On Mi, 19 Jul 2017, Don Saklad wrote:
> How might deleted messages be put in some setup for trash then if no
> exceptions fully deleted later?
:set trash=
Have a look at the manual. Note this feature has been available as a
patch in older versions, but recent mutt versions suppor
* Don Saklad [07-19-17 16:18]:
> How might deleted messages be put in some setup for trash then if no
> exceptions fully deleted later?
instead of deleting on first look, save them to a folder intended for
deletion later and then delete from that folder when you feel like it.
ps, your
How might deleted messages be put in some setup for trash then if no exceptions
fully deleted later?
1.5.23 to get a version with man bug fixes
Have tried it, but there is no change...
The deleted messages stay in the box forever as "deleted" and are not
purged
> - Restart your mail server?
It is a local filesystem. GMail and my Courier-IMAP have no problems
with purging de
Good day Jostein,
On 2016-01-29 00:31:16 Jostein Berntsen hacked into the keyboard:
> Have some updates happened on your system recently? Some things to
> check:
No
> - Do you use mutt with the trash patch?
> http://cedricduval.free.fr/mutt/patches/#trash
You mean
> - Upgrade mutt to v. 1.5.23
On 29.01.16,00:08, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Good evening,
I do not know, what I have done, but since arround 6 hours, mutt does
not purge deleted messages IF I access a "Maildir" localy without IMAP!
set delete=ask-yes
is unchanged for ages and it works perfectly with GMail m
Good evening,
I do not know, what I have done, but since arround 6 hours, mutt does
not purge deleted messages IF I access a "Maildir" localy without IMAP!
set delete=ask-yes
is unchanged for ages and it works perfectly with GMail my Intranet- and
public Mail-Server.
"$
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 07:34:24AM +0100, Francis Moreau wrote:
> however if mutt considers to implement a very low quality trash, what does
> that mean ?
>
> 1/ Mutt developpers are lazy ;)
> 2/ There are so few people needing a trash by default that it
> really doesn't worth to implem
On Wed 16.Jan.08 07:34, Francis Moreau wrote:
however if mutt considers to implement a very low quality trash, what
does that mean ?
1/ Mutt developpers are lazy ;)
2/ There are so few people needing a trash by default that it
really doesn't worth to implement a trash
3/ Mutt folks con
On Jan 15, 2008 11:05 PM, Angel Olivera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue 15.Jan.08 09:38, Francis Moreau wrote:
> > On Jan 14, 2008 6:28 PM, Kyle Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Monday, January 14 at 05:59 PM, quoth Francis Moreau:
> >>> It seems that Trash is not really welcome in Mu
On Tue 15.Jan.08 09:38, Francis Moreau wrote:
On Jan 14, 2008 6:28 PM, Kyle Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Monday, January 14 at 05:59 PM, quoth Francis Moreau:
It seems that Trash is not really welcome in Mutt.
By what metric? The fact that support for it isn't built-in (added via
tw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Francis Moreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01-15-08 03:39]:
>
> I was wondering what was bad to have a trash...
>
Your answer: Nothing is wrong with having a trash container. You
are welcome to have a trash container if you wish one. It is as
simple a
utt does it on a folder-by-folder basis, while other
> applications (e.g. Thunderbird) approach it on an account-by-account
> basis. When you think about email on an account-by-account basis,
> things like folders with special purposes makes more sense. Thus, in
> other applications,
mutt "delete means mark the message as deleted"
makes more sense (why would mutt assume that you have (or should have)
a special folder for deleted messages? By moving the message to a
Trash folder, you are losing the information about where it came
from.).
However, you can easily make m
On Jan 14, 2008 5:59 PM, John Velman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This works for me ( in .muttrc).
>
> _
>
> # poor mans trash
Honestly I'm wondering what's wrong with Trash.
It seems that Trash is not really welcome in Mutt.
--
Francis
On Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 02:15:45PM +1100, hce wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I saw some discussions on how to set up a trash for deleted messages,
> but could not find details. Could anyone show me:
>
> (a) a setup command to move all deleted messages to a trash file?
>
> (b) A key bi
Hi,
I saw some discussions on how to set up a trash for deleted messages,
but could not find details. Could anyone show me:
(a) a setup command to move all deleted messages to a trash file?
(b) A key bind to delete messages in trash permanently?
Thank you.
Jim
Rob --
...and then Feztaa said...
