On Wed, Nov 10, 1999 at 01:25:52PM +, Sean Rima wrote:
Hi Folks,
Seriously OT but maybe not. I went on holiday and left vacation to answer my
mail, however, it should not send any mail back to the list.
Ummm... simply put, use procmail/formail... you'll have less problems
with it.
On Wed, Nov 10, 1999 at 09:33:56PM +, Sean Rima wrote:
[Did 'vacation' cause me to get bounced off the list?]
Ummm... simply put, use procmail/formail... you'll have less problems
with it. (there are decent examples of making this work in the
procmailex man page)
There are, but
Ok... I'm probably just missing something simple, here... but how do you
forward a message to someone and include FULL headers (such as you would
do for forwarding spam messages to a service provider)?
Russell
--
Russell M. Van Tassell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Sep 02, 1999 at 09:51:27PM +0200, Frederick Page wrote:
Hi everybody,
got the latest from www.mutt.org and was trying to compile it, but as
in pre1, the same error persists:
/usr/src/mutt-1.0pre2-us# /usr/src/mutt-1.0pre2-us/configure
creating cache ./config.cache
checking for a
On Fri, Sep 03, 1999 at 01:09:11AM +0200, Frederick Page wrote:
(output from it might also be helpful, here... config.guess
specifically seems to run it with -m, -r, -s and -v (at different
times).
Quoting from "man uname":
If the -a option is given, the selected information is printed
I'm so used to seeing Mutt compile cleanly, I figured I'd share the
following warnings during the last compile... (reformated for read-
ability, of course)
SunOS 5.5.1 Generic_103640-18 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-1
gcc version 2.8.1
gcc -DSHAREDIR=\"/usr/local/share/mutt\"
On Fri, Jul 16, 1999 at 10:10:36AM -0500, Tim Walberg wrote:
[No MIME encapsulation through gateway to work]
Is this possibly something that Mutt is doing (i.e. a
relatively new feature that I haven't yet seen the documentation
on), or is it more likely something our (yuck!) Exchange
On Wed, Jul 14, 1999 at 09:00:54PM +0200, Marco Goetze wrote:
On Wed, Jul 14 1999, at 14:45 -0400, David Thorburn-Gundlach wrote:
I wanted to shoot a message to someone for analysis, so I carefully
set mime_fwd and then selected 'f'orward from the index. Imagine my
surprise when he asked me
On Sun, May 30, 1999 at 11:33:35AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting our friend -- Lars Hecking [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
There is some sort of convention that .sigs are separated from the body
by "-- " (dash dash space), and that .sigs should not be longer than
4 lines.
With all
On Sun, May 09, 1999 at 09:09:38PM +0200, Steve Crane wrote:
Hi All,
Pretty much since I joined this list I have had this problem but it
seems to have become worse of late.
Althought most messages to the list have [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the To
header, there are a number that don't. These
On Sat, May 01, 1999 at 02:58:17AM +0200, Stefan `Sec` Zehl wrote:
On Fri, Apr 30, 1999 at 05:15:09PM -0700, Russell Van Tassell wrote:
[..]
set signature="/usr/bin/cat /usr/home/russell/.signature |"
However, if you wanted to extend that to a send-hook, it ba
Ok, I know this is in the online manual but it's a bit ambiguous... it
basically says that "Hooks that act upon messages re evaluated in a
slightly different manner" (than anything else in the config file, I
guess). That statement is also followed with an incomplete sentence
making the whole
Stupid question: how the heck do I "unlimit" a limit command? Normally, I tend
to like to limit message down to a certain pattern and view just those messages
(to make sure I've gotten it right) and then perform a specific operation on all
of those messages (eg. save them to a file or folder
On Wed, Apr 28, 1999 at 06:46:49PM +0200, Stefan `Sec` Zehl wrote:
On Wed, Apr 28, 1999 at 08:54:27AM -0700, Russell Van Tassell wrote:
Stupid question: how the heck do I "unlimit" a limit command?
[...]
You can use any of these patterns at the limit command to effectivel
On Mon, Apr 12, 1999 at 02:45:22PM -0700, rex wrote:
It's fairly common for ISPs to put mail addressed to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] into username's mailbox with the "+whatever"
intact. This is a handy feature for filtering, seeing who's selling
your email addy, etc. In effect, you've got as many
On Wed, 24 Mar 1999, Daniel Eisenbud wrote:
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 22:00:24 -0800
From: Daniel Eisenbud [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Russell Van Tassell [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Mutt "runs aways" when it loses tty
Can you attach to the process with gdb and g
This really should be on the Procmail list (send a request to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]), but... so far, I think
everyone's not quite right...
If you're trying to use procmail to filter everything on this list in
to a foler, you need to go for a header that the list software will
set for every message
Trying to compile Mutt 0.95.4i on Solaris 2.5.1 I noticed the
following... other than that, it seemed to have compiled cleanly...
-- begin
make all-recursive
Making all in doc
make html
sgml2html manual
sh: sgml2html: not found
*** Error code 1
make: Fatal error: Command failed for target
18 matches
Mail list logo
