Thomas, et al --
...and then Thomas Roessler said...
%
% I've just released the next mutt beta, version 1.3.24i.
I see the new PATCHES file and its use in the ChangeLog. Yay :-)
One thing that I note is that, unless I'm confused (not out of the
question by any means), the patches will be
David T-G wrote:
I see the new PATCHES file and its use in the ChangeLog. Yay :-)
Apropos the PATCHES file:
I just wanted to apply the patch-1.3.24.vvv.initials patch mentioned a
few postings above (the only other patch I use in addition is
patch-1.3.24.vvv.nntp). In both cases -p1 is the
Daniel, et al --
First, I vaguely recall your mention of further improved threading code
on the way. If my questions will all be answered in the Next Coming (er,
Coding :-) then please let me know and otherwise ignore this.
...and then Daniel Eisenbud said...
%
% On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at
On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 02:50:44PM -0500, David T-G
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
% subject. The question mark denotes a missing reference. So if a
This I also understand -- but it seems to be too over-the-top. I've been
known to clear out everything except a final useful message deep in a
Hi Volker,
* Volker Moell [EMAIL PROTECTED] [12/09/01 20:40]:
David T-G wrote:
I see the new PATCHES file and its use in the ChangeLog. Yay :-)
Apropos the PATCHES file:
I just wanted to apply the patch-1.3.24.vvv.initials patch mentioned a
few postings above (the only other patch I
On Sun, Dec 9, 2001, Daniel Eisenbud wrote:
Okay, I read this and am still confused about something. I understand
about the '?' and '*', but why the multiple '?'s?
A series of referenced messages that don't exist.
Oh, the References: header. Gotcha. :)
Looking forward to the new patch
Daniel --
...and then Daniel Eisenbud said...
%
% On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 02:50:44PM -0500, David T-G
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
% % subject. The question mark denotes a missing reference. So if a
%
% This I also understand -- but it seems to be too over-the-top. I've been
...
%
% This
On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 06:25:03PM -0500, David T-G
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Daniel --
...and then Daniel Eisenbud said...
%
% On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 02:50:44PM -0500, David T-G
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
% % subject. The question mark denotes a missing reference. So if a
%
%
Hi all!
On Fri, 30 Nov 2001, Thomas Roessler wrote:
I've just released the next mutt beta, version 1.3.24i.
Some of the more interesting changes against mutt-1.3.23i:
Just a question: are you also announcing to mutt-annunce?
I've subscribed it, but never read any announcments...
Ciao for
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 23:21:27 -0800, Dairy Wall Limey wrote:
hrmm this makes sense... setting this does change the number of '?'s...
putting:
set hide_missing
gives one question mark,
Here, I get several question marks ($hide_missing set). :(
is there a way to hide the question marks
Thomas Roessler [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
I've just released the next mutt beta, version 1.3.24i.
And I've just updated the web site to this version, since it is a public
beta.
I've updated the official release areas (news, changes, manual, etc.)
already, and I'll update the user-contributed
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 02:32:19PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 23:21:27 -0800, Dairy Wall Limey wrote:
hrmm this makes sense... setting this does change the number of '?'s...
putting:
set hide_missing
gives one question mark,
Here, I get
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 15:09:36 -0500, Daniel Eisenbud wrote:
I had a patch that added a $narrow_tree variable years ago, which made
the thread tree take up only half as much screen real estate. Maybe
it's time to resurrect this too.
Yes, I updated it to apply it to the latest Mutt versions
Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 15:09:36 -0500, Daniel Eisenbud wrote:
I had a patch that added a $narrow_tree variable years ago, which
made the thread tree take up only half as much screen real estate.
Maybe it's time to resurrect this too.
Yes, I updated it to apply
Daniel Eisenbud wrote:
$hide_missing only hides the leading message if they can sensibly be
hidden.
sorry... one more thing:
messages that have an asterisk (ie mutt is guessing based on subject
line or whatever) seem to be showing up with a '?' after the asterisk,
even in a thread that's
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 02:46:07PM -0800, Owner of many system processes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Daniel Eisenbud wrote:
$hide_missing only hides the leading message if they can sensibly be
hidden.
sorry... one more thing:
messages that have an asterisk (ie mutt is guessing based on
I've just released the next mutt beta, version 1.3.24i.
Some of the more interesting changes against mutt-1.3.23i:
- New and improved threading code from Daniel Eisenbud. See also
$duplicate_threads, $hide_missing, $thread_received.
- ANSI colors in the builtin pager are now controlled
Thomas Roessler wrote:
I've just released the next mutt beta, version 1.3.24i.
Some of the more interesting changes against mutt-1.3.23i:
- New and improved threading code from Daniel Eisenbud. See also
$duplicate_threads, $hide_missing, $thread_received.
i'm sorry if i'm missing
David Champion wrote:
Dairy Wall Limey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[responding on list again in case someone else has any ideas]
i'm sorry if i'm missing something obvious, but since installing 1.3.24,
the trees that indicate threads are showing up a bit funny. each '-' is
preceeded with a
19 matches
Mail list logo