%
% Alas! David T-G spake thus:
% > % I haven't tested it with these macros, but when I save a message to the
% > % same folder it's in, it deletes the original message and appends the
% > % message to the mailbox (so it immediately appears in the index). Nothi
--DocE+STaALJfprDB
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Alas! David T-G spake thus:
> % I haven't tested it with these macros, but when I save a message to the
> % same folder it's in, it deletes the original message a
Phil --
...and then Phil Gregory said...
%
% * Rob 'Feztaa' Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-01 20:15 -0700]:
% > Alas! Andreas Reinhold spake thus:
% > > On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 07:59:59PM -0500, Justin R. Miller wrote:
% > > > macro pager d "=trash" "move message to trash
folder"
...
* Rob 'Feztaa' Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-01 20:15 -0700]:
> Alas! Andreas Reinhold spake thus:
> > On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 07:59:59PM -0500, Justin R. Miller wrote:
> > > macro pager d "=trash" "move message to trash folder"
> >
> > Thanks, this really works fine!
>
> Unless you happen
Hello James,
On Tuesday, January 15, 2002 at 12:52:43 PM -0700, James Hamilton wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 07:59:59PM -0500, Justin R. Miller wrote:
>
>> macro pager d "=trash" "move message to trash folder"
>
> The method listed below makes me answer yes to each message I delete
Simp
James --
...and then James Hamilton said...
%
% I usually delete a whole slue of messages at a time. For example I had ~150
messages to scan through in my inbox this morning. Most of them spam system email
etc. Can someone suggest a way to mark them for deletion then when i sync-mailbox
ha
Andreas, et al --
...and then Andreas Herceg said...
%
% On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 05:11:32PM -0600, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
% | On Jan 15, Andreas Herceg [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
% | > On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 02:57:07PM -0500, Justin R. Miller wrote:
% | > | Use what I recommended, in addition to
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 05:11:32PM -0600, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
| On Jan 15, Andreas Herceg [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
| > On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 02:57:07PM -0500, Justin R. Miller wrote:
| > | Use what I recommended, in addition to a modified $delete value (consult
| > | the manual). The delete
On Jan 15, Andreas Herceg [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 02:57:07PM -0500, Justin R. Miller wrote:
> | Thus spake James Hamilton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> | > Can someone suggest a way to mark them for deletion then when i
> | > sync-mailbox have the messages marked for deletion
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 02:57:07PM -0500, Justin R. Miller wrote:
| Thus spake James Hamilton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
| > Can someone suggest a way to mark them for deletion then when i
| > sync-mailbox have the messages marked for deletion move to the trash
| > folder? The method listed below makes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thus spake James Hamilton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Can someone suggest a way to mark them for deletion then when i
> sync-mailbox have the messages marked for deletion move to the trash
> folder? The method listed below makes me answer yes to each mes
old ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > i'm wondering how to tell my mutt to not completely delete messages
> > marked with a "D", but move them to my trash-folder instead.
> >
> > My sent messages are recorded in a "sent"-folder. I think storing
> >
* Rob 'Feztaa' Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-01-10 20:15]:
> Alas! Andreas Reinhold spake thus:
> > On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 07:59:59PM -0500, Justin R. Miller wrote:
> > > macro pager d "=trash" "move message to trash folder"
> > > macro index d "=trash" "move message to trash folder"
> > >
s are recorded in a "sent"-folder. I think storing deleted
> messages must be arranged in a similar way. But how? :)
>
There's a very good patch for this, which you can get at
mutt.justpickone.org (among other places I imagine)
It's called patch-1.3.25.cd.trash
Alas! Andreas Reinhold spake thus:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 07:59:59PM -0500, Justin R. Miller wrote:
> > macro pager d "=trash" "move message to trash folder"
> > macro index d "=trash" "move message to trash folder"
> > macro pager \cD "\et;=trash" "move thread to trash folder"
> >
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 07:59:59PM -0500, Justin R. Miller wrote:
> macro pager d "=trash" "move message to trash folder"
> macro index d "=trash" "move message to trash folder"
> macro pager \cD "\et;=trash" "move thread to trash folder"
> macro index \cD "\et;=trash" "mo
Thus spake Andreas Reinhold ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> i'm wondering how to tell my mutt to not completely delete messages
> marked with a "D", but move them to my trash-folder instead.
>
> My sent messages are recorded in a "sent"-folder. I think storing
>
Hi,
i'm wondering how to tell my mutt to not completely delete messages marked
with a "D", but move them to my trash-folder instead.
My sent messages are recorded in a "sent"-folder. I think storing deleted
messages must be arranged in a similar way. But how? :)
ch
faster than synchronizing after each delete.
