On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 03:02:31PM +0200, René Clerc wrote:
* Stephane Bortzmeyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [16-10-2002 14:52]:
[about PGP signatures]
Or to hide it unless specifically called?
unset pgp_verify_sig
--
René Clerc - ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
There is a
On Sat, Oct 05, 2002 at 03:18:23PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
* Viktor Lakics [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-10-05 12:21]:
Has anyone ever tried to work out how to autoview graphics inside mutt?
To illustrate the point look at this screenshot:
http://lakics.homelinux.net/screenshot/shot.jpg
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 07:35:01PM +0200, René Clerc wrote:
* PeterKorman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [16-10-2002 16:30]:
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 03:02:31PM +0200, René Clerc wrote:
* Stephane Bortzmeyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [16-10-2002 14:52]:
[about PGP signatures]
Or to hide
It'z back.
My mutt viewer shows:
N^X¬µìm\212Ç^Z¹^u¼¦ºÛÿ²ø\236ÁêÿZ^\ÿÿÿ_^Aô^M;^D@u^LPúì^N¶^WÝE
for the attached distribution. I think there was a
thread for a problem like this not so long ago.
The distribution was encoded by a Mozilla 4.76 mailer.
There are 2 attachments. The second 1 was an
Who is the kind person responsible for the mutt.org
server?
Is it possible they lost a disk, or ran out of space,
or their firewall went kabluey now blocking everything?
Is is it now ok to post to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
since thats the only thing that works?
[JPK]
--
[]+ Wisdom is vindicated by
I'm wondering how the servers that manage the list
are set up. Is there 1 server that receives all
messages and many that send the messages to the
subscribers?
--
[]+ Wisdom is vindicated by all her children. +[]
[]
My mutt viewer shows:
N^X¬µìm\212Ç^Z¹^u¼¦ºÛÿ²ø\236ÁêÿZ^\ÿÿÿ_^Aô^M;^D@u^LPúì^N¶^WÝE
for the attached distribution. I think there was a
thread for a problem like this not so long ago.
The distribution was encoded by a Mozilla 4.76 mailer.
There are 2 attachments. The second 1 was an
On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 03:01:06PM -0700, Burton Samograd wrote:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 11:36:38PM +0200, Hans Ginzel wrote:
Something like:
:function reread_cfg_files
: reset all options to compile time
: source startup files as by usual start
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 10:28:56AM -0400, PeterKorman wrote:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 03:01:06PM -0700, Burton Samograd wrote:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 11:36:38PM +0200, Hans Ginzel wrote:
Something like:
:function reread_cfg_files
: reset all options to compile time
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 01:40:27PM +0200, Christian Ordig wrote:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 08:04:11PM -0400, PeterKorman wrote:
Here are the gory details. Much of my communication is not through
mailing lists. As a rule I don't go to a folder to exchange mail with
a particular person
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 12:42:17AM +0200, Christian Ordig wrote:
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 03:48:39AM +0200, René Clerc wrote:
* PeterKorman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [17-09-2002 19:21]:
I think I can correctly interpret what you said in more than 1 way.
So I wont try.
given:
1
Lotus Notes does archives too. As long as you dont mind
spending 90 seconds to start your mail client
and having it occupy 96 megs of RAM. Itz a very heavy
client.
[JPK]
On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 04:46:05PM -0400, Gil Hauer wrote:
Outlook does indeed allow the user to archive old email based
I just did some trivial tests.
I'm working on something with 34924 files in a single directory
on linux ext3. I timed a simple file remove it took 0.044 seconds.
Most people I know dont call this a low end system. Based on this
data I think that this particular machine can tolerate any
I'm set up with mutt to bcc all sent data to
a local address that qmail puts in the proper
Maildir subdirectory. Thatz fine for mailing list posts. But
If I want to thread normal conversations, I can't see the whole
converstion without bouncing between my sent directory and
my inbox.
I set this
On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 06:43:56PM +0200, René Clerc wrote:
Peter,
please send your questions to [EMAIL PROTECTED]!
Oops!
* PeterKorman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [17-09-2002 18:21]:
Is there a way to thread full (non news group) conversations
without duplicating and maintaining 2 copies
On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 06:39:08PM +0100, Bruno Postle wrote:
On Tue 17-Sep-2002 at 01:20:09 -0400, PeterKorman wrote:
My current method places messages 1 and 3 in my sent folder.
Message 2 goes into my inbox.
I could automatically put everything I send in both my inbox
and my sent
17 matches
Mail list logo
