On Mon, May 08, 2000 at 08:15:51PM +0200, Marius Gedminas mentioned:
On Mon, May 08, 2000 at 12:03:15PM +0100, John P . Looney wrote:
Has anyone noticed that sometimes, when viewing a mail with Lynx, through
mutt, that they fight over the terminal ?
Not with mutt, but lynx used to fight
On Sat, May 06, 2000 at 05:16:13AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] mentioned:
This is related to Mutt because maybe in a near future we see html
emails as the norm, and not the exception, and some kind of html rendering
engine gets implemented into Mutt.
What's your opinion related to
On Thu, Apr 20, 2000 at 09:41:00AM +0100, Telsa Gwynne mentioned:
On Wed, Apr 19, 2000 at 10:29:03AM -0400 or thereabouts, Bakki Kudva wrote:
[eek, can you split your lines with line-breaks? :)]
Just starting with mutt and I am excited! Have spent nearly 3 days buried
in the
On Mon, Apr 17, 2000 at 04:06:29PM +0200, Terje Elde mentioned:
Is there any real reason why we're not supporting this directly? I mean, a lot
of people here at the office start throwing things at me, because I'm signing
messages this way. They're PGP users as well, they just don't use mutt.
On Wed, Dec 15, 1999 at 05:07:57PM +0100, Dominik Vogt mentioned:
What is the easiest way to reply to the sender and all
cc'ed addresses at once with mutt? THere must be a
simpler method than cut-and-paste.
Heh. There is. The 'g' or "group_reply" command..
Kate
--
Microsoft. The best
On Tue, Dec 14, 1999 at 11:37:07AM +, Telsa Gwynne mentioned:
I tried this and can't make it happen. RH Linux 6.1, XFree86 (3.3.5),
October Gnome, mutt-1.0pre3i (with slang) and either gnome-terminals
or xterms. Sorry. However, I can imagine the effects as I once managed
to get both
to
[EMAIL PROTECTED], I want Mutt to set the reply as coming from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Currently it sets all mail to From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've in my .muttrc:
send-hook . my_hdr reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
send-hook . my_hdr From: John P. Looney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
send-hook ilug my_hdr From: [E
Soemtimes, when I type my passphrase, I mistype - it's ~fifty characters
long, so it's not *that* unexpected. Anyway. Mutt never asks me to re-issue
the passphrase if GPG reports back a bad passphrase. Is there anyway bar
quitting out of mutt, or to go into the PGP menu, select "Sign (a)s", and
On Tue, Nov 23, 1999 at 08:04:57PM -0500, Brendan Cully mentioned:
On Tuesday, 23 November 1999 at 12:30, John P . Looney wrote:
Anyone that's using IMAP - change "RECENT" to "UNSEEN" in
imap/imap.c:1208, and "new mail" checking will feel a lot better.
On Tue, Nov 23, 1999 at 08:30:49PM -0500, Brendan Cully mentioned:
I am frankly baffled. Were you low on disk space? Mutt fetches messages
into temp files - it sounds like it might not have been able to write to
them...
Actually, I mentioned this to Brendan yesterday too - you have your
Anyone that's using IMAP - change "RECENT" to "UNSEEN" in
imap/imap.c:1208, and "new mail" checking will feel a lot better.
Thanks to Brendan Cully for pointing me in this direction...
John
--
Microsoft. The best reason in the world to drink beer.
http://www.redbrick.dcu.ie/~valen
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
John P. Looney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Mon, 15 Nov 1999:
I'm using 1.1.1 and 1.0, and both are giving me the same problems.
I had to read your message twice before I noticed the error in the
Subject line. I think I read somewhere some sort of hints for email
I'm using 1.1.1 and 1.0, and both are giving me the same problems.
I'm trying to use mutt to read from an IMAP server. I have in my
~/.muttrc:
mailboxes {gpo}inbox {gpo}Mail/personal {gpo}/Mail/OldMail
{gpo}/Mail/mutt
My home directory is mounted over NFS, but the mutt_dotlock program is
13 matches
Mail list logo