I like my deleted messages to fade away, too, but using a limit is a
little more trouble than I want (I can't really use other limits this
way) and I sometimes want to find messages marked for deletion again
before I sync. So I just use colors, inste
Todd --
...and then Todd Kokoszka said...
%
% I want messages to disappear after I mark them deleted
% or saved. Is there a way to do this in Mutt?
Just synchronize your mailbox. With the default bindings, hit '$' and
anything with a 'D' by it will disappear.
%
% Thanks,
HTH & HAND
% Tod
Todd Kokoszka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [08 Jan 2002 08:32 -0800]:
> I want messages to disappear after I mark them deleted
> or saved. Is there a way to do this in Mutt?
You could make a macro like this:
macro pager d ""
HTH (untested)
cheers
j
--
http://www.epic.org - Electronic Privacy Inform
I want messages to disappear after I mark them deleted
or saved. Is there a way to do this in Mutt?
Thanks,
Todd
=
Todd Kokoszka
25, rue Richard Lenoir
75011 Paris
Tel. 01.43.72.77.08
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail!
ht
Thusly Thwacked By John Arundel:
>
> set trash="/mail/trash"
>
> in muttrc, with
>
> unset trash
>
> to turn it off.
>
While you're at it, add:
set trash_clean=30 # number of days to hold an email
before permanently deleti
Yes, it is! Thanks Darren
Vittorio
darren chamberlain [mutt-users] <06/07/01 07:27 -0400>:
> Victor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said something to this effect on 07/06/2001:
> > While mutt's running I'd like all the deleted messages to be
> > automatically move f
On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 10:39:56AM -0400, Justin R. Miller wrote:
> Here are a couple of macros that I use for a "trash can":
The list archive is filled with 101 variations on this theme.
I haven't found a patch anywhere which implements a pukka trash folder. All
the macro solutions have various
darren chamberlain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said something to this effect on
07/06/2001:
> Victor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said something to this effect on 07/06/2001:
> > While mutt's running I'd like all the deleted messages to be
> > automatically move from the va
Victor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said something to this effect on 07/06/2001:
> While mutt's running I'd like all the deleted messages to be
> automatically move from the various folders to a specific folder to be
> kept for a strecth of time and be definetely deleted at my w
While mutt's running I'd like all the deleted messages to be
automatically move from the various folders to a specific folder to be
kept for a strecth of time and be definetely deleted at my will and/or
exiting from mutt.
Is that possible with mutt and HOW?
Ciao
Vittorio
Just make a macro for delete to go to say... =trash
On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 12:52:15PM -0700, Pyuesh Daya muttered:
| Hi All
|
| Is there anyway that I can save mail that I have delete in the future.I already
|copymy
| +mail that I send to people !!
|
| Regards
|
--
/Jason G Helfman
"A
On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 02:09:14PM +, Nollaig MacKenzie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On 2000.10.06 12:52:15, you,
> the extraordinary Pyuesh Daya, opined:
> > Is there anyway that I can save mail that I have delete in the future.I
>already copymy
> > +mail that I send to people !!
>
>
On 2000.10.06 12:52:15, you,
the extraordinary Pyuesh Daya, opined:
> Hi All
>
> Is there anyway that I can save mail that I have delete in the future.I already
>copymy
> +mail that I send to people !!
>
> Regards
You could change the binding for "d" thus:
macro index d s+wastebasket\n
Hi All
Is there anyway that I can save mail that I have delete in the future.I already
copymy
+mail that I send to people !!
Regards
Hi,
On Mon, May 01, 2000 at 03:04:11PM -0400, Hardy Merrill wrote:
> I haven't been able to find how to "expunge" deleted messages from
> mutt - the only way I've been able to do that is to delete the
> message(s) and then exit out of mutt, and then come back
Hardy Merrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 01 May 2000:
> I haven't been able to find how to "expunge" deleted messages from
> mutt - the only way I've been able to do that is to delete the
> message(s) and then exit out of mutt, and then come back in.
I haven't been able to find how to "expunge" deleted messages from
mutt - the only way I've been able to do that is to delete the
message(s) and then exit out of mutt, and then come back in. Sorry
for these basic questions - still learning.
--
Hardy Merrill
Mission Crit
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 08:35:56PM -0800, Gary Johnson wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 08:16:18PM -0800, Gary Johnson wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 02:33:06AM +, J McKitrick wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 04:50:40PM -0800, Gary Johnson wrote:
>
> Sorry about that. I didn't see th
On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 12:15:37AM -0800, Eugene Lee wrote:
(SNIP)
> message as deleted, and moves my current select to message #38. As far
> as I know, there is no mechanism within Mutt to remember your previous
> selection; thus there's no way to automagically jump from message #38
> back to
messages when navigating, of course.
Interpreting your message differently, there's not a way to do so.
Using an example pager index:
36 Mar 13 J McKitrick (0.4K) selecting deleted messages
37 D Mar 13 Gary Johnson(0.6K) |->
38 Mar 14 J McKitrick (0.8K) |-
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 08:16:18PM -0800, Gary Johnson wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 02:33:06AM +, J McKitrick wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 04:50:40PM -0800, Gary Johnson wrote:
Sorry about that. I didn't see the new messages in the other thread
until after I sent that. I've got to
e i
> just deleted. Is there any way besides typing the message number? It
> seems J and K only go to non-deleted messages.
That's odd. I'm using "Mutt 1.0pre4us" and it has the following key
bindings (from the Index help):
J next-entry move to the
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 04:51:36PM -0600, David DeSimone wrote:
> Peter Poeml <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> are bound to). The default bindinds for these functions are "J" and
> "K", which are the shifted letters. VI users will find these bindings
> convenient. Others will likely not find th
; to get back to that message besides entering the message number? The
> > index skips deleted messages when navigating, of course.
>
> Navigate using upper-case letters 'J' and 'K'.
Navigating isn't the problem, it's when i want to go to a message i
just de
Correction: my mistake. I forgot shifted-J and K are different.
Thanks.
jm
--
-
Jonathon McKitrick / [EMAIL PROTECTED] \
"I prefer the term Artificial Person myself."/
-
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 06:09:55PM +, J McKitrick wrote:
> I know mutt has an option (resolve) to not move to the next message
> after performing an action. If i delete a message, is there any way
> to get back to that message besides entering the message number? The
> index s
Peter Poeml <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You can also go to the message just above the deleted one, and press
> 'u'. Will not work when there is no undeleted mail above or when
> there are too many other deleted mails above, though.
This is really just a side-effect of the undelete operation,
I know mutt has an option (resolve) to not move to the next message
after performing an action. If i delete a message, is there any way
to get back to that message besides entering the message number? The
index skips deleted messages when navigating, of course.
jm
gt; index skips deleted messages when navigating, of course.
You can also go to the message just above the deleted one, and press
'u'. Will not work when there is no undeleted mail above or when there
are too many other deleted mails above, though.
Another way is undelete-pattern (forgot
J McKitrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 13 Mar 2000:
> If i delete a message, is there any way
> to get back to that message besides entering the message number? The
> index skips deleted messages when navigating, of course.
With the previous-entry or next-entry fu
I know mutt has an option (resolve) to not move to the next message
after performing an action. If i delete a message, is there any way
to get back to that message besides entering the message number? The
index skips deleted messages when navigating, of course.
jm
David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I was trying to figure out a way to get the arrow keys to behave like
> that, but I couldn't find the symbol for a shifted arrow :-) I'm sure
> the key code/sequence exists, so ...
There is no keycode for a shifted arrow. A standard VT100 terminal
won't
t out that even with the default bindings (?) you can scroll up/down
Yep.
% in the index including the deleted messages if you use J/K for movement.
% No need to type in the msg number, though that works too.
That's what I like, since I'm a vi guy.
%
% It's probably more sensible t
Warning
Could not process message with given Content-Type:
multipart/signed; boundary=7l042bGvurpep9Wg; micalg=pgp-md5;protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Ken W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Since I normally use and instead of j and k, I wanted to
> make with shift- or control- to do J and K.
Most keyboards do not generate different codes for the shifted arrow
keys. The usually generate the same codes whether you're pressing shift
or control or
On Tue, Feb 16, 1999, Vikas Agnihotri wrote:
> Well, Mutt is telling you what the problem is. previous-message is a
> invalid function. As I said earlier, the functions you are looking for
> are "previous-entry" and "previous-undeleted".
Well, then someone had better change the manual
(http://ww
On Mon, Feb 15, 1999, Vikas Agnihotri wrote:
>
> We already have next/previous-undeleted(j/k) and next/previous-entry(J/K).
> Nuff, me thinks.
That's what I was looking for. Thanks. Problem, though. Since I
normally use and instead of j and k, I wanted to make with
shift- or control- to do
I have mutt set like elm, I think the default, to skip messages marked
for deletion in the index when going up or down, so I have to skip to
the particular message number to go to one marked for deletion. Sorry
if this is already a feature, but I think it would be great to be able
to toggle this
73 matches
Mail list logo
