Re: folder hook: delete old messages [solved]

On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 07:56:00PM -0800, Michael Elkins wrote.. On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 06:52:12PM -0500, Kevin Coyner wrote: For the longest time I successfully used a folder hook like this: folder-hook =mutt-users push 'delete-pattern~r5d!~Fenter' Have you verified

folder hook: delete old messages

, but now this folder hook does not delete anything. Any thoughts on what might be happening? Using Mutt 1.5.13 connecting to an Imap server. Thanks. -- Kevin Coyner GnuPG key: 1024D/8CE11941

folder hook: delete older than 5 days

, but now this folder hook does not delete anything. Any thoughts on what might be happening? Using Mutt 1.5.13 connecting to an Imap server. Thanks. -- Kevin Coyner GnuPG key: 1024D/8CE11941 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

folder_format %N not working after upgrade to 1.5.16

in the file browser display in 1.5.16. Any one see this happen before? Thanks Kevin -- Kevin Coyner GnuPG key: 1024D/8CE11941 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: connecting to imap

imap_peek = yes set imap_servernoise = yes set imap_home_namespace = imaps://mydomain.com set imap_headers = set imap_idle = no Kevin -- Kevin Coyner GnuPG key: 1024D/8CE11941 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

moving through mailboxes with new mail

it Thanks Kevin -- Kevin Coyner GnuPG key: 1024D/8CE11941 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: How to specify multiple alternates

]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Kevin Coyner GnuPG key: 1024D/8CE11941 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: moving through mailboxes with new mail

On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 03:42:06PM -0400, Kevin Coyner wrote.. Under this new imap setup, I've got most things working except for this 'c' functionality. The first time I hit it, it takes me to the first mailbox in my mailboxes list that has new mail. The second time I hit it, it goes

Re: mutt, spamcop, and vi: header weeding

is: SpamCop could not find your spam message in this email: ... Any thoughts on the above macro? Has anyone a similar, working version? Thanks Kevin -- Kevin Coyner GnuPG key: 1024D/8CE11941 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: mutt, spamcop, and vi: header weeding

On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 05:20:14PM -0600, Travis H. wrote.. On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 04:49:46PM -0500, Kevin Coyner wrote: macro index \cx :set autoedit=no fast_reply=yes \ editor=\/bin/true\\ntag-prefixforward-messagesubmit.xx \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]send-message:set autoedit=yes

mixmaster

have mixmaster compiled in, as I've already wasted too much time on this. :-) Kevin -- Kevin Coyner mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG key: 1024D/8CE11941 msg30789/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

t-prot

Anyone have any experience using t-prot? I saw it in the Debian archives, and it looks like an interesting filter for TOFU and unwanted footers, etc. Kevin -- Kevin Coyner mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG key: 1024D/8CE11941 msg30706/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: spamassassin

unignore X-Spam-Status If it's not reported (and you choose to), you may easily report the mail with the keystroke S if you use this: macro index S | spamassassin -r report message to Vipul's Razor Just tryin' to help... Thanks! You've been very helpful to me. Kevin -- Kevin Coyner mailto

Re: spamassassin

blacklist_from $x $SPAMASSASSINFILE done [...] -- Kevin Coyner mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG key: 1024D/8CE11941 msg30339/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

spamassassin

it be looking for audio/x-wav files? Thanks in advance for any tips. Kevin -- Kevin Coyner mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG key: 1024D/8CE11941 msg30313/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Adressbook?

: 17 hours 9 minutes -- Kevin Coyner mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG key: 1024D/8CE11941 msg29012/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Adressbook?

On Fri, Jun 14, 2002 at 11:59:24PM +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote.. So sprach Kevin Coyner am 2002-06-14 um 17:43:27 -0400 : I started using abook yesterday, so I can't really give a solid Thanks, will try it. addresses from within mutt. One thing it doesn't seem to have

Re: navigation questions from a newbie

On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 11:19:34AM -0400, Brett Sanger wrote.. Okay, just started using mutt, (previously used pine, decided to make the switch). I've heard pretty much nothing but good things about mutt, so I'm assuming most of my issues can be resolved, I just don't know how. I

signed email and OE

to get around this OE shortcoming? Obviously I can set up send-hooks with and without the signature, but this presumes I know beforehand what client the recipient is using. Is there another way? Thanks Kevin -- Kevin Coyner mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG key: 1024D/8CE11941 msg28909

