Various people wrote:
> 1. Do many people use the "X-No-Archive: Yes" Header to prevent their
> postings appearing on google groups. Is this bad practice to use by
> default in emails etc?
The idea of public mailing lists is that information is archived for
future use; if you want to disable th
> > From what I can currently see, mutt will always take > username>@ as my FROM address. So - any
> > ideas if I can easily tell it to set a reply's FROM address from the
> > context of the message I am replying to, as described above?
>
> I don't think it's possible to do this within the conte
> From what I can currently see, mutt will always take username>@ as my FROM address. So - any
> ideas if I can easily tell it to set a reply's FROM address from the
> context of the message I am replying to, as described above?
I don't think it's possible to do this within the context of the ms
Wow, I must have hit a hot topic here...
Let me summarize a bit.
If work is local, one can fire up a second mutt. I use xmutt, which
essentially contains xterm -e mutt. It still involves more typing than
I'd ideally like, but computing's like that. This method will corrupt
flags in other running
> Hi, i'm a pine user, but i want to know if mutt can
> handle many pop accounts?,
Not really, or rather, depends.
Mutt isn't designed to download mail, use fetchmail etc for this, but it
does allow to view a remote pop box. fetchmail is fine.
As for sending mail, features are a bit lacking. Th
Is there a way to read other emails of the same folder while composing
one? (Other than cranking up a second mutt.)
Thanks,
Volker
--
Volker Kuhlmann is possibly list0570 with the domain in header
http://volker.orcon.net.nz/ Please do not CC list postings to me.
I have set edit_headers. Why does mutt not add a Sender: header line
when I add that to the headers in the editor? It works with other
headers, but Sender: is actively removed. Likewise with my_hdr. It shows
up the first time in the editor, but then mutt takes the liberty to
delete this as soon as
> % Don't tell me the list has more than one address... do I need to have
> % multiple subscribe lines for it? Ugh.
>
> While it only has one correct address, sometimes the gbnet address leaks
> through. You probably don't want to subscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> though, because you'd only be pro
Hi all,
I've just been through some frustration finding out why mutt and kmail
just don't want to cooperate (bug 41008 at bugs.kde.org).
The upshot of that seems to be that Content-Length: is a non-standard
extension, with RFC saying it's deprecated (if not discouraged).
There's a big rant about
