On 12-09-29 19:47:24, Sebastian Tramp wrote:
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 11:46:55AM +0200, P. Mazart wrote:
… [Content-Disposition-Header] … But I must disagree: a *lot* of people
are
using the stock MUA. Simply because they don't care. That's why this issue
shouldn't be neglected
On 2012-09-29, P. Mazart pmaz...@web.de wrote:
Ambrevar schrieb am 28.09.2012 13:22:13:
??? [Content-Disposition-Header] ???
But I must disagree: a *lot* of people are using the stock MUA.
Simply because they don't care. That's why this issue shouldn't be
neglected.
I agree
On 12-09-29 19:47:24, Sebastian Tramp wrote:
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 11:46:55AM +0200, P. Mazart wrote:
… [Content-Disposition-Header] … But I must disagree: a *lot* of people
are
using the stock MUA. Simply because they don't care. That's why this issue
shouldn't be neglected
On 12-09-27 17:53:43, Jim Graham wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 12:07:51PM -0500, Luis Mochan wrote:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 11:06:00PM +0200, Ambrevar wrote:
I don't recall any problem reading with Android 2.1 mail sent by
mutt. I use K-9 as my Android mail client in my phone.
Best
to the conclusion
that
it comes from the 'Content-Disposition' that Mutt includes in the header of
every e-mail. This feature does not seem to be toggable by the end-user (even
though you can change the value of the Content-Disposition, but this does not
solve the issue). This header is standard
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 12:07:51PM -0500, Luis Mochan wrote:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 11:06:00PM +0200, Ambrevar wrote:
I don't recall any problem reading with Android 2.1 mail sent by
mutt. I use K-9 as my Android mail client in my phone.
Best regards,
My fellows recently let me aware of
may name 'Unknown.txt').
I've been investigating around for a while and I've come to the conclusion that
it comes from the 'Content-Disposition' that Mutt includes in the header of
every e-mail. This feature does not seem to be toggable by the end-user (even
though you can change the value
Am 2008-09-06 22:10:12, schrieb Antoine Kaufmann:
Hi,
I'm new to mutt. I often send patches to mailing lists, and I would like
mutt to set Content-Disposition to inline whenever I attach a Patch to a
new mail. Because otherwise i forget half the time to do this manually
Hi,
I'm new to mutt. I often send patches to mailing lists, and I would like
mutt to set Content-Disposition to inline whenever I attach a Patch to a
new mail. Because otherwise i forget half the time to do this manually.
;-)
Is there a way to do this?
Thanks in advance
--
Antoine Kaufmann
!
% in the message going out as two (or more) parts -- the message, and the
% signature. Both have a 'Content-Disposition: inline' header, which I
% take it means that the MUA is supposed to display the attachment inline,
% since both are of type text/plain.
Yep.
%
% Anyway, I just got a mail from
the kind of people who tend to know this stuff :-
I send my mail with Mutt and I always sign it with GnuPG. That results
in the message going out as two (or more) parts -- the message, and the
signature. Both have a 'Content-Disposition: inline' header, which I
take it means that the MUA
Am Mit, 12 Sep 2001, schrieb Justin R. Miller:
I send my mail with Mutt and I always sign it with GnuPG. That results
in the message going out as two (or more) parts -- the message, and the
signature. Both have a 'Content-Disposition: inline' header, which I
take it means that the MUA
My problem is the following. I use mutt from a perl script to send different
type of docs as an attachment automaticaly. It is working correctly but the
Content-Disposition is inline and Outlook Express doesn't feel it to be attachment at
all.
On the other hand in interactive mode i can send
changing the filenam= part of the
Content-Disposition.
Doing this was really easy in elmME+ (in the attachement menu). The
only feature that looks like it should be doing it is the R command
in the attachment menu, i.e. the 'rename-file' command. However,
changing something.extension
Clemens Vonrhein ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said something to this effect on
05/11/2001:
after changing from elmME+ to mutt (mainly because of threads and
colors) I'm unable to find one feature I really got used to:
After attaching the file, in the compose menu, use the arrow keys
to select the
No, it's currently not possible, unfortunately.
Too bad.
Wouldn't a variable like "disposition-default" be a good idea?
Are any developers listening here? :-)
Or maybe an extension to mailcap like copiousoutput, or like netscape is
doing it with the "x-mozilla-flags"?
Andy.
--
E-Mail:
Bruce DeVisser wrote:
^D on the compose menu toggles this, under Mutt 1.2.5i.
(If I hit ? in the compose menu, it's the very first keybinding
described. :)
Great! I just upgraded and really like this feature.
Now I am wondering how I can set the default of disposition to I(nline).
I can't
On 2000.09.26, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
"Andy Spiegl" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bruce DeVisser wrote:
^D on the compose menu toggles this, under Mutt 1.2.5i.
(If I hit ? in the compose menu, it's the very first keybinding
described. :)
Great! I just upgraded and really like
Well, you can set a compose macro to inline after adding.
Ehmm, sounds like a good idea, but how do I do that?
Sorry for the stupid question,
Andy.
--
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] URL: http://andy.spiegl.de
PGP/GPG: see headers
o _ _ _
On 2000.09.26, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
"Andy Spiegl" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, you can set a compose macro to inline after adding.
Ehmm, sounds like a good idea, but how do I do that?
Sorry for the stupid question,
Andy.
Actually, I think it was a bad idea. I guess you can't
is asking how to set the
content-disposition of an attachement to "inline". This is not
done with edit-type (^T) rather than with a separate function,
toggle-disposition (^D). No need to macro that.
Regards,
Mikko
--
// Mikko Hänninen, aka. Wizzu // [EMAIL PROTECTED] // h
Hi!
When I send a mail with a JPG-attachment to a friend that uses the netscape
mailer, the picture does not get displayed inline, but when I use netscape
to send this mail, it does get displayed inline. So, I compared the two
mails and found that mutt writes:
Content-Disposition: attachment
On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 01:29:10PM +0200, Andy Spiegl wrote:
Is there a way I can teach mutt to use "inline", too?
I am currently using Mutt 1.0.1i
^D on the compose menu toggles this, under Mutt 1.2.5i.
(If I hit ? in the compose menu, it's the very first keybinding
described. :)
--
-
23 matches
Mail list logo
