Re: [Q] Couln't lock mailbox - FAQ?

2000-10-18 Thread David T-G
Suresh -- ...and then Suresh Ramasubramanian said... % David T-G proclaimed on mutt-users that: % % Are you sure that shouldn't be 2775 instead? I don't think we need % stickiness, but to ensure that only root and mail can write in there... % % Not the mailboxes - the directory

Re: [Q] Couln't lock mailbox - FAQ?

2000-10-18 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
On Wed, 18 Oct 2000, David T-G wrote: "overly restirctive" eh? new reason to switch to mutt - pine is a security risk :^) % permissions on the spool directory for running Pine are 1777, i.e. % read-write-execute permission for everyone, with the sticky-bit set, so only % owners

[Q] Couln't lock mailbox - FAQ?

2000-10-17 Thread abnay
I suspect this is an FAQ. However, I couldn't find the answer. On Tru64 (Digital Unix) I configured mutt with --enable-flock --disable-fcntl together, only one of them as well as without either of them. In all cases, when I read my mail with the resulting executable and try to save a message, I

Re: [Q] Couln't lock mailbox - FAQ?

2000-10-17 Thread David T-G
Bharadwaj -- ...and then [EMAIL PROTECTED] said... % I suspect this is an FAQ. However, I couldn't It very well might be :-) % find the answer. On Tru64 (Digital Unix) I % configured mutt with --enable-flock --disable-fcntl % together, only one of them as well as without either Sure; those

Re: [Q] Couln't lock mailbox - FAQ?

2000-10-17 Thread abnay
David, Thanks for the quick reply. Although this was happenning on mailboxes that live in my user area and that have the right permissions, setting execute premissions of mutt_dotlock (they were not set initially) did the trick. Thanks again, Bharadwaj (Mutt can bounce AND thread!! Time

Re: [Q] Couln't lock mailbox - FAQ?

2000-10-17 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
David T-G proclaimed on mutt-users that: and that means that only root and the mail group -- and that probably means *not* you - can write in there. To get around that but not tie so much power into mutt itself, there is a little binary called mutt_dotlock which should be installed with

Re: [Q] Couln't lock mailbox - FAQ?

2000-10-17 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
[EMAIL PROTECTED] proclaimed on mutt-users that: (Mutt can bounce AND thread!! Time has come to abandon ELM !!) sig fodder, several years ago ;) -- Suresh Ramasubramanian + Wallopus Malletus Indigenensis mallet @ cluestick.org + Lumber Cartel of India, tinlcI Pardon this fortune.

Re: [Q] Couln't lock mailbox - FAQ?

2000-10-17 Thread David T-G
Suresh -- ...and then Suresh Ramasubramanian said... % David T-G proclaimed on mutt-users that: % % and that means that only root and the mail group -- and that probably % % Oh - and make sure /var/spool/mail has 1777 permissions. Are you sure that shouldn't be 2775 instead? I don't

Re: [Q] Couln't lock mailbox - FAQ?

2000-10-17 Thread David T-G
Bharadwaj -- ...and then [EMAIL PROTECTED] said... % David, % % Thanks for the quick reply. You're quite welcome. % % Although this was happenning on mailboxes that % live in my user area and that have the right Really? You mean you had a mailbox in a directory like $HOME/Mail and the

Re: [Q] Couln't lock mailbox - FAQ?

2000-10-17 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
David T-G proclaimed on mutt-users that: Are you sure that shouldn't be 2775 instead? I don't think we need stickiness, but to ensure that only root and mail can write in there... Not the mailboxes - the directory /var/spool/mail/ ... From the pine 4.21 docs ... In installations like