Is there any way to pass extra parameters to gpg?
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
just wondering if there is a next-message command or something in the
index, I want to be able to just go to the next message in some instances,
but if a message has been read once, and is marked for deletion,. then using
the commands such
* Jeremy Blosser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It isn't at all. Mostly we were talking about people using other mailers
(like Pine) not because they liked the features the most but out of
inertia. As I said, *if we care*, there are things we could try to do
about this. If we don't care, we
* David Thorburn-Gundlach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
% Why is it so important that Mutt be #1 on a Slashdot poll?
% Just curious.
BECAUSE MUTT RULZ, d00d!!!
Then it should promote itself, G.
* Tom Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So we can win 'mindshare', and mutt will continue to work as the 'net
evolves. See http://www.cryptonomicon.com/beginning.html.
I think we're not giving people enough credit. Just because they
use some other mailer we think it's because they're forced to or
David DeSimone wrote:
So don't leave Mutt.
macro index G "shell-escapefetchmailenter"
Sweet.
Thomas Roessler wrote:
Me too. Just thought it might be convenient sometimes to not have
to leave mutt.
So just run fetchmail in daemon mode.
Not very convenient on a dialup connection. Usually when
I want my mail I want it NOW! (yes, I know about demand
dialing) I think the macro suits me
Randall J. Million wrote:
Write a macro that will call fetchmail. Should work, but I don't use
fetchmail.
I'll look into that.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why not use fetchmail instead? I'm using qmail+fetchmail+procmail+mutt
over here.
Me too. Just thought it might be convenient sometimes to not have
to leave mutt.