Re: signed email and OE

% that MS products are not my first choice in software. However, many of % my friends use these products, in particular Outlook Express. Friends don't let friends use Outlook :-) LOL ! % % Recently I started GPG signing most of my emails, and have found that % the recipients

urlview: console vs xterm

As always, thanks, Kevin -- Kevin Coyner mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG key: 1024D/8CE11941 msg28807/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: GnuPG - verify signatures

On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 07:09:18AM -0500, David T-G wrote.. Kevin, et al -- % % I'm using the new 1.0.7, OK. If you've never used gpg before this then you're probably fine; if you're upgrading, there are some particular caveats. New user. Can't you tell? I thought it would be

GnuPG - verify signatures

I've recently installed mutt and loving it. Now I'm taking a stab at getting my GnuPG key associated with mutt, verifying sigs, etc. I've got it working such that I can send my signature and send encrypted, but for some reason I can't verify the sigs of others. Here's what I have in my

Re: trash patch

On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 12:05:22AM +0200, Cedric Duval wrote.. Kevin Coyner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I thought I'd give the trash patch a try, but being inexperienced with command line patches, I've run into the following error, although I thought I had the right syntax

maildir vs mbox

I don't want to start a religious war, but is there consensus opinion as to whether mbox or Maildir is better? I know mutt supports both automatically, so it's probably a bit of a mute question, but mutt also gives you the option of specifying which format new folders are set up in, so I

trash patch

I thought I'd give the trash patch a try, but being inexperienced with command line patches, I've run into the following error, although I thought I had the right syntax [kosuke@sumida mutt-1.4]$ patch -p1 patch-1.4.trash.txt can't find file to patch at input line 4 Perhaps you used the

delete messages to trash - was 3 quick questions

there is to it. -- Eeyore -- Kevin Coyner mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG key: 1024D/8CE11941

ask-from quadoption was 3 quick questions

On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 08:13:40AM -0400, darren chamberlain wrote: * Ken Weingold [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-06-06 16:40]: Well here's a feature request. I wish there were an option to have mutt prompt you for which return address to use, being able to pick from a menu of addresses set

Re: ask-from quadoption was 3 quick questions

On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 09:37:12AM -0400, darren chamberlain wrote: * Kevin Coyner [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-06-07 09:28]: Many thanks for the patch. I'll give it a try, but have to learn how to apply them first. I've graduated from windoze to linux rpms to now being comfortable

trash function (was 3 quick questions)

On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 07:32:58PM +0200, Thorsten Haude wrote: * darren chamberlain [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02-06-07 14:18]: I have been using this setup for over a year, and it works great: [Macro-based trash function] You should have a look at Cedric's patch. I used something similar to your

urlview

I just installed urlview and gave it a try on a message that I knew to have a few links. Sure enough it listed the links and gave an arrow that allowed me to select one of the links. When I selected, it rewrote the link down at the bottom of the screen. But after that, nothing, regardless of

Re: urlview

for your patience, as I suspect I'm trying it. Kevin You should have something like at least one of those in yours, perhaps also including the REGEXP (I forget whether REGEXP is necessary or if I've simply tweaked the default). HTH HAND :-D -- -- Kevin Coyner mailto: [EMAIL

Re: urlview

David -- again, thanks for the help . On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 03:50:52PM -0500, David T-G wrote.. Kevin - ...and then Kevin Coyner said... % % David --- % % On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 03:11:24PM -0500, David T-G wrote.. % Did you hit return again? Interestingly enough, you

Re: [Re: NuBe: upgrade question]

Wow Wow. I see that I've a lot to learn. I'm really liking Mutt, but in all honesty it's a lot of work to put everything together. Ultimately that flexibility is the beauty of Mutt, but to get started is a steep learning curve, especially if you are relatively new to Linux, and even newer to

recommend good address book

As the newest Mutt user on the block (and definitely still trying to figure things out), one of the things I'm leaving behind with KMail is the KAddressbook. The two integrated pretty well. I'm enjoying using Mutt, although mangling the messages, but am wondering whether there is a good console

Re: [Re: NuBe: upgrade question]

, David T-G wrote: Kevin -- ...and then Kevin Coyner said... % % Wow Wow. I see that I've a lot to learn. We all do. Don't worry; it'll come! % % I'm really liking Mutt, but in all honesty it's a lot

3 quick questions

First, thanks to everyone so far for their help. I'm finding Mutt challenging but fun, and with the help from this group, it's even better. Second, 3 quick questions: 1. Where do D (deleted) msgs go? Is there an equivalent of trash, or am I truly out of the disneyland GUI world now and just