Re: viewing html emails in mutt

2000-05-02 Thread Tom Hall
On Tue, May 02, 2000 at 02:49:49PM -0400, Jim Toth wrote: On Tue, May 02, 2000 at 02:38:23PM -0400, Hardy Merrill ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: Another newbie question - I've setup my .mailcap file to include text/html; lynx %s [snip--sees source not html formatted] I'm expecting to see

Reply to html messages

2000-04-12 Thread Tom Hall
When I go to reply to a message that was sent in HTML format, mutt doesn't quote the original message. The reply body just has the $attribution string. Is there a way to get mutt to pipe the message through lynx and include it in the body of the reply ? (with the $indent_str ?) - Tom

Re: Email client poll

1999-07-19 Thread Tom Hall
On Fri, Jul 16, 1999 at 03:42:32PM -0500, Mark Bainter wrote: Why in the world would it be beneficial to have pre-compiled DOS and/or W32 binaries available? This smells more like digging for trouble to me. Lynx does it. If I want to do some quick web browsing, and I'm stuck running W95 at

Re: Email client poll

1999-07-16 Thread Tom Hall
On Fri, Jul 16, 1999 at 10:46:09AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So we can win 'mindshare', and mutt will continue to work as the 'net evolves. See http://www.cryptonomicon.com/beginning.html. I think we're not giving people enough credit. Just because they use some other mailer we

Re: Email client poll

1999-07-15 Thread Tom Hall
On Thu, Jul 15, 1999 at 03:02:54PM -0500, Jeremy Blosser wrote: Holger Eitzenberger [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: ...So if it's just inertia (and we care), then maybe some advocacy needs to be done. If it's advocacy you want, release pre-compiled binaries for W32 and/or DOS. PC hackers will

Re: standard output

1999-07-14 Thread Tom Hall
On Wed, Jul 14, 1999 at 03:29:23PM -0700, wrote: Re hello and thanks to those who answered but... maybe I didn't explain clearly... I know how to pipe to sendmail or other, but I don't know how to have mutt write the message to a file (or to the standard output) is there a