Re: Has the handling of my_hdr and send_hook changed between 1.10.x and 2.1.4?

On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 10:00:28AM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 09:19:04AM +0100, Chris Green wrote: > >On Sun, Apr 09, 2023 at 02:28:00PM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > >> It's working in my simple testing, so perhaps there is something more > >> involved. Can you

Has the handling of my_hdr and send_hook changed between 1.10.x and 2.1.4?

I'm trying to sort out why something that used to work for me no longer works. I just went and tried out an older installation that still runs mutt 1.10.4 and there my send-hook/my_hdr configuration works. It doesn't work on my current mutt 2.1.4. I see the documentation now says "Also note that

Re: Can I fix this groups.io problem with a send hook or something

On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 11:01:37AM -0500, John Hawkinson wrote: > Chris Green wrote on Tue, 24 Nov 2020 > at 10:59:12 EST in <20201124155912.GL887493@esprimo>: > > > > Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 15:59:12 + > > From: Chris Green > > To: mutt-users@mutt.org > > Subject: Can I fix this groups.io

Re: Access to where I am in mail hierarchy when using mutt

On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 10:16:37PM +, Eur Ing Chris Green wrote: On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 10:58:10PM +0100, Christoph Berg wrote: Re: Eur Ing Chris Green 2007-02-16 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is there any variable or anything that can be used in mutt macros to say where one is in the mail

Re: Mixing maildir and mbox

On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 10:26:57AM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote: On 2007-02-07 09:20:51 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can solve the problem by switching to maildir, however I'd prefer not to keep my saved/archived mail in maildir format, is it possible (or sensible) to mix the two

Mixing maildir and mbox

This follows on from my recent question about mutt not recognising new mail which turned out to be due to the 'noatime' setting on the disk drives in question. I can solve the problem by switching to maildir, however I'd prefer not to keep my saved/archived mail in maildir format, is it possible

Not seeing new mail at all - BSD system

I am migrating my main mail reading activity from a Linux system (this one) to a BSD one. So I have copied across my muttrc file and a few other rlated bits and pieces and I'm testing mutt on the new (to me) system. Mail is arriving as expected and getting delivered (by the same Perl script as I

Re: Not seeing new mail at all - BSD system

On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 02:11:48PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am migrating my main mail reading activity from a Linux system (this one) to a BSD one. So I have copied across my muttrc file and a few other rlated bits and pieces and I'm testing mutt on the new (to me) system. Mail

Re: Not seeing new mail at all - BSD system

On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 07:42:29AM -0700, Kyle Wheeler wrote: On Tuesday, February 6 at 02:37 PM, quoth [EMAIL PROTECTED]: A connected question - is there a way from within mutt to see what a variable is set to? :set ?variable Ah, I knew there was a ? involved somewhere but I couldn't

Re: Not seeing new mail at all - BSD system

On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 08:52:47AM -0700, Darrin Chandler wrote: On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 02:37:53PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 02:11:48PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am migrating my main mail reading activity from a Linux system (this one) to a BSD one.

Re: Not seeing new mail at all - BSD system

On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 03:58:56PM +0100, Michael Tatge wrote: * On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered: Mail is arriving as expected and getting delivered (by the same Perl script as I was using on the Linux system) to various mailing list mailboxes etc.

Re: Mailbox is read-only., but it isn't

On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 09:04:57AM +0100, Michael Tatge wrote: * On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered: On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 04:32:26PM +0100, Michael Tatge wrote: * On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered: I can 'mutt_dotlock

Re: Mailbox is read-only., but it isn't

oN tHU, Jan 25, 2007 at 02:26:56PM +0100, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote: * [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 09:04:57AM +0100, Michael Tatge wrote: * On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered: On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 04:32:26PM +0100,

Re: Mailbox is read-only., but it isn't

On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 05:39:17PM +0100, Rado S wrote: Moin, check permissions per wiki-FAQ, check 'mutt -v|grep -i lock' to you use proper locking. Brilliant! That's the problem, /var/mail is:- lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 10 Oct 16 1999 /var/mail the group should be

Re: Mailbox is read-only., but it isn't

On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 08:48:16PM +0100, Stephan Seitz wrote: On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 06:18:11PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Brilliant! That's the problem, /var/mail is:- lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 10 Oct 16 1999 /var/mail Are you sure? This is a symlink, look at the l

Re: Mailbox is read-only., but it isn't

On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 01:39:43PM +0100, Michael Tatge wrote: * On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered: The mail spool file is /var/mail/cgreen, permissions are:- -rw-rw1 cgreen mail 835067 Jan 24 09:38 /var/mail/cgreen I can edit the

Re: Mailbox is read-only., but it isn't

On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 03:35:47PM +0100, René Clerc wrote: * [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [24-01-2007 15:25]: On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 01:39:43PM +0100, Michael Tatge wrote: * On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered: The mail spool file is

Re: Mailbox is read-only., but it isn't

On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 04:32:26PM +0100, Michael Tatge wrote: * On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered: On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 01:39:43PM +0100, Michael Tatge wrote: * On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered: The mail spool file