
% and I'm able to read and write those files at the command-line. I'm
% not sure why Mutt doesn't think it can also.
mutt doesn't do any locking,
I'm running Mutt 1.2.5i (2000-07-28) and I'm having trouble running on
top of AFS.
I set my folder variable to an AFS directory in my .muttrc file.
I can read files of my old saved mail just fine, but I can't edit
them. Mutt reports that the folders are read-only. I have AFS tokens
and I'm
is it possible to have a dynamic my_hdr? i want to add a line to the
header of my outgoing email, but i want the line to be generated
dynamically.
for static, i know it's just:
my_hdr Reply-To: foo.
i want the "foo" to be generated from the output of a perl script, for
instance. (and
IIRC I was able to see my new header, so try setting up your .muttrc with
the simple `` method and see if that puts 'em in.
Nope. That doesn't work either.
You might also try turning on edit_hdrs, since I *know* that I was
able to selectively delete the headers from emails that didn't want
