Re: problems with 1.2.2i

2000-06-22 Thread Mike Markowski
On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 03:53:35AM +0200, clemensF [EMAIL PROTECTED] muttered: Mike Markowski: Notice that I now must put *two* slashes after "~mm". With only a single slash, I get this: how in the world did you find out? i would never have had the idea to try to put t

Re: problems with 1.2.2i

2000-06-21 Thread Mike Markowski
On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 10:13:03AM -0400, Daniel Monjar [EMAIL PROTECTED] muttered: Just grabbed 1.2.2i and did the install. Everything appeared to work well but mutt seg faults on invocation. I'm running on Solaris 8 without imap/ssl and it works without any noticable problems, except for a

Re: problems with 1.2.2i

2000-06-21 Thread Mike Markowski
On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 05:19:52PM +0200, Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED] muttered: On 2000-06-21 10:49:57 -0400, Mike Markowski wrote: Notice that I now must put *two* slashes after "~mm". With only a single slash, I get this: [...] It seems to swallow the f

Re: New Mail Polling

2000-03-14 Thread Mike Markowski
On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 12:33:25PM +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote: John P. Verel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Mon, 13 Mar 2000: Over the next couple days, I intend to try some XWindow biff-like clients and see how that goes. Keep in mind that some of the biff-style utilities will conflict

Re: setting limit in .muttrc

2000-02-15 Thread Mike Markowski
another way to do it? I used a folder-hook so that when returning to my main folder, it would again execute the 'push'. But I'm 2 weeks new to mutt, so I expect there are probably better solutions... Mike Cheers, Frank On Mon, Feb 14, 2000 at 01:29:26PM -0500, Mike Markowski wrote:

Re: peculiar requirement (maybe)

2000-02-14 Thread Mike Markowski
I use this: folder-hook . ;push 'l ! ~f "Mail System Internal Data"'\n and it seems to do the job. Maybe someone can explain why it doesn't work without that initial semicolon, though! :-) Thanks, Mike On Mon, Feb 14, 2000 at 06:56:41PM +0100, Frank Joerdens wrote: