Re: Mutt lies about PGP/GPG signature verification result

2002-03-19 Thread Michal Kochanowicz
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 06:52:50AM -0500, R Signes wrote: Define it. set pgp_good_sign=Good signature I did it. And this solves problem with encrypted signed messages. But it still complains that it could not verify signature in messages which were _encrypted_ony_. -- --= Michal [EMAIL

Re: Mutt lies about PGP/GPG signature verification result

2002-03-19 Thread Michal Kochanowicz
: i:Exit -:PrevPg Space:NextPg v:View Attachm. d:Del r:Reply j:Next ?:Help Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 20:44:40 +0100 From: Michal Kochanowicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Michal Kochanowicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: PGP lokalnie (e

Re: Mutt lies about PGP/GPG signature verification result

2002-03-19 Thread Michal Kochanowicz
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 09:41:06PM +, Dave Smith wrote: Maybe I'm being stupid here, but it appears that mutt and GPG are behaving correctly. How can it verify the signature on the message if it wasn't signed? Or maybe I'm stupid ;) Why write anything about signature if it wasn't signed?

Mutt lies about PGP/GPG signature verification result

2002-03-18 Thread Michal Kochanowicz
Hi My colegue came across some problem with mutt/GPG/PGP cooperation. It seem that for every _encrypted_ and encrypted/signed file mutt displays in status line information that signature could not be verified. And it displays it despite of that in the message area one can see that message is OK.

Re: Mutt lies about PGP/GPG signature verification result

2002-03-18 Thread Michal Kochanowicz
On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 05:10:59PM -0500, Justin R. Miller wrote: My colegue came across some problem with mutt/GPG/PGP cooperation. It seem that for every _encrypted_ and encrypted/signed file mutt displays in status line information that signature could not be verified. And it displays