Dirk --
Please don't just reply to some message and start a new thread; because
mutt threads so well, we get an unrelated message in the middle of
another thread. I may be assuming a lot, but the new Subject: and the
apparently completely unrelated text in the note really make it seem
like this
At 16:02 +0200 19 Jun 2000, Dirk Ruediger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible to process the entries of "subscribe" or "lists" to use
it for send-hook, e.g.:
Read section 4.2 of the manual. Especially the part about the ~l
pattern.
--
Aaron Schrab [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dirk Ruediger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Mon, 19 Jun 2000:
I want to define an implicite send-hook for all mailing lists I am
subscribed to and define a special attribution, use special signatures
and something like that.
Is it possible to process the entries of "subscribe" or "lists" to
Hi all!
I want to define an implicite send-hook for all mailing lists I am
subscribed to and define a special attribution, use special signatures
and something like that.
Is it possible to process the entries of "subscribe" or "lists" to use
it for send-hook, e.g.:
send-hook ($subsribe) 'set
Hello Dirk!
On Mon, 19 Jun 2000, Dirk Ruediger wrote:
I want to define an implicite send-hook for all mailing lists I am
subscribed to and define a special attribution, use special signatures
and something like that.
Is it possible to process the entries of "subscribe" or "lists" to use
